Development and Validation of Prognostic Nomogram to Predict Overall Survival for Older Patients Who Age 75 Years or Older With Urothelial Carcinoma of Bladder

Junwei Li, Yanfang Ye, Xiaojing Li, Xinxin Xie, Tao Qin
{"title":"Development and Validation of Prognostic Nomogram to Predict Overall Survival for Older Patients Who Age 75 Years or Older With Urothelial Carcinoma of Bladder","authors":"Junwei Li, Yanfang Ye, Xiaojing Li, Xinxin Xie, Tao Qin","doi":"10.1097/ju9.0000000000000132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Age is an important factor for prognostic factor in bladder cancer. However, most clinical studies targeting bladder cancer have limited the upper age limit to 75 years. With the higher age of diagnosis of older patients with bladder cancer, there is a lack of prognostic data for bladder cancer at advanced ages. In this study, we analyzed the prognostic factors of older patients with bladder cancer 75 years or older using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data.\n \n \n \n Clinical parameters that constitute potential risk factors were analyzed by downloading a total of 13,505 patients with bladder cancer from the SEER database using univariate and multifactorial Cox proportional risk regression. Nomogram was constructed based on parameters significantly associated with overall survival (OS). The consistency index (c-index) and area under the curve were used to evaluate the predictive performance of the model.\n \n \n \n From the SEER database, we analyzed 13,505 cases and found that the median survival time for the whole cohort was 52 months. However, the median survival was 11 months, 8 months, and 6 months in 75 to 79 years subgroup, 80 to 84 years subgroup, and older than 85 years subgroup, when patients were diagnosed with stage IV. OS was poorer in the high histological grade patients. Furthermore, it was found that patients with lymph node metastasis had a significantly unfavorable prognosis than those with negative lymph nodes. The more advanced stage and distant metastases of patients had the shorter survival. Patients who underwent surgery had better overall survival than nonsurgical patients, and chemotherapy had prolonged survival. Conversely, survival was documented to be shorter with radiotherapy than those without radiotherapy.\n \n \n \n The overall prognosis of older patients with bladder cancer was poor, especially in patients with lymph node metastasis, high histological grade, and advanced stage, while a combination of surgery and chemotherapy could prolong survival.\n","PeriodicalId":508272,"journal":{"name":"JU Open Plus","volume":"5 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JU Open Plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju9.0000000000000132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Age is an important factor for prognostic factor in bladder cancer. However, most clinical studies targeting bladder cancer have limited the upper age limit to 75 years. With the higher age of diagnosis of older patients with bladder cancer, there is a lack of prognostic data for bladder cancer at advanced ages. In this study, we analyzed the prognostic factors of older patients with bladder cancer 75 years or older using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data. Clinical parameters that constitute potential risk factors were analyzed by downloading a total of 13,505 patients with bladder cancer from the SEER database using univariate and multifactorial Cox proportional risk regression. Nomogram was constructed based on parameters significantly associated with overall survival (OS). The consistency index (c-index) and area under the curve were used to evaluate the predictive performance of the model. From the SEER database, we analyzed 13,505 cases and found that the median survival time for the whole cohort was 52 months. However, the median survival was 11 months, 8 months, and 6 months in 75 to 79 years subgroup, 80 to 84 years subgroup, and older than 85 years subgroup, when patients were diagnosed with stage IV. OS was poorer in the high histological grade patients. Furthermore, it was found that patients with lymph node metastasis had a significantly unfavorable prognosis than those with negative lymph nodes. The more advanced stage and distant metastases of patients had the shorter survival. Patients who underwent surgery had better overall survival than nonsurgical patients, and chemotherapy had prolonged survival. Conversely, survival was documented to be shorter with radiotherapy than those without radiotherapy. The overall prognosis of older patients with bladder cancer was poor, especially in patients with lymph node metastasis, high histological grade, and advanced stage, while a combination of surgery and chemotherapy could prolong survival.
开发并验证预测 75 岁或以上膀胱尿路上皮癌老年患者总生存期的预后提名图
年龄是影响膀胱癌预后的一个重要因素。然而,大多数针对膀胱癌的临床研究都将年龄上限限制在 75 岁。由于老年膀胱癌患者的确诊年龄较高,因此缺乏高龄膀胱癌的预后数据。在这项研究中,我们利用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据分析了 75 岁或以上老年膀胱癌患者的预后因素。 我们从 SEER 数据库中下载了 13,505 名膀胱癌患者,采用单变量和多因素 Cox 比例风险回归分析了构成潜在风险因素的临床参数。根据与总生存期(OS)显著相关的参数构建了提名图。一致性指数(c-index)和曲线下面积用于评估模型的预测性能。 我们从 SEER 数据库中分析了 13,505 个病例,发现整个队列的中位生存时间为 52 个月。然而,在确诊为 IV 期的患者中,75 至 79 岁亚组、80 至 84 岁亚组和 85 岁以上亚组的中位生存期分别为 11 个月、8 个月和 6 个月。组织学分级高的患者的 OS 较差。此外,研究还发现,淋巴结转移患者的预后明显差于淋巴结阴性患者。越是晚期和远处转移的患者生存期越短。接受手术治疗的患者总生存期优于未接受手术治疗的患者,而化疗可延长患者的生存期。相反,接受放疗的患者的生存期要短于未接受放疗的患者。 老年膀胱癌患者的总体预后较差,尤其是淋巴结转移、组织学分级高和晚期的患者,而手术和化疗相结合可延长患者的生存期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信