Psychometric Evaluation of the Thai Male Depression Risk Scale (MDRS-TH)

Q4 Multidisciplinary
Netchanok Kaewjanta, Chompoonoot Kabkumba, S. Rungreangkulkij, Simon Rice
{"title":"Psychometric Evaluation of the Thai Male Depression Risk Scale (MDRS-TH)","authors":"Netchanok Kaewjanta, Chompoonoot Kabkumba, S. Rungreangkulkij, Simon Rice","doi":"10.59796/jcst.v14n2.2024.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous studies have reported that males frequently suffer from major depression. However, due to the norms of masculine roles, in which emphasis is placed in displaying strength, invulnerability, and control, the ways that some men exhibit depression may differ from traditional diagnostic symptoms of major depressive disorder. To this end, the Male Depression Risk Scale (MDRS) has been developed in order to better identify those men, who experience low moods and are at risk for suicide. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Thai version of the MDRS (MDRS-TH). A cross-sectional study was conducted with 600 participants, who were recruited through social media (male N=300). The average age was 38.74 years. About half of the participants were married (51.5%). The majority identified themselves as Buddhist (94.66%) and had completed postgraduate education (31.16%). The samples had a variety of occupations, including farmer, employee, student, retired, own business, etc. The data were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and criterion-related validity using Pearson's correlation. The overall analysis (N=600) found that the MDRS-TH was consistent with the empirical data (CFI=0.918, TLI=0.905, SRMR=0.05, and RMSEA=0.05). The final model consisted of 5 components: 1) emotional suppression, 2) alcohol use, 3) anger & aggression, 4) somatic symptoms, and 5) risk-taking behaviors. The internal consistency of the MDRS-TH total score was 0.89, and the correlation criterion-related validity with the PHQ-9 was r=0.77. The results supported the fact that the MDRS-TH is a useful screening tool. Utilizing the MDRS-TH in primary care settings may assist to identify those men who are at risk for male-specific symptoms of depression so that early identification and intervention can be facilitated. In future studies, the generalizability of the scale would be strengthened if efforts to improve cross-cultural validation involving different cultural groups in Thailand were prioritized.","PeriodicalId":36369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59796/jcst.v14n2.2024.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies have reported that males frequently suffer from major depression. However, due to the norms of masculine roles, in which emphasis is placed in displaying strength, invulnerability, and control, the ways that some men exhibit depression may differ from traditional diagnostic symptoms of major depressive disorder. To this end, the Male Depression Risk Scale (MDRS) has been developed in order to better identify those men, who experience low moods and are at risk for suicide. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Thai version of the MDRS (MDRS-TH). A cross-sectional study was conducted with 600 participants, who were recruited through social media (male N=300). The average age was 38.74 years. About half of the participants were married (51.5%). The majority identified themselves as Buddhist (94.66%) and had completed postgraduate education (31.16%). The samples had a variety of occupations, including farmer, employee, student, retired, own business, etc. The data were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and criterion-related validity using Pearson's correlation. The overall analysis (N=600) found that the MDRS-TH was consistent with the empirical data (CFI=0.918, TLI=0.905, SRMR=0.05, and RMSEA=0.05). The final model consisted of 5 components: 1) emotional suppression, 2) alcohol use, 3) anger & aggression, 4) somatic symptoms, and 5) risk-taking behaviors. The internal consistency of the MDRS-TH total score was 0.89, and the correlation criterion-related validity with the PHQ-9 was r=0.77. The results supported the fact that the MDRS-TH is a useful screening tool. Utilizing the MDRS-TH in primary care settings may assist to identify those men who are at risk for male-specific symptoms of depression so that early identification and intervention can be facilitated. In future studies, the generalizability of the scale would be strengthened if efforts to improve cross-cultural validation involving different cultural groups in Thailand were prioritized.
泰国男性抑郁风险量表(MDRS-TH)的心理计量学评估
以往的研究报告显示,男性经常罹患重度抑郁症。然而,由于男性角色的规范强调表现出力量、不可侵犯性和控制力,一些男性表现出抑郁的方式可能与重度抑郁障碍的传统诊断症状不同。为此,我们开发了男性抑郁风险量表(MDRS),以便更好地识别那些情绪低落并有自杀风险的男性。本研究评估了泰语版男性抑郁风险量表(MDRS-TH)的心理测量特性。这项横断面研究通过社交媒体招募了 600 名参与者(男性人数=300)。平均年龄为 38.74 岁。约半数参与者已婚(51.5%)。大多数人认为自己是佛教徒(94.66%),并已完成研究生教育(31.16%)。样本的职业多种多样,包括农民、雇员、学生、退休人员、自己做生意等。数据分析采用了确认性因子分析、克朗巴赫α系数和皮尔逊相关性的标准相关效度。总体分析(N=600)发现,MDRS-TH 与经验数据一致(CFI=0.918,TLI=0.905,SRMR=0.05,RMSEA=0.05)。最终模型由 5 个部分组成:1)情绪压抑;2)饮酒;3)愤怒与攻击;4)躯体症状;5)冒险行为。MDRS-TH总分的内部一致性为0.89,与PHQ-9的标准相关效度r=0.77。结果证明,MDRS-TH 是一种有用的筛查工具。在初级医疗机构中使用 MDRS-TH 可能有助于识别那些有男性抑郁症状风险的男性,从而促进早期识别和干预。在未来的研究中,如果能优先考虑改进涉及泰国不同文化群体的跨文化验证工作,那么该量表的普适性将会得到加强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Current Science and Technology
Journal of Current Science and Technology Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信