Qualitative service evaluation of a rural midwife-led ultrasound service: listening to women

Q2 Nursing
Lynn Jones
{"title":"Qualitative service evaluation of a rural midwife-led ultrasound service: listening to women","authors":"Lynn Jones","doi":"10.12968/bjom.2024.32.5.233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patient experience is needed to understand if a service is meeting the needs of the population it serves. In rural areas, accessing maternity services can be challenging for women. Local provision should be explored and consistently reviewed to adapt to changing social requirements and expectations. The aim of this study was to examine a rural midwifery-led ultrasound service 5 years after implementation and post COVID-19, to ascertain if the service provides a positive service user experience. A qualitative service evaluation was carried out using semi-structured interviews with four service users. Data were analysed using content analysis. Positive aspects of the service included continuity of care, communication, time to care, financial benefits and inclusivity in care and care decisions. It was noted that the ultrasound service was in the opposite direction from their homes to the obstetric service if participants needed to be referred for consultant opinion the same day. The significant underlying theme was the positive impact on mental wellbeing and patient experience in pregnancy when attending the service. There was a high level of satisfaction with the service. Engagement of a broader spectrum of women would provide deeper insight into the service and robust evidence for any service development.","PeriodicalId":52489,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Midwifery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2024.32.5.233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patient experience is needed to understand if a service is meeting the needs of the population it serves. In rural areas, accessing maternity services can be challenging for women. Local provision should be explored and consistently reviewed to adapt to changing social requirements and expectations. The aim of this study was to examine a rural midwifery-led ultrasound service 5 years after implementation and post COVID-19, to ascertain if the service provides a positive service user experience. A qualitative service evaluation was carried out using semi-structured interviews with four service users. Data were analysed using content analysis. Positive aspects of the service included continuity of care, communication, time to care, financial benefits and inclusivity in care and care decisions. It was noted that the ultrasound service was in the opposite direction from their homes to the obstetric service if participants needed to be referred for consultant opinion the same day. The significant underlying theme was the positive impact on mental wellbeing and patient experience in pregnancy when attending the service. There was a high level of satisfaction with the service. Engagement of a broader spectrum of women would provide deeper insight into the service and robust evidence for any service development.
对农村助产士主导的超声波服务进行定性服务评估:倾听妇女的心声
要了解一项服务是否满足了所服务人群的需求,就需要患者的体验。在农村地区,妇女获得产科服务可能具有挑战性。应探索并不断审查当地提供的服务,以适应不断变化的社会要求和期望。本研究旨在考察一项由助产士主导的农村超声波服务在实施 5 年后和 COVID-19 后的情况,以确定该服务是否为用户提供了积极的服务体验。通过对四名服务使用者进行半结构化访谈,对服务进行了定性评估。采用内容分析法对数据进行了分析。服务的积极方面包括护理的连续性、沟通、护理时间、经济效益以及护理和护理决策的包容性。我们注意到,如果参加者需要在同一天转诊听取顾问的意见,超声波服务与他们的家和产科服务方向相反。一个重要的基本主题是,参加该服务对患者的心理健康和孕期体验产生了积极影响。患者对服务的满意度很高。让更多的妇女参与进来,可以让她们更深入地了解这项服务,并为任何服务发展提供有力的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Midwifery
British Journal of Midwifery Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: British Journal of Midwifery (BJM) is the leading clinical journal for midwives. Published each month, the journal is written by midwives for midwives and peer reviewed by some of the foremost authorities in the profession. BJM is essential reading for all midwives. It contains the best clinical reviews, original research and evidence-based articles available, and ensures that midwives are kept fully up-to-date with the latest developments taking place in clinical practice. In addition, each issue of the journal contains a symposium on a particular theme, providing more in-depth clinical information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信