Andrew G. Kim MD, Sandeep Banga MD, Qi Xuan Ang MD, Lalitsiri Atti MD, Harith Ghnaima MD, Saif AlAttal MD, Preeti Banga MD, Matthew D. Wilcox DO
{"title":"Transdermal bisoprolol for prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Andrew G. Kim MD, Sandeep Banga MD, Qi Xuan Ang MD, Lalitsiri Atti MD, Harith Ghnaima MD, Saif AlAttal MD, Preeti Banga MD, Matthew D. Wilcox DO","doi":"10.1002/joa3.13049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The transdermal patch of bisoprolol available in Japan has been reported to demonstrate superior efficacy in preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation, possibly surpassing its oral counterpart. However, there has been no systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the efficacy of transdermal bisoprolol.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A comprehensive systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane to identify all relevant studies assessing the efficacy of transdermal bisoprolol in preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation. The search covered studies from inception up to December 4, 2023. For data analysis, Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4 software was employed, using a random-effects model to calculate risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Three studies, comprising a total of 551 patients (transdermal bisoprolol 228 and control 323), were included. There was a decreased risk of postoperative atrial fibrillation or atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients treated with transdermal bisoprolol (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.27–0.67, <i>p</i> = .0002, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Transdermal administration of bisoprolol has consistently shown efficacy, and this pooled analysis supports its effectiveness. The heterogeneity of the included studies limits certain interpretations. Future randomized clinical trials may elucidate the superiority of transdermal administration over oral administration.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"40 3","pages":"434-439"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.13049","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.13049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The transdermal patch of bisoprolol available in Japan has been reported to demonstrate superior efficacy in preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation, possibly surpassing its oral counterpart. However, there has been no systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the efficacy of transdermal bisoprolol.
Methods
A comprehensive systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane to identify all relevant studies assessing the efficacy of transdermal bisoprolol in preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation. The search covered studies from inception up to December 4, 2023. For data analysis, Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4 software was employed, using a random-effects model to calculate risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results
Three studies, comprising a total of 551 patients (transdermal bisoprolol 228 and control 323), were included. There was a decreased risk of postoperative atrial fibrillation or atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients treated with transdermal bisoprolol (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.27–0.67, p = .0002, I2 = 0%).
Conclusion
Transdermal administration of bisoprolol has consistently shown efficacy, and this pooled analysis supports its effectiveness. The heterogeneity of the included studies limits certain interpretations. Future randomized clinical trials may elucidate the superiority of transdermal administration over oral administration.