Development and validation of a tool to assess patient and caregiver satisfaction for minor pediatric surgical procedures

Karan Gandhi , Jacob Davidson , Camille Duggal , Vanessa Fantillo , Julie E. Strychowsky
{"title":"Development and validation of a tool to assess patient and caregiver satisfaction for minor pediatric surgical procedures","authors":"Karan Gandhi ,&nbsp;Jacob Davidson ,&nbsp;Camille Duggal ,&nbsp;Vanessa Fantillo ,&nbsp;Julie E. Strychowsky","doi":"10.1016/j.yjpso.2024.100145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Patient satisfaction questionnaires offer valuable perspectives on patient experiences and the quality of healthcare received. Despite their importance, a gold standard for measuring patient satisfaction in pediatric surgery remains elusive. This study introduces a patient satisfaction questionnaire designed to fill the gap in evaluating patient experiences specifically in pediatric surgical settings, aiming to create a standardized measure for assessing patient satisfaction.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The think-aloud method was used with patient advisors and an expert panel of hospital stakeholders to refine a novel patient and caregiver satisfaction tool. Through an iterative process, data was gathered, analyzed and the survey progressively revised. The final survey was then pilot tested.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three patient advisors and seven hospital stakeholders participated in the study. The think-aloud method was used to establish cognitive, content, and face validity. There were five distinct satisfaction domains established. Pilot testing included 30 participants and was used to establish construct validity and test-retest reliability.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study addresses the existing gap in measuring patient satisfaction in pediatric surgery settings. The think-aloud method was used to ensure cognitive, content, and face validity ensuring multiple domains are addressed. Pilot testing of the tool showed feasibility in both the operating room and minor procedure room setting while also demonstrating test re-test validity. These results indicate that this questionnaire holds promise for use in a variety of pediatric surgical settings. Further research is necessary to confirm these findings in larger, more diverse populations and to assess its impact on improving patient care and experiences.</p></div><div><h3>Type of Study</h3><p>Survey Development and Validation Study.</p></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>III</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Open","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949711624000303/pdfft?md5=7eaa504cc593bfe3d07aed1f41c7b11e&pid=1-s2.0-S2949711624000303-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949711624000303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Patient satisfaction questionnaires offer valuable perspectives on patient experiences and the quality of healthcare received. Despite their importance, a gold standard for measuring patient satisfaction in pediatric surgery remains elusive. This study introduces a patient satisfaction questionnaire designed to fill the gap in evaluating patient experiences specifically in pediatric surgical settings, aiming to create a standardized measure for assessing patient satisfaction.

Methods

The think-aloud method was used with patient advisors and an expert panel of hospital stakeholders to refine a novel patient and caregiver satisfaction tool. Through an iterative process, data was gathered, analyzed and the survey progressively revised. The final survey was then pilot tested.

Results

Three patient advisors and seven hospital stakeholders participated in the study. The think-aloud method was used to establish cognitive, content, and face validity. There were five distinct satisfaction domains established. Pilot testing included 30 participants and was used to establish construct validity and test-retest reliability.

Conclusions

This study addresses the existing gap in measuring patient satisfaction in pediatric surgery settings. The think-aloud method was used to ensure cognitive, content, and face validity ensuring multiple domains are addressed. Pilot testing of the tool showed feasibility in both the operating room and minor procedure room setting while also demonstrating test re-test validity. These results indicate that this questionnaire holds promise for use in a variety of pediatric surgical settings. Further research is necessary to confirm these findings in larger, more diverse populations and to assess its impact on improving patient care and experiences.

Type of Study

Survey Development and Validation Study.

Level of Evidence

III

开发并验证用于评估患者和护理人员对儿科小手术满意度的工具
导言:患者满意度问卷调查为患者的就医体验和医疗质量提供了宝贵的视角。尽管其重要性不言而喻,但衡量小儿外科患者满意度的黄金标准仍未出台。本研究介绍了一种患者满意度调查问卷,旨在填补儿科手术患者体验评估方面的空白,旨在创建一种评估患者满意度的标准化测量方法。方法通过患者顾问和医院利益相关者组成的专家小组采用畅所欲言法来完善一种新型患者和护理人员满意度工具。通过迭代过程,收集、分析数据并逐步修改调查问卷。然后对最终调查问卷进行了试点测试。研究采用了 "思考-朗读 "法来确定认知、内容和表面有效性。确定了五个不同的满意度领域。这项研究填补了儿科手术患者满意度测量方面的空白。该研究采用了 "思考-朗读 "方法,以确保认知、内容和表面的有效性,并确保多个领域都得到了考虑。该工具的试点测试表明其在手术室和小手术室环境中都具有可行性,同时也证明了测试再测试的有效性。这些结果表明,该问卷有望在各种儿科手术环境中使用。有必要进行进一步研究,以便在更大规模、更多样化的人群中证实这些发现,并评估其对改善患者护理和体验的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信