Assessment of abiotic reduction rates of organic compounds by interpretable structural factors and experimental conditions in anoxic water environments
Mohammad Hossein Keshavarz, Zeinab Shirazi, Mohammad Jafari, Arezoo Rajabi
{"title":"Assessment of abiotic reduction rates of organic compounds by interpretable structural factors and experimental conditions in anoxic water environments","authors":"Mohammad Hossein Keshavarz, Zeinab Shirazi, Mohammad Jafari, Arezoo Rajabi","doi":"10.1016/j.comtox.2024.100315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>For organic contaminants in lake sediments, aquifers, and anaerobic bioreactors, their reduction is one of the primary transformation paths in these anoxic water environments. A simple model is introduced to predict pseudo-first order rate constants (<em>k<sub>obs</sub></em>) for the abiotic reduction of organic compounds featuring diverse reducible functional groups. It utilizes the largest experimental dataset of –log <em>k<sub>obs</sub></em>, encompassing 59 organic compounds (278 data points). Unlike available complex quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) methods, the novel approach requires both experimental conditions and structural parameters. In comparison to one of the available general QSAR methods, the new model demonstrates favorable performance. The average absolute deviation (AAD), absolute maximum deviation (AD<sub>max</sub>), average absolute relative deviation (AARD%), and R-squared (R<sup>2</sup>) values of the estimated outputs for 54/5 training/test data sets of the new model are 0.641/1.761, 1.761/1.417, 20.52/83.87, and 0.797/0.949, respectively. On the other hand, the available general comparative QSAR method shows the AAD: 1.311/2.301, AD<sub>max</sub>: 3.795/3.732, AARD%: 641.0/821.2, and R<sup>2</sup>: 0.003/0.447. For the test set, AAD, AARD%, AD<sub>max</sub>, and R<sup>2</sup> values for the new/comparative models are 0.649/2.403, 62.20/190.5, 1.215/3.732 and 0.974/0.789, respectively. In summary, the new model offers a straightforward approach for the manual calculation of –log <em>k<sub>obs</sub></em>, demonstrating excellent goodness-of-fit, reliability, precision, and accuracy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37651,"journal":{"name":"Computational Toxicology","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 100315"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468111324000173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
For organic contaminants in lake sediments, aquifers, and anaerobic bioreactors, their reduction is one of the primary transformation paths in these anoxic water environments. A simple model is introduced to predict pseudo-first order rate constants (kobs) for the abiotic reduction of organic compounds featuring diverse reducible functional groups. It utilizes the largest experimental dataset of –log kobs, encompassing 59 organic compounds (278 data points). Unlike available complex quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) methods, the novel approach requires both experimental conditions and structural parameters. In comparison to one of the available general QSAR methods, the new model demonstrates favorable performance. The average absolute deviation (AAD), absolute maximum deviation (ADmax), average absolute relative deviation (AARD%), and R-squared (R2) values of the estimated outputs for 54/5 training/test data sets of the new model are 0.641/1.761, 1.761/1.417, 20.52/83.87, and 0.797/0.949, respectively. On the other hand, the available general comparative QSAR method shows the AAD: 1.311/2.301, ADmax: 3.795/3.732, AARD%: 641.0/821.2, and R2: 0.003/0.447. For the test set, AAD, AARD%, ADmax, and R2 values for the new/comparative models are 0.649/2.403, 62.20/190.5, 1.215/3.732 and 0.974/0.789, respectively. In summary, the new model offers a straightforward approach for the manual calculation of –log kobs, demonstrating excellent goodness-of-fit, reliability, precision, and accuracy.
期刊介绍:
Computational Toxicology is an international journal publishing computational approaches that assist in the toxicological evaluation of new and existing chemical substances assisting in their safety assessment. -All effects relating to human health and environmental toxicity and fate -Prediction of toxicity, metabolism, fate and physico-chemical properties -The development of models from read-across, (Q)SARs, PBPK, QIVIVE, Multi-Scale Models -Big Data in toxicology: integration, management, analysis -Implementation of models through AOPs, IATA, TTC -Regulatory acceptance of models: evaluation, verification and validation -From metals, to small organic molecules to nanoparticles -Pharmaceuticals, pesticides, foods, cosmetics, fine chemicals -Bringing together the views of industry, regulators, academia, NGOs