Use of FOLFOXIRI Plus Bevacizumab and Subsequent Therapies in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: An Age-Stratified Analysis

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
{"title":"Use of FOLFOXIRI Plus Bevacizumab and Subsequent Therapies in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: An Age-Stratified Analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.clcc.2024.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Treatment recommendations for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) do not differ by age group; nevertheless, aggressive multiagent chemotherapy comprising FOLFOXIRI+bevacizumab (triplet+bev) is routinely administered in younger patients. This study analyzed real-world data on index triplet+bev use and subsequent systemic therapies.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>This retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted in patients aged ≥ 18 years with mCRC, who were initiated on triplet+bev. Data were derived from the Optum de-identified electronic health record dataset.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 36,056 patients, 14%, 36%, and 50% were aged 18-49, 50-64, and ≥ 65 years, respectively. During the study period (2010-2021), triplet+bev use increased in patients aged 18-49 years (1%-4%) but remained at approximately 3% and 1% in patients aged 50-64 and ≥ 65 years, respectively. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics varied slightly; of patients receiving triplet+bev (n = 921) versus nontriplet+bev (n = 35,132) most were male (57% vs. 52%), resided in the Midwest (54% vs. 49%) and Northeast (18% vs. 14%) US regions, and had secondary malignancies (86% vs. 73%). Following triplet+bev, most patients received subsequent therapies (including continued triplet component therapies; 97%) or subsequent “new” therapies (therapies that did not include any agents comprising triplet+bev; 57%), most frequently EGFR inhibitors (28%) and regorafenib (21%), with a similar trend among all age groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Overall, this study shows that younger patients with mCRC are more likely to receive first-line triplet+bev. These results also reveal that nonchemotherapy options are often used beyond first-line triplet chemotherapy for patients with mCRC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1533002824000318/pdfft?md5=e861cd6529b5d79baa26e8835e2140a2&pid=1-s2.0-S1533002824000318-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1533002824000318","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Treatment recommendations for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) do not differ by age group; nevertheless, aggressive multiagent chemotherapy comprising FOLFOXIRI+bevacizumab (triplet+bev) is routinely administered in younger patients. This study analyzed real-world data on index triplet+bev use and subsequent systemic therapies.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted in patients aged ≥ 18 years with mCRC, who were initiated on triplet+bev. Data were derived from the Optum de-identified electronic health record dataset.

Results

Of 36,056 patients, 14%, 36%, and 50% were aged 18-49, 50-64, and ≥ 65 years, respectively. During the study period (2010-2021), triplet+bev use increased in patients aged 18-49 years (1%-4%) but remained at approximately 3% and 1% in patients aged 50-64 and ≥ 65 years, respectively. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics varied slightly; of patients receiving triplet+bev (n = 921) versus nontriplet+bev (n = 35,132) most were male (57% vs. 52%), resided in the Midwest (54% vs. 49%) and Northeast (18% vs. 14%) US regions, and had secondary malignancies (86% vs. 73%). Following triplet+bev, most patients received subsequent therapies (including continued triplet component therapies; 97%) or subsequent “new” therapies (therapies that did not include any agents comprising triplet+bev; 57%), most frequently EGFR inhibitors (28%) and regorafenib (21%), with a similar trend among all age groups.

Conclusions

Overall, this study shows that younger patients with mCRC are more likely to receive first-line triplet+bev. These results also reveal that nonchemotherapy options are often used beyond first-line triplet chemotherapy for patients with mCRC.

在转移性结直肠癌中使用 FOLFOXIRI 加贝伐单抗及后续疗法:年龄分层分析
背景转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的治疗建议并不因年龄组而异;然而,由 FOLFOXIRI+bevacizumab (三联+bev)组成的积极多药化疗在年轻患者中被常规使用。本研究分析了三联+贝伐指数使用和后续系统疗法的真实世界数据。材料与方法本回顾性观察队列研究的对象是年龄≥ 18 岁、开始接受三联+贝伐治疗的 mCRC 患者。结果 在 36056 名患者中,18-49 岁、50-64 岁和≥65 岁的患者分别占 14%、36% 和 50%。在研究期间(2010-2021 年),18-49 岁患者使用三联+啤酒的比例有所上升(1%-4%),但 50-64 岁和≥65 岁患者使用三联+啤酒的比例分别保持在 3% 和 1% 左右。患者的人口统计学特征和临床特征略有不同;在接受三联+贝伐(n = 921)与非三联+贝伐(n = 35,132 )的患者中,大多数为男性(57% 对 52%),居住在美国中西部(54% 对 49%)和东北部(18% 对 14%)地区,并且患有继发性恶性肿瘤(86% 对 73%)。三联+贝伐疗法后,大多数患者接受了后续疗法(包括继续三联成分疗法;97%)或后续 "新 "疗法(不包括三联+贝伐疗法中任何药物的疗法;57%),其中最常见的是表皮生长因子受体抑制剂(28%)和瑞戈非尼(21%),所有年龄组的趋势相似。这些结果还显示,在一线三联化疗之外,mCRC 患者还经常使用非化疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信