Clinical implementation of a commercial synthetic computed tomography solution for radiotherapy treatment of glioblastoma

IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Sevgi Emin , Elia Rossi , Elisabeth Myrvold Rooth , Torsten Dorniok , Mattias Hedman , Giovanna Gagliardi , Fernanda Villegas
{"title":"Clinical implementation of a commercial synthetic computed tomography solution for radiotherapy treatment of glioblastoma","authors":"Sevgi Emin ,&nbsp;Elia Rossi ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Myrvold Rooth ,&nbsp;Torsten Dorniok ,&nbsp;Mattias Hedman ,&nbsp;Giovanna Gagliardi ,&nbsp;Fernanda Villegas","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Purpose</h3><p>Magnetic resonance (MR)-only radiotherapy (RT) workflow eliminates uncertainties due to computed tomography (CT)-MR image registration, by using synthetic CT (sCT) images generated from MR. This study describes the clinical implementation process, from retrospective commissioning to prospective validation stage of a commercial artificial intelligence (AI)-based sCT product. Evaluation of the dosimetric performance of the sCT is presented, with emphasis on the impact of voxel size differences between image modalities.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>sCT performance was assessed in glioblastoma RT planning. Dose differences for 30 patients in both commissioning and validation cohorts were calculated at various dose-volume-histogram (DVH) points for target and organs-at-risk (OAR). A gamma analysis was conducted on regridded image plans. Quality assurance (QA) guidelines were established based on commissioning phase results.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Mean dose difference to target structures was found to be within ± 0.7 % regardless of image resolution and cohort. OARs’ mean dose differences were within ± 1.3 % for plans calculated on regridded images for both cohorts, while differences were higher for plans with original voxel size, reaching up to −4.2 % for chiasma D2% in the commissioning cohort. Gamma passing rates for the brain structure using the criteria 1 %/1mm, 2 %/2mm and 3 %/3mm were 93.6 %/99.8 %/100 % and 96.6 %/99.9 %/100 % for commissioning and validation cohorts, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Dosimetric outcomes in both commissioning and validation stages confirmed sCT’s equivalence to CT. The large patient cohort in this study aided in establishing a robust QA program for the MR-only workflow, now applied in glioblastoma RT at our center.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000599/pdfft?md5=a8a0010d377763cc77048052e12a32c8&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624000599-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose

Magnetic resonance (MR)-only radiotherapy (RT) workflow eliminates uncertainties due to computed tomography (CT)-MR image registration, by using synthetic CT (sCT) images generated from MR. This study describes the clinical implementation process, from retrospective commissioning to prospective validation stage of a commercial artificial intelligence (AI)-based sCT product. Evaluation of the dosimetric performance of the sCT is presented, with emphasis on the impact of voxel size differences between image modalities.

Materials and methods

sCT performance was assessed in glioblastoma RT planning. Dose differences for 30 patients in both commissioning and validation cohorts were calculated at various dose-volume-histogram (DVH) points for target and organs-at-risk (OAR). A gamma analysis was conducted on regridded image plans. Quality assurance (QA) guidelines were established based on commissioning phase results.

Results

Mean dose difference to target structures was found to be within ± 0.7 % regardless of image resolution and cohort. OARs’ mean dose differences were within ± 1.3 % for plans calculated on regridded images for both cohorts, while differences were higher for plans with original voxel size, reaching up to −4.2 % for chiasma D2% in the commissioning cohort. Gamma passing rates for the brain structure using the criteria 1 %/1mm, 2 %/2mm and 3 %/3mm were 93.6 %/99.8 %/100 % and 96.6 %/99.9 %/100 % for commissioning and validation cohorts, respectively.

Conclusions

Dosimetric outcomes in both commissioning and validation stages confirmed sCT’s equivalence to CT. The large patient cohort in this study aided in establishing a robust QA program for the MR-only workflow, now applied in glioblastoma RT at our center.

用于胶质母细胞瘤放射治疗的商用合成计算机断层扫描解决方案的临床应用
背景和目的仅使用磁共振(MR)的放射治疗(RT)工作流程通过使用由磁共振生成的合成 CT(sCT)图像,消除了计算机断层扫描(CT)-MR 图像配准带来的不确定性。本研究描述了基于人工智能(AI)的商用 sCT 产品从回顾性调试到前瞻性验证阶段的临床实施过程。材料与方法在胶质母细胞瘤 RT 规划中评估了 sCT 的性能。在目标和危险器官(OAR)的不同剂量-容积-柱状图(DVH)点计算了委托组和验证组 30 名患者的剂量差异。对重新网格化的图像计划进行了伽马分析。根据调试阶段的结果,制定了质量保证(QA)准则。结果发现,无论图像分辨率和队列如何,靶结构的平均剂量差在± 0.7%以内。在两个队列中,根据重新网格化图像计算的OARs平均剂量差异均在±1.3%以内,而原始体素大小的OARs剂量差异则更大,在试运行队列中,椎间隙D2%的OARs剂量差异高达-4.2%。根据 1%/1mm、2%/2mm 和 3%/3mm 的标准,委托组和验证组的大脑结构伽马通过率分别为 93.6 %/99.8 %/100 % 和 96.6 %/99.9 %/100%。这项研究中庞大的患者群有助于为只用磁共振的工作流程建立强大的质量保证计划,目前我们中心已将该计划应用于胶质母细胞瘤的放射治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信