Development of world class ski performance: Similarities and differences in pathways to expertise for freeskiers and cross-country skiers

Martine Aalberg, T. Roaas, M. A. Aune, Tore Kristian Aune
{"title":"Development of world class ski performance: Similarities and differences in pathways to expertise for freeskiers and cross-country skiers","authors":"Martine Aalberg, T. Roaas, M. A. Aune, Tore Kristian Aune","doi":"10.36950/2024.3ciss007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The overall purpose of the present study was to investigate similarities and differences in pathways to expertise for freeskiers and cross-country skiers. Specifically, 1) Entrance to the main sport, 2) Amount of training hours and organization of training, and 3) Variability in activities and content in training. Sampling athletes had to be on the highest level in their sport by competing in, e.g., the World Cup, World Championship, Olympic games, freeride World Tour. In total, 18 world-class skiers participated in the study. Eight freeskiers (age range 19-37) and ten cross-country skiers (age range 22-32 years). They answered a digital questionnaire designed to collect retrospective data describing their pathways to expertise. The first section elicits biographical information, age for entering sport and practice. The second section focused on sport-specific training, accumulated hours of training, and the distribution of organized versus self-organized training. The third section recalled the variability of activities they participated in and how they perceived the relevance of the content of different types of training for their sport-specific development. The results showed similarities in athletes’ entrance to the main sport, specialization age and total amount of training. At the same time, differences were observed in their training history regarding the organization of training. In contrast to cross-country skiers, freeskiers seem to be more self-organized and more involved in additional activities besides their main sport. Interestingly, the two groups of world-class athletes representing sports with distinctive demands share several common variables in their paths to expertise, amplified by perceived specificity. Practitioners and academics should substantiate patience in expertise development, driven by a multi-disciplinary understanding of distinct and individual characteristics or conditions that may be beneficial in fulfilling varied future demands. Hence, research should explore the rationale behind and potential learning effects between sports and training content.","PeriodicalId":508861,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS)","volume":"4 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36950/2024.3ciss007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The overall purpose of the present study was to investigate similarities and differences in pathways to expertise for freeskiers and cross-country skiers. Specifically, 1) Entrance to the main sport, 2) Amount of training hours and organization of training, and 3) Variability in activities and content in training. Sampling athletes had to be on the highest level in their sport by competing in, e.g., the World Cup, World Championship, Olympic games, freeride World Tour. In total, 18 world-class skiers participated in the study. Eight freeskiers (age range 19-37) and ten cross-country skiers (age range 22-32 years). They answered a digital questionnaire designed to collect retrospective data describing their pathways to expertise. The first section elicits biographical information, age for entering sport and practice. The second section focused on sport-specific training, accumulated hours of training, and the distribution of organized versus self-organized training. The third section recalled the variability of activities they participated in and how they perceived the relevance of the content of different types of training for their sport-specific development. The results showed similarities in athletes’ entrance to the main sport, specialization age and total amount of training. At the same time, differences were observed in their training history regarding the organization of training. In contrast to cross-country skiers, freeskiers seem to be more self-organized and more involved in additional activities besides their main sport. Interestingly, the two groups of world-class athletes representing sports with distinctive demands share several common variables in their paths to expertise, amplified by perceived specificity. Practitioners and academics should substantiate patience in expertise development, driven by a multi-disciplinary understanding of distinct and individual characteristics or conditions that may be beneficial in fulfilling varied future demands. Hence, research should explore the rationale behind and potential learning effects between sports and training content.
培养世界级滑雪运动员:自由式滑雪运动员和越野滑雪运动员专业技能发展途径的异同
本研究的总体目标是调查自由式滑雪运动员和越野滑雪运动员在获得专业技能的途径方面的异同。具体包括:1)进入主要运动项目;2)训练时数和训练组织;3)训练活动和内容的多样性。被抽样的运动员必须参加过世界杯、世界锦标赛、奥林匹克运动会、自由式滑雪世界巡回赛等比赛,在其运动项目中处于最高水平。共有 18 名世界级滑雪运动员参与了研究。其中包括 8 名自由式滑雪运动员(年龄在 19-37 岁之间)和 10 名越野滑雪运动员(年龄在 22-32 岁之间)。他们回答了一份数字问卷,该问卷旨在收集描述他们获得专业技能的途径的回顾性数据。问卷的第一部分收集了个人简历、参加运动的年龄和练习情况。第二部分侧重于体育专项训练、累计训练时数以及有组织训练与自行组织训练的分布情况。第三部分回顾了他们参加活动的差异性,以及他们如何看待不同类型的训练内容对其运动专项发展的相关性。结果显示,运动员在进入主要运动项目、专业化年龄和训练总量方面具有相似性。同时,在训练组织方面,他们的训练历史也存在差异。与越野滑雪运动员相比,自由式滑雪运动员似乎更有自我组织能力,除了主项运动外,他们还更多地参与其他活动。有趣的是,这两组世界级运动员所代表的运动项目有着不同的要求,他们在走向专业化的道路上有着几个共同的变量,而感知到的特殊性又放大了这些变量。从业人员和学术界应在多学科的推动下,对可能有利于满足未来不同需求的独特和个体特征或条件进行深入了解,从而在专业技能的发展过程中保持耐心。因此,研究应探索体育运动与培训内容之间的原理和潜在的学习效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信