Research of closed loop characteristics of single and double chamber structure for fuel metering mechanism

Peng Zhang, AnChang Jiang
{"title":"Research of closed loop characteristics of single and double chamber structure for fuel metering mechanism","authors":"Peng Zhang, AnChang Jiang","doi":"10.1177/16878132241242986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are two forms of engine fuel metering devices which are single and double chamber structures using electro-hydraulic servo valves as electro-hydraulic conversion devices to realize accurate fuel flow measurements and constant pressure differential valve is used to maintain the constant pressure difference of the metering valve. The main purpose of this article is to analyze the time domain and frequency domain characteristics of constant pressure differential valve assembly and compare the closed-loop characteristics of two metering mechanisms. Firstly, the mathematical model of constant pressure differential valve assembly (including the fuel pump and constant pressure differential valve) is established and its time and frequency domain characteristics are analyzed. The conclusion that the constant pressure differential of the metering valve can meet the practical requirements is obtained. Secondly, the mathematical models of single and double-chamber fuel metering mechanisms are established considering the specific working conditions. Finally, the characteristics of two kinds of metering mechanisms are compared and analyzed under the same control method in the time and frequency domain. The extension overshoot with a maximum value of 3.564% of the single chamber control metering valve mechanism is smaller than that of the double chamber control metering valve mechanism with a maximum extension overshoot of 6.04%. The negative overshoot with a maximum value of 1.391% of the single chamber control metering valve mechanism is bigger than the double chamber control metering valve mechanism with a maximum negative overshoot value of 1.17%. In terms of steady-state error, the steady-state error of a single chamber control metering valve mechanism with a maximum value of 0.194 mm and minimum value of 1.25e-6 mm is smaller than that maximum value of 0.302 mm and minimum value of 1.95e-6 mm of double chamber control metering valve mechanism under the same controller parameters. The bandwidth of the extension motion of the single and double chamber control metering valve is greater than that of the retraction motion. Under the same proportional control parameter, the bandwidth of the double chamber control metering valve extension motion system is greater than that of the single chamber extension motion system.","PeriodicalId":502561,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mechanical Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/16878132241242986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are two forms of engine fuel metering devices which are single and double chamber structures using electro-hydraulic servo valves as electro-hydraulic conversion devices to realize accurate fuel flow measurements and constant pressure differential valve is used to maintain the constant pressure difference of the metering valve. The main purpose of this article is to analyze the time domain and frequency domain characteristics of constant pressure differential valve assembly and compare the closed-loop characteristics of two metering mechanisms. Firstly, the mathematical model of constant pressure differential valve assembly (including the fuel pump and constant pressure differential valve) is established and its time and frequency domain characteristics are analyzed. The conclusion that the constant pressure differential of the metering valve can meet the practical requirements is obtained. Secondly, the mathematical models of single and double-chamber fuel metering mechanisms are established considering the specific working conditions. Finally, the characteristics of two kinds of metering mechanisms are compared and analyzed under the same control method in the time and frequency domain. The extension overshoot with a maximum value of 3.564% of the single chamber control metering valve mechanism is smaller than that of the double chamber control metering valve mechanism with a maximum extension overshoot of 6.04%. The negative overshoot with a maximum value of 1.391% of the single chamber control metering valve mechanism is bigger than the double chamber control metering valve mechanism with a maximum negative overshoot value of 1.17%. In terms of steady-state error, the steady-state error of a single chamber control metering valve mechanism with a maximum value of 0.194 mm and minimum value of 1.25e-6 mm is smaller than that maximum value of 0.302 mm and minimum value of 1.95e-6 mm of double chamber control metering valve mechanism under the same controller parameters. The bandwidth of the extension motion of the single and double chamber control metering valve is greater than that of the retraction motion. Under the same proportional control parameter, the bandwidth of the double chamber control metering valve extension motion system is greater than that of the single chamber extension motion system.
燃料计量机构的单腔和双腔结构闭环特性研究
发动机燃油计量装置有单腔和双腔两种结构形式,采用电液伺服阀作为电液转换装置,实现精确的燃油流量测量,采用恒压差阀维持计量阀的恒定压差。本文的主要目的是分析恒压差阀组件的时域和频域特性,并比较两种计量机构的闭环特性。首先,建立了恒压差阀总成(包括燃油泵和恒压差阀)的数学模型,并分析了其时域和频域特性。得出了计量阀的恒压差能满足实际要求的结论。其次,结合具体工况,建立了单腔和双腔燃油计量机构的数学模型。最后,在相同的控制方法下,比较分析了两种计量机构在时域和频域上的特性。单腔控制计量阀机构的最大扩展过冲值为 3.564%,小于双腔控制计量阀机构的最大扩展过冲值 6.04%。单腔控制计量阀机构的负过冲最大值为 1.391%,大于双腔控制计量阀机构的负过冲最大值 1.17%。在稳态误差方面,在相同的控制器参数下,单腔控制计量阀机构的稳态误差最大值为 0.194 mm,最小值为 1.25e-6 mm,小于双腔控制计量阀机构的稳态误差最大值 0.302 mm,最小值 1.95e-6 mm。单腔和双腔控制计量阀的伸展运动带宽大于回缩运动带宽。在相同的比例控制参数下,双腔控制计量阀伸展运动系统的带宽大于单腔控制计量阀伸展运动系统的带宽。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信