Trabecular metal backed glenoids in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: outcomes after a decade on average

Q4 Medicine
{"title":"Trabecular metal backed glenoids in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: outcomes after a decade on average","authors":"","doi":"10.1053/j.sart.2024.03.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>First-generation trabecular metal (TM) backed glenoids reported poor implant survival and were recalled from the market. Second generation TM glenoids have demonstrated promising findings at short- and mid-term follow-up. In our study, we report on clinical and radiographic outcomes of TM glenoids with an average of 10 years of clinical and radiographic follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The charts of 14 TM glenoid patients with minimum 5 years follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. The primary end points included implant survival, range of motion, and patient-reported outcomes. Additionally, radiographic data (metal debris, lateral humeral offset (LHO), acromiohumeral interval (AHI)) were studied.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>The mean age at surgery was 52 ± 11 years and the mean follow-up time was 10 ± 3 years. Implant survivorship was 100%. Range of motion improved significantly following surgery. Forward elevation changed from 120 ± 22º preoperatively to 155 ± 13º postoperatively (</span><em>P</em> &lt; .01). The mean external rotation showed a statistically significant increase from 19 ± 30º preoperatively to 54 ± 13º postoperatively (<em>P</em> &lt; .01). Internal rotation improved six vertebral levels on average (<em>P</em> &lt; .01). Pain levels decreased significantly from 7 ± 1 to 2 ± 2 (<em>P</em> &lt; .01) while American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder scores increased from 35 ± 10 to 83 ± 21 (<em>P</em> &lt; .01). Simple Shoulder Test scores demonstrated an improvement from 5 ± 3 to 10 ± 3 (<em>P</em> &lt; .01). No patients had glenoid loosening, metal debris, or radioluency on radiographic imaging. The immediate LHO was 18 (standard deviation [SD] ± 9) and final LHO of 16 (SD ± 8) (<em>P</em> value = .01). The immediate AHI was 12 (SD ± 3) and final AHI was 11 (SD ± 3) (<em>P</em> value = .01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>TM backed glenoids should remain in the modern orthopedic surgeon’s armamentarium of procedures. This particular glenoid design showed 100% implant survival at a decade following surgery, and provided sustained improvements in range of motion and shoulder function in osteoarthritic patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39885,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","volume":"34 3","pages":"Pages 657-662"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045452724000543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

First-generation trabecular metal (TM) backed glenoids reported poor implant survival and were recalled from the market. Second generation TM glenoids have demonstrated promising findings at short- and mid-term follow-up. In our study, we report on clinical and radiographic outcomes of TM glenoids with an average of 10 years of clinical and radiographic follow-up.

Methods

The charts of 14 TM glenoid patients with minimum 5 years follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. The primary end points included implant survival, range of motion, and patient-reported outcomes. Additionally, radiographic data (metal debris, lateral humeral offset (LHO), acromiohumeral interval (AHI)) were studied.

Results

The mean age at surgery was 52 ± 11 years and the mean follow-up time was 10 ± 3 years. Implant survivorship was 100%. Range of motion improved significantly following surgery. Forward elevation changed from 120 ± 22º preoperatively to 155 ± 13º postoperatively (P < .01). The mean external rotation showed a statistically significant increase from 19 ± 30º preoperatively to 54 ± 13º postoperatively (P < .01). Internal rotation improved six vertebral levels on average (P < .01). Pain levels decreased significantly from 7 ± 1 to 2 ± 2 (P < .01) while American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder scores increased from 35 ± 10 to 83 ± 21 (P < .01). Simple Shoulder Test scores demonstrated an improvement from 5 ± 3 to 10 ± 3 (P < .01). No patients had glenoid loosening, metal debris, or radioluency on radiographic imaging. The immediate LHO was 18 (standard deviation [SD] ± 9) and final LHO of 16 (SD ± 8) (P value = .01). The immediate AHI was 12 (SD ± 3) and final AHI was 11 (SD ± 3) (P value = .01).

Conclusion

TM backed glenoids should remain in the modern orthopedic surgeon’s armamentarium of procedures. This particular glenoid design showed 100% implant survival at a decade following surgery, and provided sustained improvements in range of motion and shoulder function in osteoarthritic patients.

解剖型全肩关节置换术中的骨小梁金属背板:平均十年后的结果
背景据报道,第一代小梁金属(TM)背衬式玻璃假体的植入存活率很低,并从市场上召回。第二代小梁金属义齿在短期和中期随访中显示出良好的效果。在我们的研究中,我们报告了平均 10 年临床和放射学随访的 TM 人工晶状体的临床和放射学结果。方法回顾性分析了 14 位至少随访 5 年的 TM 人工晶状体患者的病历。主要终点包括植入物存活率、活动范围和患者报告的结果。此外,还研究了放射学数据(金属碎片、肱骨外侧偏移(LHO)、肱骨肩峰间距(AHI))。假体存活率为100%。术后活动范围明显改善。前倾从术前的 120 ± 22º 变为术后的 155 ± 13º (P < .01)。平均外旋度从术前的 19 ± 30º 增加到术后的 54 ± 13º(P <.01),差异有统计学意义。内旋平均改善了六个椎体水平(P <.01)。疼痛程度从 7 ± 1 显著降至 2 ± 2(P < .01),而美国肩肘外科医生肩关节评分从 35 ± 10 上升至 83 ± 21(P < .01)。简单肩关节测试评分从 5 ± 3 分提高到 10 ± 3 分(P < .01)。在放射影像学检查中,没有患者出现盂状松动、金属碎屑或放射性肿块。即时 LHO 为 18(标准差 [SD] ± 9),最终 LHO 为 16(标准差 ± 8)(P 值 = .01)。即时 AHI 为 12(标准差±3),最终 AHI 为 11(标准差±3)(P 值 = 0.01)。这种特殊的盂兰盆设计在术后十年内显示出 100% 的植入存活率,并能持续改善骨关节炎患者的活动范围和肩关节功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in Arthroplasty
Seminars in Arthroplasty Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
期刊介绍: Each issue of Seminars in Arthroplasty provides a comprehensive, current overview of a single topic in arthroplasty. The journal addresses orthopedic surgeons, providing authoritative reviews with emphasis on new developments relevant to their practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信