Anticytokine Therapy and Corticosteroids for Cytokine Release Syndrome and for Neurotoxicity Following T-Cell Engager or CAR T-Cell Therapy

Cadth
{"title":"Anticytokine Therapy and Corticosteroids for Cytokine Release Syndrome and for Neurotoxicity Following T-Cell Engager or CAR T-Cell Therapy","authors":"Cadth","doi":"10.51731/cjht.2024.884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What Is the Issue? \n \nCytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) are the most common toxicities secondary to T-cell engager or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. \nThe US FDA and Health Canada approved tocilizumab, an anti-interleukin-6 receptor antagonist, for the management of severe or life-threatening cases of CRS. \nCorticosteroids also play an important role in CRS management and are the mainstay of ICANS management. \nDecision-makers are interested in understanding the use of anticytokine drugs (i.e., tocilizumab, anakinra, siltuximab) and/or corticosteroids in the management of CRS and ICANS following T-cell engager or CAR T-cell therapy. \n \nWhat Did We Do? \n \nWe identified and summarized the literature comparing the clinical effectiveness and safety of anticytokine therapy and/or corticosteroids with alternative care or treatment as usual for treating and preventing of CRS and ICANS. We also searched for evidence-based recommendations for the use of anticytokine therapy and/or corticosteroids to treat and prevent CRS and ICANS. \nA research information specialist conducted a literature search of peer-reviewed and grey literature sources published between January 1, 2019 and February 26, 2024 for CRS; and between January 1, 2019 and March 4, 2024 for ICANS. One reviewer screened citations for inclusion based on predefined criteria, critically appraised the included studies, and narratively summarized the findings. \n \nWhat Did We Find? \n \nThis report presents evidence-based findings on 3 retrospective chart review studies, 2 prospective cohort studies, and 4 consensus guidelines. \nLimited and low-quality clinical evidence from studies with a high risk of bias suggested that early use of tocilizumab or corticosteroids, or prophylactic use of tocilizumab or anakinra may reduce the risk of a high-grade CRS without a negative impact on neurotoxicity or immunotherapy treatment outcomes. \nThe included guidelines recommend the use of tocilizumab for treatment of higher-grade CRS, or for treatment of grade 1 CRS if symptoms persist for 3 days or more. Corticosteroids could be added in conjunction if there is no improvement or persistent symptoms after tocilizumab therapy. \nFor the management of ICANS in the absence of concurrent CRS, supportive care is the preferred treatment option for grade 1 ICANS, while corticosteroids are recommended for the management of grade 2 to 4 ICANS. In the presence of concurrent CRS, guidelines recommend tocilizumab therapy as per management of CRS, and corticosteroids should be continued until improvement to grade 1. \nWe did not identify any clinical evidence regarding the clinical efficacy and safety of anticytokine therapy and/or corticosteroids for treatment of CRS and ICANS compared with alternative treatment or treatment as usual. \nWe also did not identify any guidelines for the use of prophylactic anticytokine therapy, corticosteroids, or both for the prevention of CRS and ICANS. \n \nWhat Does This Mean? \n \nDespite limited and low-quality evidence, the findings suggest some potential benefits of prophylactic or early use of anticytokine therapy and corticosteroids for the management of immunotherapy-related toxicities. Guidelines offer guidance on the management of CRS, ICANS and other less common toxicities related to immunotherapy based on the available low-quality evidence. \nWhen using the clinical evidence and recommendations summarized in this report to inform decisions, decision-makers should consider that the evidence is limited and of low quality. \nTo improve the certainty of findings, there is a need for more robust prospective clinical trials with larger sample sizes, and lower risk of bias. \n","PeriodicalId":505661,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies","volume":"3 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51731/cjht.2024.884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What Is the Issue? Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) are the most common toxicities secondary to T-cell engager or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. The US FDA and Health Canada approved tocilizumab, an anti-interleukin-6 receptor antagonist, for the management of severe or life-threatening cases of CRS. Corticosteroids also play an important role in CRS management and are the mainstay of ICANS management. Decision-makers are interested in understanding the use of anticytokine drugs (i.e., tocilizumab, anakinra, siltuximab) and/or corticosteroids in the management of CRS and ICANS following T-cell engager or CAR T-cell therapy. What Did We Do? We identified and summarized the literature comparing the clinical effectiveness and safety of anticytokine therapy and/or corticosteroids with alternative care or treatment as usual for treating and preventing of CRS and ICANS. We also searched for evidence-based recommendations for the use of anticytokine therapy and/or corticosteroids to treat and prevent CRS and ICANS. A research information specialist conducted a literature search of peer-reviewed and grey literature sources published between January 1, 2019 and February 26, 2024 for CRS; and between January 1, 2019 and March 4, 2024 for ICANS. One reviewer screened citations for inclusion based on predefined criteria, critically appraised the included studies, and narratively summarized the findings. What Did We Find? This report presents evidence-based findings on 3 retrospective chart review studies, 2 prospective cohort studies, and 4 consensus guidelines. Limited and low-quality clinical evidence from studies with a high risk of bias suggested that early use of tocilizumab or corticosteroids, or prophylactic use of tocilizumab or anakinra may reduce the risk of a high-grade CRS without a negative impact on neurotoxicity or immunotherapy treatment outcomes. The included guidelines recommend the use of tocilizumab for treatment of higher-grade CRS, or for treatment of grade 1 CRS if symptoms persist for 3 days or more. Corticosteroids could be added in conjunction if there is no improvement or persistent symptoms after tocilizumab therapy. For the management of ICANS in the absence of concurrent CRS, supportive care is the preferred treatment option for grade 1 ICANS, while corticosteroids are recommended for the management of grade 2 to 4 ICANS. In the presence of concurrent CRS, guidelines recommend tocilizumab therapy as per management of CRS, and corticosteroids should be continued until improvement to grade 1. We did not identify any clinical evidence regarding the clinical efficacy and safety of anticytokine therapy and/or corticosteroids for treatment of CRS and ICANS compared with alternative treatment or treatment as usual. We also did not identify any guidelines for the use of prophylactic anticytokine therapy, corticosteroids, or both for the prevention of CRS and ICANS. What Does This Mean? Despite limited and low-quality evidence, the findings suggest some potential benefits of prophylactic or early use of anticytokine therapy and corticosteroids for the management of immunotherapy-related toxicities. Guidelines offer guidance on the management of CRS, ICANS and other less common toxicities related to immunotherapy based on the available low-quality evidence. When using the clinical evidence and recommendations summarized in this report to inform decisions, decision-makers should consider that the evidence is limited and of low quality. To improve the certainty of findings, there is a need for more robust prospective clinical trials with larger sample sizes, and lower risk of bias.
抗细胞因子疗法和皮质类固醇治疗细胞因子释放综合征以及 T 细胞激活剂或 CAR T 细胞疗法后的神经毒性
问题是什么? 细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)和免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)是T细胞吞噬或嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法最常见的继发性毒性。美国 FDA 和加拿大卫生部批准了抗白细胞介素-6 受体拮抗剂 tocilizumab,用于治疗严重或危及生命的 CRS 病例。皮质类固醇在 CRS 的治疗中也发挥着重要作用,是 ICANS 治疗的主要药物。决策者们有兴趣了解抗细胞因子药物(即托西珠单抗、阿纳金拉、西妥昔单抗)和/或皮质类固醇在T细胞接合剂或CAR T细胞疗法后的CRS和ICANS治疗中的应用。 我们做了什么? 我们对文献进行了鉴定和总结,比较了抗细胞因子治疗和/或皮质类固醇与治疗和预防 CRS 和 ICANS 的替代治疗或常规治疗的临床有效性和安全性。我们还搜索了使用抗细胞因子疗法和/或皮质类固醇治疗和预防 CRS 和 ICANS 的循证建议。一位研究信息专家对2019年1月1日至2024年2月26日期间发表的同行评审文献和灰色文献进行了文献检索,其中包括CRS;2019年1月1日至2024年3月4日期间发表的ICANS。一位审稿人根据预先定义的标准筛选了纳入的引文,对纳入的研究进行了严格的评估,并对研究结果进行了叙述性总结。 我们发现了什么? 本报告介绍了 3 项回顾性病历回顾研究、2 项前瞻性队列研究和 4 项共识指南的循证研究结果。来自偏倚风险较高的研究的有限且低质量的临床证据表明,早期使用托珠单抗或皮质类固醇,或预防性使用托珠单抗或阿纳金雷可降低高级别 CRS 的风险,而不会对神经毒性或免疫疗法的治疗效果产生负面影响。收录的指南建议使用托珠单抗治疗更高级别的CRS,或在症状持续3天或更长时间的情况下治疗1级CRS。如果托西珠单抗治疗后症状无改善或持续存在,可同时使用皮质类固醇。在没有并发 CRS 的情况下,治疗 1 级 ICANS 首选支持性护理,而治疗 2 至 4 级 ICANS 则建议使用皮质类固醇。在并发 CRS 的情况下,指南建议按照 CRS 的治疗方法使用托西珠单抗,并继续使用皮质类固醇激素,直至病情好转至 1 级。与其他治疗方法或常规治疗方法相比,我们没有找到任何有关抗细胞因子治疗和/或皮质类固醇治疗 CRS 和 ICANS 的临床疗效和安全性的临床证据。我们也未找到任何关于使用预防性抗水化因子疗法、皮质类固醇或同时使用这两种疗法来预防 CRS 和 ICANS 的指南。 这意味着什么? 尽管证据有限且质量不高,但研究结果表明,预防性或早期使用抗水化因子疗法和皮质类固醇治疗免疫疗法相关毒性反应可能会带来一些益处。根据现有的低质量证据,指南为CRS、ICANS和其他较少见的免疫疗法相关毒性反应的治疗提供了指导。在使用本报告总结的临床证据和建议进行决策时,决策者应考虑到证据有限且质量不高。为提高研究结果的确定性,需要进行更多样本量更大、偏倚风险更低的稳健前瞻性临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信