A BWM-TOPSIS Linear Programming Model for Evaluating the Performance of Health-Promoting Hospitals with McKinsey 7s Framework in Organizational Management

Q4 Multidisciplinary
Amin Lawong, Arpakorn Kejornrak, Nuchsara Kriengkorakot, P. Kriengkorakot
{"title":"A BWM-TOPSIS Linear Programming Model for Evaluating the Performance of Health-Promoting Hospitals with McKinsey 7s Framework in Organizational Management","authors":"Amin Lawong, Arpakorn Kejornrak, Nuchsara Kriengkorakot, P. Kriengkorakot","doi":"10.59796/jcst.v14n2.2024.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research addresses the critical aspect of evaluating operational performance in health promotion hospitals, which play a vital role in providing medical services to local communities. The research proposes an integrated method for performance assessment, utilizing the Best-Worst Method (BWM) and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) linear programming model. Taking the case of health promotion hospitals in Maha Sarakham province, Thailand, and considering the McKinsey 7s framework's seven criteria, BWM is employed to determine the criteria weights. Subsequently, the TOPSIS linear programming model selects the ideal health promotion hospital based on these weights. The BWM analysis reveals criteria weights in the following order: system, staff, skill, style, structure, strategy, and shared value. The TOPSIS linear programming model identifies SH12 as the top-performing health promotion hospital with a closeness coefficient value of 0.8821. Additionally, a Spearman's rank correlation test validates this proposed method against the original TOPSIS approach, yielding a correlation value of 1.0. These findings provide valuable guidance for organizations, particularly in shaping strategic policies and resource allocation within medical service units, medical equipment, and personnel management in organizational settings. This study offers that the proposed method is simpler and will aid in the ongoing analysis of strengths and weaknesses in the improvement of organizations and development, helping organizations adapt to changes.","PeriodicalId":36369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59796/jcst.v14n2.2024.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research addresses the critical aspect of evaluating operational performance in health promotion hospitals, which play a vital role in providing medical services to local communities. The research proposes an integrated method for performance assessment, utilizing the Best-Worst Method (BWM) and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) linear programming model. Taking the case of health promotion hospitals in Maha Sarakham province, Thailand, and considering the McKinsey 7s framework's seven criteria, BWM is employed to determine the criteria weights. Subsequently, the TOPSIS linear programming model selects the ideal health promotion hospital based on these weights. The BWM analysis reveals criteria weights in the following order: system, staff, skill, style, structure, strategy, and shared value. The TOPSIS linear programming model identifies SH12 as the top-performing health promotion hospital with a closeness coefficient value of 0.8821. Additionally, a Spearman's rank correlation test validates this proposed method against the original TOPSIS approach, yielding a correlation value of 1.0. These findings provide valuable guidance for organizations, particularly in shaping strategic policies and resource allocation within medical service units, medical equipment, and personnel management in organizational settings. This study offers that the proposed method is simpler and will aid in the ongoing analysis of strengths and weaknesses in the improvement of organizations and development, helping organizations adapt to changes.
用麦肯锡 7s 组织管理框架评估健康促进医院绩效的 BWM-TOPSIS 线性编程模型
健康促进医院在为当地社区提供医疗服务方面发挥着重要作用,本研究探讨了健康促进医院运营绩效评估的关键问题。研究提出了一种综合绩效评估方法,利用了最佳-最差法(BWM)和与理想解决方案相似度排序技术(TOPSIS)线性规划模型。以泰国玛哈沙拉堪府的健康促进医院为例,考虑到麦肯锡 7s 框架的七项标准,采用最佳和最差法确定标准权重。随后,TOPSIS 线性规划模型根据这些权重选择理想的健康促进医院。BWM 分析显示标准权重依次为:系统、员工、技能、风格、结构、战略和共享价值。TOPSIS 线性规划模型确定 SH12 为表现最佳的健康促进医院,其接近系数为 0.8821。此外,斯皮尔曼等级相关性检验验证了这一建议方法与原始 TOPSIS 方法的相关性,相关值为 1.0。这些研究结果为组织提供了有价值的指导,特别是在医疗服务单位的战略政策制定和资源分配、医疗设备以及组织环境中的人事管理方面。本研究提出的方法较为简单,有助于持续分析组织改进和发展过程中的优势和劣势,帮助组织适应变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Current Science and Technology
Journal of Current Science and Technology Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信