Who Does(n't) Target You?

Fabio Votta, Simon Kruschinski, Mads Hove, Natali Helberger, T. Dobber, Claes de Vreese
{"title":"Who Does(n't) Target You?","authors":"Fabio Votta, Simon Kruschinski, Mads Hove, Natali Helberger, T. Dobber, Claes de Vreese","doi":"10.51685/jqd.2024.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Political campaigns are increasingly investing in targeted advertising on social media platforms to reach voters. Despite critical implications for citizens and elections, little is known about the targeting strategies deployed by political parties — especially in countries beyond the global north. This paper provides a comprehensive descriptive analysis of political microtargeting practices on Facebook and Instagram across 95 countries during 113 national elections. By analyzing the Meta Ad Targeting dataset, we explore targeting strategies of 54k political advertisers who ran 2.5 million ads between August 2020 and December 2022. The findings indicate that election campaigns worldwide utilize targeted advertising. Most commonly, spending is allocated towards a single targeting criterion, however, in wealthier countries and electoral systems with proportional representation, a greater amount of money is spent on microtargeting by combining multiple criteria. Furthermore, targeting strategies vary along ideological lines of political parties who seek out voters more typically aligned with each side of the political spectrum. Nonetheless, parties use microtargeting irrespective of political ideology. Our findings offer the first comparative analysis of political microtargeting on Meta platforms for countries across all continents. Methodologically, we introduce a semi-automatic method to identify worldwide political advertisers using multiple data sources. Our study deepens the understanding of how country and party contexts explain differences in targeting strategies, highlighting the need for more research beyond the global north. Finally, our results have important implications for policy makers, and other stakeholders who seek to develop regulations to address the challenges posed by political microtargeting techniques.","PeriodicalId":93587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of quantitative description: digital media","volume":"42 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of quantitative description: digital media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51685/jqd.2024.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Political campaigns are increasingly investing in targeted advertising on social media platforms to reach voters. Despite critical implications for citizens and elections, little is known about the targeting strategies deployed by political parties — especially in countries beyond the global north. This paper provides a comprehensive descriptive analysis of political microtargeting practices on Facebook and Instagram across 95 countries during 113 national elections. By analyzing the Meta Ad Targeting dataset, we explore targeting strategies of 54k political advertisers who ran 2.5 million ads between August 2020 and December 2022. The findings indicate that election campaigns worldwide utilize targeted advertising. Most commonly, spending is allocated towards a single targeting criterion, however, in wealthier countries and electoral systems with proportional representation, a greater amount of money is spent on microtargeting by combining multiple criteria. Furthermore, targeting strategies vary along ideological lines of political parties who seek out voters more typically aligned with each side of the political spectrum. Nonetheless, parties use microtargeting irrespective of political ideology. Our findings offer the first comparative analysis of political microtargeting on Meta platforms for countries across all continents. Methodologically, we introduce a semi-automatic method to identify worldwide political advertisers using multiple data sources. Our study deepens the understanding of how country and party contexts explain differences in targeting strategies, highlighting the need for more research beyond the global north. Finally, our results have important implications for policy makers, and other stakeholders who seek to develop regulations to address the challenges posed by political microtargeting techniques.
谁是你的目标?
政治竞选活动越来越多地投资于社交媒体平台上的定向广告,以接触选民。尽管这对公民和选举有着至关重要的影响,但人们对各政党--尤其是在全球北方以外的国家--部署的定向策略知之甚少。本文对 113 次全国大选期间 95 个国家在 Facebook 和 Instagram 上的政治微定位做法进行了全面的描述性分析。通过分析 Meta Ad Targeting 数据集,我们探讨了在 2020 年 8 月至 2022 年 12 月期间投放了 250 万条广告的 54 千名政治广告商的定向策略。研究结果表明,全世界的竞选活动都在使用定向广告。然而,在较富裕的国家和实行比例代表制的选举制度中,更多的资金被用于结合多种标准的微定位。此外,各政党的目标定位策略也因意识形态的不同而各异,他们通常会寻找与政治光谱中每一方更一致的选民。不过,无论政治意识形态如何,政党都会使用微定位。我们的研究结果首次对各大洲国家 Meta 平台上的政治微目标进行了比较分析。在方法论上,我们引入了一种半自动方法,利用多种数据源识别全球政治广告商。我们的研究加深了人们对国家和政党背景如何解释定位策略差异的理解,强调了在全球北方之外开展更多研究的必要性。最后,我们的研究结果对政策制定者和其他利益相关者具有重要意义,他们需要制定相关法规来应对政治微定位技术带来的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信