The use of AI Chatbots in higher education: the problem of plagiarism

Yeliena Prokhorova, Rashmi Gujrati, Hayri Uygun
{"title":"The use of AI Chatbots in higher education: the problem of plagiarism","authors":"Yeliena Prokhorova, Rashmi Gujrati, Hayri Uygun","doi":"10.37497/rev.artif.intell.educ.v5i00.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The use of ChatGPT in the learning process is becoming a common practice. Researchers identify opportunities to improve the learning process using AI tools. At the same time, there are many unresolved problems and threats from the use of ChatGPT. These include unreliable information, false information, lack of references to primary sources, lack of intellectual property protection, and especially the problem of plagiarism in academic texts. \nObjectives: The purpose of the study is to summarise the results of published research on the benefits and threats of using ChatGPT in higher education and to analyse the experience of using AI to write academic assignments by university students in compliance with the requirements of academic integrity. \nMethods: A survey was conducted among Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman (KNEU) students about their experience of using ChatGPT in performing academic tasks and the degree of satisfaction with this tool. \nResults: The survey involved 58 KNEU students. We have analysed how satisfied students are with using ChatGPT for different learning purposes. Students are most satisfied with using ChatGPT to quickly find information and translate texts. The majority of respondents said that ChatGPT does not always provide accurate and reliable information. Students also pointed to the problem of violating academic integrity when using ChatGPT to complete their assignments. \nConclusions: The study shows the general advantages and disadvantages of using ChatGPT in higher education. Particular attention should be paid to the level of borrowing in academic texts prepared with the help of ChatGPT.","PeriodicalId":473104,"journal":{"name":"Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37497/rev.artif.intell.educ.v5i00.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of ChatGPT in the learning process is becoming a common practice. Researchers identify opportunities to improve the learning process using AI tools. At the same time, there are many unresolved problems and threats from the use of ChatGPT. These include unreliable information, false information, lack of references to primary sources, lack of intellectual property protection, and especially the problem of plagiarism in academic texts. Objectives: The purpose of the study is to summarise the results of published research on the benefits and threats of using ChatGPT in higher education and to analyse the experience of using AI to write academic assignments by university students in compliance with the requirements of academic integrity. Methods: A survey was conducted among Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman (KNEU) students about their experience of using ChatGPT in performing academic tasks and the degree of satisfaction with this tool. Results: The survey involved 58 KNEU students. We have analysed how satisfied students are with using ChatGPT for different learning purposes. Students are most satisfied with using ChatGPT to quickly find information and translate texts. The majority of respondents said that ChatGPT does not always provide accurate and reliable information. Students also pointed to the problem of violating academic integrity when using ChatGPT to complete their assignments. Conclusions: The study shows the general advantages and disadvantages of using ChatGPT in higher education. Particular attention should be paid to the level of borrowing in academic texts prepared with the help of ChatGPT.
在高等教育中使用人工智能聊天机器人:抄袭问题
背景:在学习过程中使用 ChatGPT 已成为一种普遍做法。研究人员发现了使用人工智能工具改善学习过程的机会。与此同时,使用 ChatGPT 也存在许多尚未解决的问题和威胁。这些问题包括信息不可靠、信息虚假、缺乏原始资料参考、缺乏知识产权保护,尤其是学术文本中的抄袭问题。研究目的本研究的目的是总结已发表的关于在高等教育中使用 ChatGPT 的益处和威胁的研究成果,并分析大学生在遵守学术诚信要求的前提下使用人工智能撰写学术作业的经验。调查方法对基辅国立经济大学(Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman (KNEU))的学生使用 ChatGPT 完成学术任务的经验以及对该工具的满意度进行了调查。调查结果:调查涉及 58 名乌克兰国立经济大学的学生。我们分析了学生在不同学习目的下使用 ChatGPT 的满意度。学生最满意的是使用 ChatGPT 快速查找信息和翻译文本。大多数受访者表示,ChatGPT 并不总能提供准确可靠的信息。学生们还指出了使用 ChatGPT 完成作业时违反学术诚信的问题。结论本研究显示了在高等教育中使用 ChatGPT 的总体利弊。应特别注意借助 ChatGPT 编写的学术文章中的借用水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书