RETHINKING THE MANAGEMENT OF HEALTH IN PEOPLE WITH DIABETES-RELATED FOOT ULCERS FROM AN AEP PERSPECTIVE: AN UPDATE FROM THE DFUEX STUDY

Dr Callum Baker, Dr Danqing Min, Professor Vivienne Chuter, Professor Stephen Twigg, A/Professor Nathan Johnson
{"title":"RETHINKING THE MANAGEMENT OF HEALTH IN PEOPLE WITH DIABETES-RELATED FOOT ULCERS FROM AN AEP PERSPECTIVE: AN UPDATE FROM THE DFUEX STUDY","authors":"Dr Callum Baker, Dr Danqing Min, Professor Vivienne Chuter, Professor Stephen Twigg, A/Professor Nathan Johnson","doi":"10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Current treatments for people with diabetes-related foot ulcers (DFUs) focus on foot outcomes - potentially at the expense of broader health and wellbeing considerations. There are barriers to exercise for people with DFU and hesitancy in promoting physical activity by clinicians. AEPs may have the clinical skills to help people with DFUs engage in safe and effective exercise. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of AEP supervised exercise intervention on cardiorespiratory fitness, health and wound healing in adults with DFU.\n \n \n \n Using a randomised control trial design (ANZTR registration: 12622000885796p) adults aged 18 to 70 years (n=32) with active DFU are being recruited from an interdisciplinary High-Risk Foot Service (iHRFS) at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney Australia, and randomised to receive 12 weeks of supervised exercise (aerobic and resistance) training (Exercise) with usual care or usual care (Control) Measurements including fitness, metabolic and wound outcomes are acquired at baseline and after 12 weeks.\n \n \n \n Preliminary baseline demographic, fitness and health data will be presented. Consideration for the scope of practice for AEPs in the multidisciplinary management of DFUs will be discussed incorporating observations and guidance on implementing exercise in a high risk DFU population, where there is limited patient and practitioner knowledge about safe and effective exercise options, and historical avoidance of physical activity to lessen the risk of wound deterioration. This will include consideration of aspects around exercise which are unique to people with DFUs, such as working with iHRFS, patient ambulation and transport, wound type and location, diversity of wound offloading devices and individual facilitators and barriers to exercise participation.\n \n \n \n There is a need for robust evidence concerning the efficacy and safety of exercise intervention, and a need for strategies to engage AEPs into the multidisciplinary care of people with DFUs. Supported by the Exercise and Sports Science Australia Research Grant.\n","PeriodicalId":92070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical exercise physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical exercise physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31189/2165-7629-13-s2.352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current treatments for people with diabetes-related foot ulcers (DFUs) focus on foot outcomes - potentially at the expense of broader health and wellbeing considerations. There are barriers to exercise for people with DFU and hesitancy in promoting physical activity by clinicians. AEPs may have the clinical skills to help people with DFUs engage in safe and effective exercise. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of AEP supervised exercise intervention on cardiorespiratory fitness, health and wound healing in adults with DFU. Using a randomised control trial design (ANZTR registration: 12622000885796p) adults aged 18 to 70 years (n=32) with active DFU are being recruited from an interdisciplinary High-Risk Foot Service (iHRFS) at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney Australia, and randomised to receive 12 weeks of supervised exercise (aerobic and resistance) training (Exercise) with usual care or usual care (Control) Measurements including fitness, metabolic and wound outcomes are acquired at baseline and after 12 weeks. Preliminary baseline demographic, fitness and health data will be presented. Consideration for the scope of practice for AEPs in the multidisciplinary management of DFUs will be discussed incorporating observations and guidance on implementing exercise in a high risk DFU population, where there is limited patient and practitioner knowledge about safe and effective exercise options, and historical avoidance of physical activity to lessen the risk of wound deterioration. This will include consideration of aspects around exercise which are unique to people with DFUs, such as working with iHRFS, patient ambulation and transport, wound type and location, diversity of wound offloading devices and individual facilitators and barriers to exercise participation. There is a need for robust evidence concerning the efficacy and safety of exercise intervention, and a need for strategies to engage AEPs into the multidisciplinary care of people with DFUs. Supported by the Exercise and Sports Science Australia Research Grant.
从 AEP 角度重新思考糖尿病足溃疡患者的健康管理:DFUEX 研究的最新情况
目前对糖尿病足溃疡(DFUs)患者的治疗主要集中在足部疗效上,这可能会牺牲更广泛的健康和福祉。糖尿病足溃疡患者在锻炼方面存在障碍,临床医生在推广体育锻炼方面也犹豫不决。AEPs可能具备帮助DFU患者进行安全有效锻炼的临床技能。本研究的目的是考察辅助医务人员指导运动干预对心肺功能、健康和伤口愈合的影响。 该研究采用随机对照试验设计(ANZTR注册号:12622000885796p),从澳大利亚悉尼皇家阿尔弗雷德王子医院(Royal Prince Alfred Hospital)的跨学科高风险足部服务(iHRFS)中招募年龄在18至70岁之间的活动性DFU成人(32人),并随机安排他们接受为期12周的有氧和阻力运动训练(运动)和常规护理或常规护理(对照)。 将提供初步的基线人口、体能和健康数据。将讨论AEPs在DFU多学科管理中的实践范围,包括在高风险DFU人群中实施运动的观察和指导,因为这些人群中的患者和从业人员对安全有效的运动选择了解有限,并且历来避免体育锻炼以降低伤口恶化的风险。这将包括考虑 DFU 患者所特有的运动方面的问题,如与 iHRFS 合作、患者行走和运输、伤口类型和位置、伤口卸载装置的多样性以及参与运动的个人促进因素和障碍。 我们需要有关运动干预的有效性和安全性的可靠证据,还需要制定策略,让AEP参与到DFU患者的多学科护理中。本研究由澳大利亚运动与体育科学研究基金(Exercise and Sports Science Australia Research Grant)资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信