A Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Physiotherapy Management of Patients with Non-Specific Low Back Pain

Harikrishnan Ranganathan, Devinder Kaur Ajit Singh
{"title":"A Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Physiotherapy Management of Patients with Non-Specific Low Back Pain","authors":"Harikrishnan Ranganathan, Devinder Kaur Ajit Singh","doi":"10.55489/njcm.150520243849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Despite the availability of various clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) offering evidence-based recommendations, there exists a global diversity in physiotherapy practices for managing patients with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP). In this review, we aim to critically appraise and map the current evidence regarding physiotherapy management for patients with NSLBP.\nMethods: A search strategy was formulated and searched in MEDLINE, Scopus, EBSCOhost, PEDro and Google Scholar between 2013 and 2023 in English. Critical appraisal was performed using International Centre for Allied Health Evidence (iCAHE) guideline checklist.\nResults: A total of 12 CPGs met the selection criteria were synthesised. Exercise therapy, physical activity and manual therapy were consistently recommended for patients with NSLBP across most guidelines, irrespective of symptom duration. Cognitive-behavioural therapy was frequently advised for those with chronic NSLBP. However, notable absences of recommendations for electrotherapy, mechanical traction, bed rest, and lumbar corsets in NSLBP management. Moreover, emerging treatments such as shock wave therapy and cognitive-functional therapy were not extensively addressed in the guidelines.\nConclusion: Multimodal and active forms of physiotherapy management were predominantly recommended in most of the guidelines. However, there is a clear necessity for updated CPG that effectively integrate biopsychosocial approaches into the management of patients with NSLBP.","PeriodicalId":489477,"journal":{"name":"National journal of community medicine","volume":"28 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National journal of community medicine","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55489/njcm.150520243849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the availability of various clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) offering evidence-based recommendations, there exists a global diversity in physiotherapy practices for managing patients with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP). In this review, we aim to critically appraise and map the current evidence regarding physiotherapy management for patients with NSLBP. Methods: A search strategy was formulated and searched in MEDLINE, Scopus, EBSCOhost, PEDro and Google Scholar between 2013 and 2023 in English. Critical appraisal was performed using International Centre for Allied Health Evidence (iCAHE) guideline checklist. Results: A total of 12 CPGs met the selection criteria were synthesised. Exercise therapy, physical activity and manual therapy were consistently recommended for patients with NSLBP across most guidelines, irrespective of symptom duration. Cognitive-behavioural therapy was frequently advised for those with chronic NSLBP. However, notable absences of recommendations for electrotherapy, mechanical traction, bed rest, and lumbar corsets in NSLBP management. Moreover, emerging treatments such as shock wave therapy and cognitive-functional therapy were not extensively addressed in the guidelines. Conclusion: Multimodal and active forms of physiotherapy management were predominantly recommended in most of the guidelines. However, there is a clear necessity for updated CPG that effectively integrate biopsychosocial approaches into the management of patients with NSLBP.
非特异性腰痛患者物理治疗临床实践指南回顾
背景:尽管有各种临床实践指南(CPG)提供以证据为基础的建议,但全球范围内对非特异性腰背痛(NSLBP)患者进行物理治疗的方法却多种多样。在这篇综述中,我们旨在批判性地评估和绘制有关非特异性腰背痛患者物理治疗管理的现有证据:方法:我们制定了一项检索策略,并在 2013 年至 2023 年期间在 MEDLINE、Scopus、EBSCOhost、PEDro 和 Google Scholar 中进行了英文检索。采用国际联合健康证据中心(iCAHE)指南清单进行严格评估:结果:共汇总了 12 份符合筛选标准的 CPG。在大多数指南中,无论症状持续时间长短,都一致建议对 NSLBP 患者进行运动疗法、体育锻炼和手法治疗。认知行为疗法经常被推荐给慢性 NSLBP 患者。然而,在 NSLBP 的治疗中,电疗、机械牵引、卧床休息和腰部束衣的建议明显缺乏。此外,指南中也未广泛涉及冲击波疗法和认知功能疗法等新兴疗法:结论:大多数指南都主要推荐多模式和积极的物理治疗方法。然而,显然有必要更新 CPG,将生物心理社会方法有效地纳入非甾体抗炎药物患者的管理中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信