HOW HAS KIDS PHYSICAL ACTIVITY PREVIOUSLY BEEN MEASURED IN AUSTRALIA? AND WHAT QUESTIONS COULD WE USE IN THE FUTURE?

Verity Booth, Natasha Schranz, Professor Grant Tomkinson, Professor David Lubans, Professor Tim Olds
{"title":"HOW HAS KIDS PHYSICAL ACTIVITY PREVIOUSLY BEEN MEASURED IN AUSTRALIA? AND WHAT QUESTIONS COULD WE USE IN THE FUTURE?","authors":"Verity Booth, Natasha Schranz, Professor Grant Tomkinson, Professor David Lubans, Professor Tim Olds","doi":"10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n The complex nature of children’s and adolescents’ participation in physical activity (PA) makes it difficult to measure. Questions have been used in Australia for many decades to subjectively monitor PA and sedentarism, however there is no consensus on which are the best. Since better data is needed to more accurately determine PA participation, the aim of this research was to identify existing questions and utilise expert opinion to develop a set of recommended questions.\n \n \n \n An audit of existing research measuring Australian children’s and adolescents’ participation in PA and sedentary behaviours was conducted. Existing questions were collated, classified and described in terms of the behaviours they measured and how they have previously been used. A two-round online Delphi method was chosen to identify experts’ opinions on existing questions measuring PA and sedentary behaviours.\n \n \n \n From 1951 to 2019, 362 index questions were identified as previously used to measure PA and sedentary behaviours. The questions were diverse, with varying characteristics such as the behaviours measured, question structure, recall timeframe, and temporal alterations to the questions. Some continuity in data collection was identified, with one question measuring overall PA participation repeated 35 times across different studies. Within the Delphi questionnaire, 29 experts provided feedback on 31 questions which met the pre-determined criteria. The highest-ranked questions measuring participation in overall PA and sedentary behaviours were selected as two key questions for measuring compliance to PA guidelines.\n \n \n \n Numerous questions exist able to measure compliance to guidelines or more specific measurement needs. If researchers and practitioners utilise recommended questions, it will help to accumulate comparative data and provide further insight on how to meaningfully improve PA of an individual child or a whole population.\n","PeriodicalId":92070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical exercise physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical exercise physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The complex nature of children’s and adolescents’ participation in physical activity (PA) makes it difficult to measure. Questions have been used in Australia for many decades to subjectively monitor PA and sedentarism, however there is no consensus on which are the best. Since better data is needed to more accurately determine PA participation, the aim of this research was to identify existing questions and utilise expert opinion to develop a set of recommended questions. An audit of existing research measuring Australian children’s and adolescents’ participation in PA and sedentary behaviours was conducted. Existing questions were collated, classified and described in terms of the behaviours they measured and how they have previously been used. A two-round online Delphi method was chosen to identify experts’ opinions on existing questions measuring PA and sedentary behaviours. From 1951 to 2019, 362 index questions were identified as previously used to measure PA and sedentary behaviours. The questions were diverse, with varying characteristics such as the behaviours measured, question structure, recall timeframe, and temporal alterations to the questions. Some continuity in data collection was identified, with one question measuring overall PA participation repeated 35 times across different studies. Within the Delphi questionnaire, 29 experts provided feedback on 31 questions which met the pre-determined criteria. The highest-ranked questions measuring participation in overall PA and sedentary behaviours were selected as two key questions for measuring compliance to PA guidelines. Numerous questions exist able to measure compliance to guidelines or more specific measurement needs. If researchers and practitioners utilise recommended questions, it will help to accumulate comparative data and provide further insight on how to meaningfully improve PA of an individual child or a whole population.
澳大利亚以前是如何测量儿童体育活动的?我们将来可以使用哪些问题?
儿童和青少年参与体育活动(PA)的复杂性使其难以测量。几十年来,澳大利亚一直在使用一些问题来主观监测儿童和青少年的体育锻炼和久坐情况,但对于哪些问题是最好的,目前还没有达成共识。由于需要更好的数据来更准确地确定参与体育锻炼的情况,本研究的目的是确定现有的问题,并利用专家意见来制定一套推荐问题。 我们对衡量澳大利亚儿童和青少年参与体育锻炼和久坐行为的现有研究进行了审核。对现有问题进行了整理、分类,并根据其测量的行为和以前的使用方式进行了描述。选择了两轮在线德尔菲法,以确定专家对现有测量运动量和久坐行为的问题的意见。 从 1951 年到 2019 年,共确定了 362 个指数问题,这些问题曾被用于测量 PA 和久坐行为。这些问题多种多样,具有不同的特点,如测量的行为、问题结构、回忆时限以及问题的时间变化。数据收集具有一定的连续性,其中一个测量总体 PA 参与情况的问题在不同的研究中重复出现了 35 次。在德尔菲问卷调查中,29 位专家就 31 个符合预定标准的问题提供了反馈意见。排名最靠前的两个问题分别是衡量总体 PA 参与情况和久坐行为,这两个问题被选为衡量 PA 指导方针依从性的关键问题。 现有的许多问题都可以测量对指南的遵从情况或更具体的测量需求。如果研究人员和从业人员利用推荐的问题,将有助于积累比较数据,并进一步了解如何有意义地改善单个儿童或整个人群的 PA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信