Reinterpretation of the Thorpe Length Scale

Lakshmi Kantha
{"title":"Reinterpretation of the Thorpe Length Scale","authors":"Lakshmi Kantha","doi":"10.1175/jas-d-23-0137.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIn 1977, S. A. Thorpe proposed a method to estimate the dissipation rate ε of turbulence kinetic energy (TKE) in an overturning turbulent layer in a lake, by sorting the observed (unstable) density profile to render it stable and thus deriving a length scale LT named after him, from the resulting vertical displacements of water parcels. By further proposing that this purely empirical scale (with no a priori physical basis, unlike many other turbulence length scales) is proportional to the Ozmidov scale LO, definable only for stably (not unstably or neutrally) stratified flows, he was able to extract ε. The simplicity of the approach that requires nothing but CTD (Conductivity, Temperature and Depth) casts in water bodies, including lakes and oceans, made it attractive, until microstructure profilers were developed and perfected in later decades to actually make in-situ measurements of ε. Since equivalent microstructure devices are not available for the atmosphere, Thorpe technique has been resurrected in recent years for application to the atmosphere, using potential temperature profiles obtained from high vertical resolution radiosondes. Its popularity and utility have increased lately, in spite of unresolved issues related to the validity of assuming LT is proportional to LO. In this study, we touch upon these issues and offer an alternative interpretation of the Thorpe length scale as indicative of the turbulence velocity scale σK, which allows Thorpe sorting technique to be applied to all turbulent flows, including those generated by convection.","PeriodicalId":508177,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-23-0137.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1977, S. A. Thorpe proposed a method to estimate the dissipation rate ε of turbulence kinetic energy (TKE) in an overturning turbulent layer in a lake, by sorting the observed (unstable) density profile to render it stable and thus deriving a length scale LT named after him, from the resulting vertical displacements of water parcels. By further proposing that this purely empirical scale (with no a priori physical basis, unlike many other turbulence length scales) is proportional to the Ozmidov scale LO, definable only for stably (not unstably or neutrally) stratified flows, he was able to extract ε. The simplicity of the approach that requires nothing but CTD (Conductivity, Temperature and Depth) casts in water bodies, including lakes and oceans, made it attractive, until microstructure profilers were developed and perfected in later decades to actually make in-situ measurements of ε. Since equivalent microstructure devices are not available for the atmosphere, Thorpe technique has been resurrected in recent years for application to the atmosphere, using potential temperature profiles obtained from high vertical resolution radiosondes. Its popularity and utility have increased lately, in spite of unresolved issues related to the validity of assuming LT is proportional to LO. In this study, we touch upon these issues and offer an alternative interpretation of the Thorpe length scale as indicative of the turbulence velocity scale σK, which allows Thorpe sorting technique to be applied to all turbulent flows, including those generated by convection.
重新解释索普长度标尺
1977 年,索普(S. A. Thorpe)提出了一种估算湖泊翻转湍流层中湍流动能(TKE)耗散率 ε 的方法,即对观测到的(不稳定的)密度剖面进行排序,使其趋于稳定,从而根据由此产生的水团垂直位移推导出以他的名字命名的长度尺度 LT。通过进一步提出这一纯粹的经验尺度(与许多其他湍流长度尺度不同,它没有先验的物理基础)与奥兹米多夫尺度 LO 成比例,该尺度只适用于稳定(而非不稳定或中性)分层流,他就能够提取出 ε。这种方法很简单,只需要在水体(包括湖泊和海洋)中进行 CTD(电导率、温度和深度)测量,因此很有吸引力,直到后来几十年微结构剖面仪的发展和完善,才能真正对 ε 进行原位测量。尽管假定 LT 与 LO 成正比的有效性问题尚未解决,但该技术的受欢迎程度和实用性近来有所提高。在本研究中,我们探讨了这些问题,并提出了将索普长度尺度解释为湍流速度尺度σK的替代方案,从而使索普分选技术能够应用于所有湍流,包括由对流产生的湍流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信