DELIVERING GROUP-BASED TELE-EXERCISE SESSIONS FOR PEOPLE WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES: RESULTS AND EXPERIENTIAL INSIGHTS OF A PILOT STUDY

Mr Matthew Kolasinski, Prof Ronald Plotnikoff, Dr Myles Young, Dr Shelley Keating, Dr Ryan Drew, Dr Emily Cox
{"title":"DELIVERING GROUP-BASED TELE-EXERCISE SESSIONS FOR PEOPLE WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES: RESULTS AND EXPERIENTIAL INSIGHTS OF A PILOT STUDY","authors":"Mr Matthew Kolasinski, Prof Ronald Plotnikoff, Dr Myles Young, Dr Shelley Keating, Dr Ryan Drew, Dr Emily Cox","doi":"10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Delivery of group-based tele-exercise is an emerging treatment option for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D), but best practice is not yet understood. We evaluated the results and experiential insights of a pilot study investigating this model of care.\n \n \n \n Sixteen people with T2D (age 58.7±12.6, 63% male, duration of T2D 10.0±8.4years) underwent an 8-week tele-exercise intervention. Participants were assessed at baseline (in-person and via telehealth; results compared using intra-class correlations coefficients) and post-intervention (in-person only). The program was delivered in groups of 3-5, by an Accredited Exercise Physiologist using Zoom. Sessions were held once weekly and incorporated whole-body aerobic and resistance exercise (45min) and health behaviour change education (15min), reflecting the structure of Medicare-subsidised group exercise physiology sessions. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to gain participant and clinician feedback. Adverse events were monitored throughout.\n \n \n \n The intervention demonstrated efficacy, with improvements in HbA1c (mean change -0.3±0.5%), fasting glucose (-0.8±0.8mmol/L), systolic blood pressure (-6.4±8.4mmHg), waist circumference (-0.8±4.2cm), muscular strength (30sec sit-to-stand score 1.6±2.9; 30sec bicep curl score 5.6±3.0) and fitness (2min step test score 24.5±11.9). Clients could reliably self-assess outcomes such as waist circumference (ICC 0.98, 95%CI 0.95-0.99), 30sec sit-to-stand (0.94, 0.82-0.98), and 2min step test (0.96, 0.87-0.99) when supervised by the clinician via telehealth, negating the need for in-person consults. No serious adverse events were reported. Key experiential insights include 1) Technological issues were minimised by providing clients with a guide for using Zoom, and conducting individual Zoom familiarisation sessions, prior to program start. 2) Client confidentiality could be managed by using breakout rooms for private conversations. 3) Creative exercise selection (e.g., TheraBand anchor points, non-traditional equipment) allowed participants to envision exercising in their home, which assisted in self-management.\n \n \n \n This study contributes practical insights to optimise the delivery of group-based tele-exercise interventions to people with T2\n","PeriodicalId":92070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical exercise physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical exercise physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Delivery of group-based tele-exercise is an emerging treatment option for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D), but best practice is not yet understood. We evaluated the results and experiential insights of a pilot study investigating this model of care. Sixteen people with T2D (age 58.7±12.6, 63% male, duration of T2D 10.0±8.4years) underwent an 8-week tele-exercise intervention. Participants were assessed at baseline (in-person and via telehealth; results compared using intra-class correlations coefficients) and post-intervention (in-person only). The program was delivered in groups of 3-5, by an Accredited Exercise Physiologist using Zoom. Sessions were held once weekly and incorporated whole-body aerobic and resistance exercise (45min) and health behaviour change education (15min), reflecting the structure of Medicare-subsidised group exercise physiology sessions. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to gain participant and clinician feedback. Adverse events were monitored throughout. The intervention demonstrated efficacy, with improvements in HbA1c (mean change -0.3±0.5%), fasting glucose (-0.8±0.8mmol/L), systolic blood pressure (-6.4±8.4mmHg), waist circumference (-0.8±4.2cm), muscular strength (30sec sit-to-stand score 1.6±2.9; 30sec bicep curl score 5.6±3.0) and fitness (2min step test score 24.5±11.9). Clients could reliably self-assess outcomes such as waist circumference (ICC 0.98, 95%CI 0.95-0.99), 30sec sit-to-stand (0.94, 0.82-0.98), and 2min step test (0.96, 0.87-0.99) when supervised by the clinician via telehealth, negating the need for in-person consults. No serious adverse events were reported. Key experiential insights include 1) Technological issues were minimised by providing clients with a guide for using Zoom, and conducting individual Zoom familiarisation sessions, prior to program start. 2) Client confidentiality could be managed by using breakout rooms for private conversations. 3) Creative exercise selection (e.g., TheraBand anchor points, non-traditional equipment) allowed participants to envision exercising in their home, which assisted in self-management. This study contributes practical insights to optimise the delivery of group-based tele-exercise interventions to people with T2
为 2 型糖尿病患者提供集体远程锻炼课程:试点研究的结果和经验启示
对 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者来说,以小组为基础的远程锻炼是一种新兴的治疗方法,但最佳实践尚不清楚。我们评估了一项调查这种护理模式的试点研究的结果和经验见解。 16名2型糖尿病患者(年龄58.7±12.6岁,63%为男性,2型糖尿病病程10.0±8.4年)接受了为期8周的远程锻炼干预。对参与者进行了基线评估(面对面和通过远程医疗;结果使用类内相关系数进行比较)和干预后评估(仅面对面)。该计划由一名认证运动生理学家通过 Zoom 以 3-5 人一组的方式实施。课程每周一次,包括全身有氧运动和阻力运动(45 分钟)以及健康行为改变教育(15 分钟),反映了医疗保险补贴的团体运动生理学课程的结构。我们进行了半结构化访谈,以获得参与者和临床医生的反馈意见。对不良事件进行了全程监控。 干预效果显著,HbA1c(平均变化率为-0.3±0.5%)、空腹血糖(-0.8±0.8mmol/L)、收缩压(-6.4±8.4mmHg)、腰围(-0.8±4.2cm)、肌肉力量(30 秒坐立得分 1.6±2.9;30 秒二头肌卷曲得分 5.6±3.0)和体能(2 分钟台阶测试得分 24.5±11.9)均有所改善。在临床医生通过远程医疗进行监督的情况下,客户可以对腰围(ICC 0.98,95%CI 0.95-0.99)、30 秒坐立(0.94,0.82-0.98)和 2 分钟台阶测试(0.96,0.87-0.99)等结果进行可靠的自我评估,而无需进行面对面咨询。无严重不良事件报告。主要的经验启示包括:1)在项目开始前,为客户提供 Zoom 使用指南,并进行个人 Zoom 熟悉课程,从而将技术问题降至最低。2) 通过使用分组讨论室进行私下交谈,可以为客户保密。3) 创造性的运动选择(如 TheraBand 锚点、非传统设备)使参与者能够设想在家中进行运动,这有助于自我管理。 本研究为优化针对 T2 患者的小组远程锻炼干预提供了实用的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信