Law and order: what can we expect from an incoming Labour government?

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
SOUNDINGS Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.3898/soun.86.08.2024
Kirsten Forkert, Kevin Blowe
{"title":"Law and order: what can we expect from an incoming Labour government?","authors":"Kirsten Forkert, Kevin Blowe","doi":"10.3898/soun.86.08.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Kirsten Forkert talks to Kevin Blowe, campaigns coordinator of Netpol A Starmer-led government is unlikely to deviate from the mainstream-constructed consensus on policing Netpol - the Network for Police Monitoring ‐ is a coalition of organisations that liaise together\n on monitoring police activities. Cases it has been involved in include those of Ian Tomlinson and Jean Charles de Menezes. As DPP, Keir Starmer confirmed CPS decisions not to prosecute the police officers concerned in these deaths. Such actions, together with other positions he has adopted,\n tell us that Starmer doesn’t understand the massive imbalance in power between the individual and the state: when he was in a position to adjudicate on where that balance lies, he always came down on the side of the state. He has little understanding of social movements, seeing change\n as happening within committee meetings ‐ as involving discussions amongst people with real power. Labour’s criticisms of the Police, Crime, Sentencing, and Courts Act, and the Public Order Act have also been tepid. All this means that a Starmer-led government is unlikely to deviate\n from the mainstream-constructed consensus on policing. It is likely to continue to give the police whatever they say they need to deal with a given situation. There may be noises made about the importance of human rights, and, possibly, there will be fewer attacks on judges when there are\n legal challenges, and less resort to culture-war rhetoric; and at least Labour won’t abolish the Human Rights Act, which means that there will still be a basis for challenging actions that contravene it. But an incoming Labour government is unlikely to provide a greater degree of protection\n to people who are vulnerable to overreaching state power. Dealing with policing in communities over many years has not been about asking grand questions about what happens during elections: it has been about finding processes for survival ‐ helping people to develop a sense of power,\n the confidence to complain and to organise, to push back against local councillors who are not prepared to challenge the police commander in their area. This often stops people in particular areas from experiencing the same level of oppressive policing as they would without local opposition.\n This is why local Copwatch groups are so important. After the election, regardless of who wins, there is still going to be an absolutely essential role for people who do this grassroots work: that???s where you are going to be able to make a difference.","PeriodicalId":45378,"journal":{"name":"SOUNDINGS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOUNDINGS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3898/soun.86.08.2024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Kirsten Forkert talks to Kevin Blowe, campaigns coordinator of Netpol A Starmer-led government is unlikely to deviate from the mainstream-constructed consensus on policing Netpol - the Network for Police Monitoring ‐ is a coalition of organisations that liaise together on monitoring police activities. Cases it has been involved in include those of Ian Tomlinson and Jean Charles de Menezes. As DPP, Keir Starmer confirmed CPS decisions not to prosecute the police officers concerned in these deaths. Such actions, together with other positions he has adopted, tell us that Starmer doesn’t understand the massive imbalance in power between the individual and the state: when he was in a position to adjudicate on where that balance lies, he always came down on the side of the state. He has little understanding of social movements, seeing change as happening within committee meetings ‐ as involving discussions amongst people with real power. Labour’s criticisms of the Police, Crime, Sentencing, and Courts Act, and the Public Order Act have also been tepid. All this means that a Starmer-led government is unlikely to deviate from the mainstream-constructed consensus on policing. It is likely to continue to give the police whatever they say they need to deal with a given situation. There may be noises made about the importance of human rights, and, possibly, there will be fewer attacks on judges when there are legal challenges, and less resort to culture-war rhetoric; and at least Labour won’t abolish the Human Rights Act, which means that there will still be a basis for challenging actions that contravene it. But an incoming Labour government is unlikely to provide a greater degree of protection to people who are vulnerable to overreaching state power. Dealing with policing in communities over many years has not been about asking grand questions about what happens during elections: it has been about finding processes for survival ‐ helping people to develop a sense of power, the confidence to complain and to organise, to push back against local councillors who are not prepared to challenge the police commander in their area. This often stops people in particular areas from experiencing the same level of oppressive policing as they would without local opposition. This is why local Copwatch groups are so important. After the election, regardless of who wins, there is still going to be an absolutely essential role for people who do this grassroots work: that???s where you are going to be able to make a difference.
法律与秩序:我们对即将上任的工党政府有何期待?
克尔斯滕-福尔克特(Kirsten Forkert)与 Netpol 运动协调员凯文-布洛(Kevin Blowe)进行了交谈 斯塔默领导的政府不太可能偏离主流构建的警务共识。它参与的案件包括伊恩-汤姆林森(Ian Tomlinson)和让-查尔斯-德-梅内泽斯(Jean Charles de Menezes)案。作为检察长,基尔-斯塔默(Keir Starmer)确认了英国皇家检察院不起诉这些死亡案件中相关警官的决定。这些行为以及他所采取的其他立场告诉我们,斯塔默并不了解个人与国家之间权力的巨大不平衡:当他有能力裁定这种平衡在哪里时,他总是站在国家一边。他对社会运动知之甚少,认为变革是在委员会会议上发生的,是在拥有实权的人之间进行的讨论。工党对《警察、犯罪、判决和法院法》以及《公共秩序法》的批评也是不温不火。所有这一切都意味着,斯塔默领导的政府不太可能偏离主流构建的警务共识。它很可能会继续给予警方他们所说的处理特定情况所需的一切。可能会有关于人权重要性的声音,也可能会在遇到法律挑战时减少对法官的攻击,减少诉诸文化战争的言论;至少工党不会废除《人权法》,这意味着仍有依据对违反《人权法》的行为提出质疑。但是,即将上台的工党政府不太可能为那些容易受到越权国家权力影响的人提供更大程度的保护。多年来,处理社区警务问题一直不是为了对选举期间发生的事情提出宏大的问题:而是为了找到生存的程序--帮助人们树立权力意识,增强投诉和组织起来的信心,对那些不准备挑战所在地区警察指挥官的地方议员进行反击。这通常会阻止特定地区的人们在没有地方反对的情况下遭受同样程度的压迫性警务。这就是地方警察观察组织如此重要的原因。选举结束后,无论谁获胜,从事基层工作的人员仍将发挥绝对重要的作用:这正是您能够有所作为的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SOUNDINGS
SOUNDINGS HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信