Mr Alexandre Kovats, Mr Adrian Ram, Matthew D Jones, A/Prof John Booth, Dr Mitchell T. Gibbs, A/Prof Jeanette Thom
{"title":"PAINFUL VS NON-PAINFUL EXERCISE ON CREPITUS IN PEOPLE WITH KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS: A MIXED-METHODS ANALYSIS","authors":"Mr Alexandre Kovats, Mr Adrian Ram, Matthew D Jones, A/Prof John Booth, Dr Mitchell T. Gibbs, A/Prof Jeanette Thom","doi":"10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Crepitus (or physiological noise) is a key criterion in the diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Exercise is foundational to guideline-based care for knee OA, however the effect exercise on knee crepitus is unknown. This study aimed to explore the perceptions of people with knee OA following a 6-week accredited exercise physiologist (AEP) led intervention involving painful vs non-painful exercise, especially in relation to their knee crepitus.\n \n \n \n Participants were randomly assigned to either a painful (higher intensity) or non-painful (lower intensity) exercise program supervised by an AEP twice a week for six weeks with concurrent education. Volunteers partook in a post-intervention semi-structured interview with questions surrounding their experience and perceived outcomes of the program. Thematic qualitative analysis was conducted and compared to the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) crepitus question (0 - 4 scale).\n \n \n \n Eleven participants volunteered. Qualitatively, approximately half of the participants self-reported a decrease in their knee crepitus following the program “I haven’t had the creaky knees so much”, with the rest stating their crepitus did not change. No participants perceived their crepitus increased (n=9 no change, n=2 decreased) or said that their crepitus was worse, “the noise and grinding doesn’t become evident (now) until the weights become higher”. Quantitatively, KOOS crepitus scores also did not change following the intervention [mean (SD) (2.4(1.0) to 2.1(1.3), p=0.19)]. There were no differences between exercise groups in self-perceived crepitus results, and most said that the exercise program was beneficial “Right after this whole program, I find that I can move much easier.”\n \n \n \n Exercise at higher intensities (into painful range) does not change crepitus or may improve it for some. People with OA perceive that exercise at both higher and lower intensity is beneficial and enjoyable.\n","PeriodicalId":92070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical exercise physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical exercise physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Crepitus (or physiological noise) is a key criterion in the diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Exercise is foundational to guideline-based care for knee OA, however the effect exercise on knee crepitus is unknown. This study aimed to explore the perceptions of people with knee OA following a 6-week accredited exercise physiologist (AEP) led intervention involving painful vs non-painful exercise, especially in relation to their knee crepitus.
Participants were randomly assigned to either a painful (higher intensity) or non-painful (lower intensity) exercise program supervised by an AEP twice a week for six weeks with concurrent education. Volunteers partook in a post-intervention semi-structured interview with questions surrounding their experience and perceived outcomes of the program. Thematic qualitative analysis was conducted and compared to the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) crepitus question (0 - 4 scale).
Eleven participants volunteered. Qualitatively, approximately half of the participants self-reported a decrease in their knee crepitus following the program “I haven’t had the creaky knees so much”, with the rest stating their crepitus did not change. No participants perceived their crepitus increased (n=9 no change, n=2 decreased) or said that their crepitus was worse, “the noise and grinding doesn’t become evident (now) until the weights become higher”. Quantitatively, KOOS crepitus scores also did not change following the intervention [mean (SD) (2.4(1.0) to 2.1(1.3), p=0.19)]. There were no differences between exercise groups in self-perceived crepitus results, and most said that the exercise program was beneficial “Right after this whole program, I find that I can move much easier.”
Exercise at higher intensities (into painful range) does not change crepitus or may improve it for some. People with OA perceive that exercise at both higher and lower intensity is beneficial and enjoyable.