EARLY POST-OPERATIVE CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY COMPARING IN-PERSON CLINIC VERSUS TELEHEALTH-DELIVERED REHABILITATION PROGRAM: A NON-INFERIORITY TRIAL

Mr Ray Seaby, Dr Jay Ebert, Dr Brendan Joss, Dr Peter Edwards, Prof Tim Ackland
{"title":"EARLY POST-OPERATIVE CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY COMPARING IN-PERSON CLINIC VERSUS TELEHEALTH-DELIVERED REHABILITATION PROGRAM: A NON-INFERIORITY TRIAL","authors":"Mr Ray Seaby, Dr Jay Ebert, Dr Brendan Joss, Dr Peter Edwards, Prof Tim Ackland","doi":"10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Rehabilitation following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is essential to mitigate delay in physical recovery and facilitate optimum patient outcomes. Telehealth is emerging as a cost-effective and efficacious delivery method. The aim of this study was to investigate the early post-operative outcomes of patients following a telehealth-delivered rehabilitation program (Tele) compared with those following conventional outpatient rehabilitation (Clinic) in patients following TKA.\n \n \n \n A single-blinded, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial was conducted, with 108 participants scheduled for primary TKA randomly allocated to a 6-week, telehealth-delivered rehabilitation program (n=54) or a 6-week supervised, in-person rehabilitation program (n=54). Knee flexion range of motion (KF-ROM) and the Quality of Life subscale of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-QOL) were collected pre-surgery and 7-weeks post-surgery. A linear mixed-effect model was used to assess differences between groups over time for both outcome measures. Change in KOOS-QOL of greater than 10 points was used to establish minimally clinically important change (MCIC), with chi square analyses used to assess between-group differences.\n \n \n \n Baseline KF-ROM measures were 124.1° and 122.2° for telehealth-delivered and in-person groups respectively; and 108.7° and 111.6° at 7-week post-surgery. KOOS-QOL scores were 32.7 and 33.3 at baseline for the respective groups; and 60.9 and 62.9 at week-7. There were no significant differences in between group changes over time for both KF-ROM (mean difference = -2.9°, 95% CI = -7.7 to 1.8; p=0.226) and KOOS-QOL (mean difference = -2.1, 95% CI: -10.0 to 5.9; p=0.611). Chi square analyses revealed no differences between groups meeting the MCIC (Tele = 71%; Clinic = 79%) in KF-ROM (X2 = 0.78, p = 0.377).\n \n \n \n Short term outcomes following TKA are not different between telehealth-delivered and conventional supervised rehabilitation. Telehealth may provide an effective rehabilitation option for patients undergoing TKA.\n","PeriodicalId":92070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical exercise physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical exercise physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rehabilitation following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is essential to mitigate delay in physical recovery and facilitate optimum patient outcomes. Telehealth is emerging as a cost-effective and efficacious delivery method. The aim of this study was to investigate the early post-operative outcomes of patients following a telehealth-delivered rehabilitation program (Tele) compared with those following conventional outpatient rehabilitation (Clinic) in patients following TKA. A single-blinded, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial was conducted, with 108 participants scheduled for primary TKA randomly allocated to a 6-week, telehealth-delivered rehabilitation program (n=54) or a 6-week supervised, in-person rehabilitation program (n=54). Knee flexion range of motion (KF-ROM) and the Quality of Life subscale of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-QOL) were collected pre-surgery and 7-weeks post-surgery. A linear mixed-effect model was used to assess differences between groups over time for both outcome measures. Change in KOOS-QOL of greater than 10 points was used to establish minimally clinically important change (MCIC), with chi square analyses used to assess between-group differences. Baseline KF-ROM measures were 124.1° and 122.2° for telehealth-delivered and in-person groups respectively; and 108.7° and 111.6° at 7-week post-surgery. KOOS-QOL scores were 32.7 and 33.3 at baseline for the respective groups; and 60.9 and 62.9 at week-7. There were no significant differences in between group changes over time for both KF-ROM (mean difference = -2.9°, 95% CI = -7.7 to 1.8; p=0.226) and KOOS-QOL (mean difference = -2.1, 95% CI: -10.0 to 5.9; p=0.611). Chi square analyses revealed no differences between groups meeting the MCIC (Tele = 71%; Clinic = 79%) in KF-ROM (X2 = 0.78, p = 0.377). Short term outcomes following TKA are not different between telehealth-delivered and conventional supervised rehabilitation. Telehealth may provide an effective rehabilitation option for patients undergoing TKA.
对接受全膝关节置换术的患者术后早期临床疗效进行比较,对比亲自门诊与远程医疗提供的康复计划:非劣效性试验
全膝关节置换术(TKA)后的康复治疗对于缓解身体恢复的延迟和促进患者获得最佳治疗效果至关重要。远程医疗正在成为一种经济有效的方法。本研究的目的是对接受远程医疗康复项目(Tele)与接受传统门诊康复项目(Clinic)的 TKA 患者术后早期疗效进行比较。 我们进行了一项单盲、随机对照的非劣效性试验,108 名计划接受初级 TKA 的患者被随机分配到为期 6 周的远程医疗康复计划(54 人)或为期 6 周的现场监督康复计划(54 人)中。在手术前和手术后7周收集膝关节屈曲活动范围(KF-ROM)和膝关节损伤与骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS-QOL)的生活质量分量表。采用线性混合效应模型来评估两组间随时间变化的结果测量差异。KOOS-QOL变化超过10点时,将确定最小临床意义变化(MCIC),并使用卡方分析评估组间差异。 远程医疗组和面对面组的基线 KF-ROM 测量值分别为 124.1° 和 122.2°;手术后 7 周的测量值分别为 108.7° 和 111.6°。各组的 KOOS-QOL 评分在基线时分别为 32.7 分和 33.3 分;在第 7 周时分别为 60.9 分和 62.9 分。随着时间的推移,KF-ROM(平均差异 = -2.9°,95% CI = -7.7至1.8;P=0.226)和KOOS-QOL(平均差异 = -2.1,95% CI:-10.0至5.9;P=0.611)的组间变化无明显差异。卡方分析显示,在KF-ROM(X2 = 0.78,P = 0.377)方面,符合MCIC(远程=71%;诊所=79%)的组间无差异。 TKA术后的短期疗效在远程医疗和传统监督康复之间没有差异。远程医疗可为接受 TKA 手术的患者提供有效的康复选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信