Contribution of Virtual Reality to the Reproduction of Social Interaction characteristics in Neuropsychology: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Maxime Jollivet, Jérémy Besnard, Frédéric Banville, Philippe Allain
{"title":"Contribution of Virtual Reality to the Reproduction of Social Interaction characteristics in Neuropsychology: A Systematic Review of the Literature","authors":"Maxime Jollivet, Jérémy Besnard, Frédéric Banville, Philippe Allain","doi":"10.1162/pres_a_00424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Sociocognitive difficulties are observed in many pathologies associated with brain lesions or atypical brain functioning. The development of virtual reality offers an opportunity to assess this dimension from an interactionist perspective and to increase the ecological validity of the material used. However, this approach can be operationalized and conceptualized in a variety of ways. To understand these aspects, we conducted a systematic review of articles found in the PubMed, PubMed Central and ScienceDirect databases, following PRISMA-P guidelines. A corpus of 48 articles was identified and analyzed in terms of the experimental devices used, to gauge the extent to which they reproduced the characteristics of real-world social interactions, as well as the associated conceptions. Results suggested that interactionist research lies on a continuum between ecological validity (studies exploring interactions via general functions) and a high level of experimental control (exploration of interactions with respect to specific processes). They are discussed in terms of the operationalization and objectification of interactionism.","PeriodicalId":501553,"journal":{"name":"PRESENCE: Virtual and Augmented Reality","volume":"98 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRESENCE: Virtual and Augmented Reality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/pres_a_00424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sociocognitive difficulties are observed in many pathologies associated with brain lesions or atypical brain functioning. The development of virtual reality offers an opportunity to assess this dimension from an interactionist perspective and to increase the ecological validity of the material used. However, this approach can be operationalized and conceptualized in a variety of ways. To understand these aspects, we conducted a systematic review of articles found in the PubMed, PubMed Central and ScienceDirect databases, following PRISMA-P guidelines. A corpus of 48 articles was identified and analyzed in terms of the experimental devices used, to gauge the extent to which they reproduced the characteristics of real-world social interactions, as well as the associated conceptions. Results suggested that interactionist research lies on a continuum between ecological validity (studies exploring interactions via general functions) and a high level of experimental control (exploration of interactions with respect to specific processes). They are discussed in terms of the operationalization and objectification of interactionism.
虚拟现实对再现神经心理学中的社会互动特征的贡献:文献系统回顾
在许多与脑损伤或非典型性脑功能相关的病症中,都能观察到社会认知困难。虚拟现实技术的发展提供了一个机会,可以从互动主义的角度对这一维度进行评估,并提高所用材料的生态有效性。然而,这种方法可以通过多种方式进行操作和概念化。为了了解这些方面,我们按照 PRISMA-P 准则,对 PubMed、PubMed Central 和 ScienceDirect 数据库中的文章进行了系统性审查。我们确定了 48 篇文章的语料库,并根据所使用的实验手段对其进行了分析,以衡量它们在多大程度上再现了现实世界中社会互动的特征以及相关概念。研究结果表明,交互作用研究介于生态有效性(通过一般功能探索交互作用的研究)和高水平实验控制(针对特定过程探索交互作用)之间。本文从交互作用的操作化和客观化角度对这些研究进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信