Physical Activity of Undergraduate Students in Medicine and Physiotherapy Programmes in a Nigerian Medical University

Onigbinde A.T, Oluwagbotemi G.R, Ajao D.D, Borode A.O, Ayodeji A.O, Ugwu C.A, Ibitoye A.G
{"title":"Physical Activity of Undergraduate Students in Medicine and Physiotherapy Programmes in a Nigerian Medical University","authors":"Onigbinde A.T, Oluwagbotemi G.R, Ajao D.D, Borode A.O, Ayodeji A.O, Ugwu C.A, Ibitoye A.G","doi":"10.37506/j60s4z33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There appears to be dearth of empirical data to ascertain the physical activity level of Nigerian undergraduate students, especially among medical students. Hence, there would be need to investigate the physical activity level of students in a Nigeria university community. \nAim: The aims of the study were to assess and compare the physical activity of undergraduate students studying Medicine and Physiotherapy. \nMethods: Two hundred and sixteen undergraduate students studying Medicine and Physiotherapy were recruited using Stratified sampling technique. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire was administered to each student and the data generated was used to compute the Physical activity scores of each participant. Descriptive statistics and Inferential statistics of ANOVA and Independent t-test (student) were used to compare physical activity of the students. \nResults: The results obtained from this study showed skewness in the mean Physical Activity of students at different studying levels due to some that are physically hyperactive.  There was no significant difference in the overall Physical Activity of students studying medicine and physiotherapy.  However, there were significant differences in the vigorous physical activity of the students (F= 2.54, p = 0.04).  The mean vigorous physical activity of 500 level students studying physiotherapy was significantly higher than that of the 400 level students studying in both programmes (p=0.003 and p = 0.032 respectively). There were no significant differences between in the vigorous activity of the final year students in physiotherapy and medicines; and between male and female, although, the sitting PA of female undergraduate students was significantly higher that of male. \nConclusion: There was no significant difference in the total physical activity of students studying medicine and physiotherapy. Similarly, there was no significant difference in the physical activity of male and female students, excluding that of sitting component of physical activity score which was higher for the later.","PeriodicalId":516273,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy - An International Journal","volume":"31 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy - An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37506/j60s4z33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There appears to be dearth of empirical data to ascertain the physical activity level of Nigerian undergraduate students, especially among medical students. Hence, there would be need to investigate the physical activity level of students in a Nigeria university community. Aim: The aims of the study were to assess and compare the physical activity of undergraduate students studying Medicine and Physiotherapy. Methods: Two hundred and sixteen undergraduate students studying Medicine and Physiotherapy were recruited using Stratified sampling technique. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire was administered to each student and the data generated was used to compute the Physical activity scores of each participant. Descriptive statistics and Inferential statistics of ANOVA and Independent t-test (student) were used to compare physical activity of the students. Results: The results obtained from this study showed skewness in the mean Physical Activity of students at different studying levels due to some that are physically hyperactive.  There was no significant difference in the overall Physical Activity of students studying medicine and physiotherapy.  However, there were significant differences in the vigorous physical activity of the students (F= 2.54, p = 0.04).  The mean vigorous physical activity of 500 level students studying physiotherapy was significantly higher than that of the 400 level students studying in both programmes (p=0.003 and p = 0.032 respectively). There were no significant differences between in the vigorous activity of the final year students in physiotherapy and medicines; and between male and female, although, the sitting PA of female undergraduate students was significantly higher that of male. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the total physical activity of students studying medicine and physiotherapy. Similarly, there was no significant difference in the physical activity of male and female students, excluding that of sitting component of physical activity score which was higher for the later.
尼日利亚医科大学医学和物理治疗专业本科生的体育锻炼情况
背景:目前似乎缺乏实证数据来确定尼日利亚本科生,尤其是医科学生的体育锻炼水平。因此,有必要调查尼日利亚大学社区学生的体育锻炼水平。目的:本研究旨在评估和比较医学专业和物理治疗专业本科生的体育锻炼情况。研究方法采用分层抽样技术,招募了 216 名医学和物理治疗专业的本科生。对每名学生进行了国际体力活动问卷调查,并利用所产生的数据计算了每名参与者的体力活动得分。采用方差分析和独立 t 检验(学生)的描述性统计和推断性统计来比较学生的体力活动。结果研究结果显示,不同学习水平学生的平均体力活动量存在偏差,原因是有些学生体力活动过多。 医学专业和物理治疗专业学生的总体体力活动量没有明显差异。 然而,学生的剧烈运动量却存在明显差异(F= 2.54,P= 0.04)。 学习物理治疗的 500 级学生的平均剧烈运动量明显高于学习这两个课程的 400 级学生(分别为 p=0.003 和 p=0.032)。物理治疗学和药物学毕业班学生的剧烈活动量没有明显差异,男女生之间也没有明显差异,不过,本科女学生的坐位体力活动量明显高于男生。结论医学专业学生和物理治疗专业学生的总运动量没有明显差异。同样,男生和女生的体力活动量也没有明显差异,但坐姿体力活动量得分较高的情况除外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信