Whisper network knowledge of BAME women in academia: a critical realist, critical race feminist theory model of theorising inequality regimes

Angela Martinez Dy
{"title":"Whisper network knowledge of BAME women in academia: a critical realist, critical race feminist theory model of theorising inequality regimes","authors":"Angela Martinez Dy","doi":"10.1108/edi-03-2023-0093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper introduces a new approach to theorising and learning from Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) women’s experiences of inequality in academia. It offers a versatile model with which the structure of a particular racist-sexist inequality regime can be theorised from empirical evidence.Design/methodology/approachThe paper presents composite, fictionalised accounts of intersectional discrimination which are then analysed through critical realist frameworks, employing critical race feminist theory insights. This novel “whisper network” method centres the knowledge of BAME women in academia, and is translatable to other marginalised actors, offering a more protective means by which to access their knowledge as a foundation for organisational change.FindingsThrough theorising the ontological arrangement of key causal mechanisms responsible for the reproduction of inequality regimes, the paper illuminates links between micro-level intersectional discrimination and meso-level institutional inequality.Research limitations/implicationsIn order to preserve anonymity and reduce potential backlash, the vignettes in this paper are not intended to precisely capture specific empirical realities, but instead reflect wider patterns from the author's own whisper network knowledge. Nonetheless, the analytical method developed here could be applied to rigorously collected empirical data, with clear implications for improving organisational practice.Practical implicationsThe paper offers a structured and systematic process by which qualitative data on institutional inequality can be analysed and stakeholders engaged to develop and propose solutions, even by individuals new to the field.Social implicationsA methodical basis for strategic action addressing the issues revealed through such an analysis can be developed in order to galvanise and steer organisational change.Originality/valueThe novelty of the paper is twofold: in its original synthesis of critical realist depth ontology and ontological insights from critical race feminist theory about social structures of oppression, and in the development of the innovative “whisper network” method based upon a critical race theory counter-storytelling epistemology, in conversation with the emergent stream of literature within feminist organisation studies regarding the importance of “writing differently”.","PeriodicalId":503114,"journal":{"name":"Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal","volume":"23 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/edi-03-2023-0093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis paper introduces a new approach to theorising and learning from Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) women’s experiences of inequality in academia. It offers a versatile model with which the structure of a particular racist-sexist inequality regime can be theorised from empirical evidence.Design/methodology/approachThe paper presents composite, fictionalised accounts of intersectional discrimination which are then analysed through critical realist frameworks, employing critical race feminist theory insights. This novel “whisper network” method centres the knowledge of BAME women in academia, and is translatable to other marginalised actors, offering a more protective means by which to access their knowledge as a foundation for organisational change.FindingsThrough theorising the ontological arrangement of key causal mechanisms responsible for the reproduction of inequality regimes, the paper illuminates links between micro-level intersectional discrimination and meso-level institutional inequality.Research limitations/implicationsIn order to preserve anonymity and reduce potential backlash, the vignettes in this paper are not intended to precisely capture specific empirical realities, but instead reflect wider patterns from the author's own whisper network knowledge. Nonetheless, the analytical method developed here could be applied to rigorously collected empirical data, with clear implications for improving organisational practice.Practical implicationsThe paper offers a structured and systematic process by which qualitative data on institutional inequality can be analysed and stakeholders engaged to develop and propose solutions, even by individuals new to the field.Social implicationsA methodical basis for strategic action addressing the issues revealed through such an analysis can be developed in order to galvanise and steer organisational change.Originality/valueThe novelty of the paper is twofold: in its original synthesis of critical realist depth ontology and ontological insights from critical race feminist theory about social structures of oppression, and in the development of the innovative “whisper network” method based upon a critical race theory counter-storytelling epistemology, in conversation with the emergent stream of literature within feminist organisation studies regarding the importance of “writing differently”.
学术界黑人、亚裔和少数族裔妇女的悄悄话网络知识:不平等制度理论化的批判现实主义、批判种族女权主义理论模式
目的 本文介绍了一种新方法,用于从黑人、亚裔和少数族裔(BAME)妇女在学术界的不平等经历中进行理论分析和学习。设计/方法/途径 本文介绍了综合的、虚构的交叉歧视描述,然后通过批判现实主义框架,运用批判种族女权主义理论的见解,对这些描述进行了分析。这种新颖的 "耳语网络 "方法以学术界黑人、亚裔和少数族裔妇女的知识为中心,并可转化为其他边缘化行为者的知识,为获取她们的知识提供了一种更具保护性的手段,为组织变革奠定了基础。研究结果本文通过对造成不平等制度再现的关键因果机制的本体论安排进行理论分析,阐明了微观层面的交叉歧视与中观层面的制度不平等之间的联系。研究局限性/启示为了保持匿名性并减少潜在的反弹,本文中的小故事无意精确捕捉具体的经验现实,而是反映了作者自己悄悄话网络知识中更广泛的模式。本文提供了一个结构化和系统化的过程,通过这一过程,可以对机构不平等的定性数据进行分析,并让利益相关者参与其中,以制定和提出解决方案,即使是该领域的新手也可以参与其中。社会影响通过这种分析,可以为解决所揭示问题的战略行动提供方法论基础,以激发和引导机构变革。独创性/价值本文的新颖性体现在两个方面:独创性地综合了批判现实主义深度本体论和批判种族女权主义理论中关于压迫社会结构的本体论见解;在批判种族理论反叙事认识论的基础上,结合女权主义组织研究中关于 "以不同方式写作 "重要性的新兴文献流,开发了创新性的 "耳语网络 "方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信