INDIVIDUAL STRENGTH CHANGES FOLLOWING A VERY BRIEF INTERVENTION ON NATIONAL STRENGTH TRAINING GUIDELINES IN ADULTS AGED 50 - 75 YEARS

Dr. Ashley Gluchowski
{"title":"INDIVIDUAL STRENGTH CHANGES FOLLOWING A VERY BRIEF INTERVENTION ON NATIONAL STRENGTH TRAINING GUIDELINES IN ADULTS AGED 50 - 75 YEARS","authors":"Dr. Ashley Gluchowski","doi":"10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n There is little evidence that the public or healthcare practitioners are aware of and implementing the strength training component of the United Kingdom’s (UK) Chief Medical Officers’ physical activity guidelines in practice. Our study aimed to objectively measure strength following a very brief intervention with the strength component to determine if this practice could increase muscle strength.\n \n \n \n This was a mixed method, one-arm, pre-post six-month study. Thirty adults aged 50-75 years had hand grip (upper) isometric strength and ankle plantarflexion (lower) isometric strength measured. The average of two trials on the dominant limb were recorded. Participants were provided a physical copy of the guidelines and were asked to follow the strength recommendations. The very brief intervention (five minutes) included information on why and how to follow the strength guidelines, example exercises, along with a proven behaviour change technique (providing a journal to record training sessions). Strength was tested after six-months.\n \n \n \n The group average indicated that there was no change in upper or lower body strength from baseline. However, when data were viewed individually, upper body strength was gained in 21 of 30 participants and lost in 9 (range: -4.5 to +6 kg). 42% of participants gained more than 2 kg in hand strength after six-months. Lower body strength was gained in 15 participants and lost in 15 (range: -12.4 to +8.65 kg). 43% of participants lost more than 2 kg. Qualitatively participants took the opportunity to ‘procure some new weights’ as they found their weights at home ‘too easy.’ Participants had a new-found realisation that ‘strength training is vital to muscle strength.’ Some mentioned that ‘strength training is now part of my life.’ On the other hand, other participants wanted more, noting that ‘there should be more publicity, information about [strength training] to the general public’ and found it unnecessarily ‘hard to find [follow up information] online.’\n \n \n \n In the movement to make ‘every contact count,’ a very brief intervention has been shown to raise awareness and change strength training behaviour. Healthcare practitioners should focus on lower body exercise examples alongside progression techniques to avoid rapid loss in lower body strength. Public health stakeholders need to work together to provide easily accessible strength training resources.\n","PeriodicalId":92070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical exercise physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical exercise physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is little evidence that the public or healthcare practitioners are aware of and implementing the strength training component of the United Kingdom’s (UK) Chief Medical Officers’ physical activity guidelines in practice. Our study aimed to objectively measure strength following a very brief intervention with the strength component to determine if this practice could increase muscle strength. This was a mixed method, one-arm, pre-post six-month study. Thirty adults aged 50-75 years had hand grip (upper) isometric strength and ankle plantarflexion (lower) isometric strength measured. The average of two trials on the dominant limb were recorded. Participants were provided a physical copy of the guidelines and were asked to follow the strength recommendations. The very brief intervention (five minutes) included information on why and how to follow the strength guidelines, example exercises, along with a proven behaviour change technique (providing a journal to record training sessions). Strength was tested after six-months. The group average indicated that there was no change in upper or lower body strength from baseline. However, when data were viewed individually, upper body strength was gained in 21 of 30 participants and lost in 9 (range: -4.5 to +6 kg). 42% of participants gained more than 2 kg in hand strength after six-months. Lower body strength was gained in 15 participants and lost in 15 (range: -12.4 to +8.65 kg). 43% of participants lost more than 2 kg. Qualitatively participants took the opportunity to ‘procure some new weights’ as they found their weights at home ‘too easy.’ Participants had a new-found realisation that ‘strength training is vital to muscle strength.’ Some mentioned that ‘strength training is now part of my life.’ On the other hand, other participants wanted more, noting that ‘there should be more publicity, information about [strength training] to the general public’ and found it unnecessarily ‘hard to find [follow up information] online.’ In the movement to make ‘every contact count,’ a very brief intervention has been shown to raise awareness and change strength training behaviour. Healthcare practitioners should focus on lower body exercise examples alongside progression techniques to avoid rapid loss in lower body strength. Public health stakeholders need to work together to provide easily accessible strength training resources.
对 50 - 75 岁成年人进行国家力量训练指南的简短干预后个人力量的变化
几乎没有证据表明公众或医疗从业人员了解英国首席医疗官体育锻炼指南中的力量训练部分并在实践中加以实施。我们的研究旨在通过对力量部分进行非常简短的干预,客观地测量力量,以确定这种做法是否能增强肌肉力量。 这是一项为期 6 个月的单臂前-后混合法研究。对 30 名 50-75 岁的成年人进行了手部握力(上部)等长力量和踝关节跖屈(下部)等长力量的测量。记录主导肢体两次试验的平均值。向参与者提供了一份指南的实物,并要求他们遵循力量建议。非常简短的干预(5 分钟)包括关于为什么和如何遵循力量指南的信息、示例练习以及一种行之有效的行为改变技术(提供记录训练课程的日志)。六个月后进行了力量测试。 小组平均值显示,上半身或下半身力量与基线相比没有变化。然而,在对个人数据进行分析时,30 名参与者中有 21 人的上肢力量有所增强,9 人的上肢力量有所减弱(范围:-4.5 至 +6 千克)。42% 的参与者在 6 个月后手部力量增加了 2 公斤以上。15 名参与者的下半身力量有所增强,15 名参与者的下半身力量有所减弱(范围:-12.4 至 +8.65 千克)。43% 的参与者减重超过 2 公斤。从质量上看,参与者利用这次机会 "购买了一些新的重量",因为他们发现家里的重量 "太简单了"。参与者重新认识到 "力量训练对肌肉力量至关重要"。有些人提到,"力量训练现在已经成为我生活的一部分。'另一方面,其他参与者则希望得到更多,他们指出'应该向公众进行更多的宣传,提供更多有关[力量训练]的信息',并认为'在网上很难找到[后续信息]'是不必要的。 在 "让每一次接触都有意义 "的运动中,一项非常简短的干预措施已被证明能够提高人们的意识并改变力量训练行为。医疗保健从业人员应将重点放在下半身锻炼的实例上,同时采用循序渐进的技巧,以避免下半身力量的快速流失。公共卫生利益相关者需要共同努力,提供易于获取的力量训练资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信