{"title":"Divine presence and absence: A theodicy of narrative analytic theology","authors":"Aku S. Antombikums","doi":"10.4102/ve.v45i1.3058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For centuries, philosophers and theologians debated how to reconcile the existence of an all-powerful, all-loving, and ever-present God with the problem of evil. However, the question of why the righteous suffer remains unanswered. Given the omnipresence of God, one wonders why the sufferers experience what seems like God’s absence in their adversity. This study presents a theodicy of narrative analytic theology because the experiences of the saints of old compel us to rethink our approach to the problem of evil from the ‘God’s-eye view’ to the experiential and existential worries of the sufferer. The study looks at the story of Job and Daniel and his friends in Babylon. The narrative theodicy approach helps us understand why the righteous never denounced God in the Old Testament. The New Testament, in line with the Old Testament, reveals a suffering motif of the saints, which includes participation in the atoning work of Christ and the purification of the souls of the sufferer. Nevertheless, it seems some evils are pointless. The sufferers do not see their suffering as a punishment or a weakness from God but as a distraction and a test to perfect their covenantal relationship with the Triune. Ultimately, the suffering of the righteous will be overcome at the eschaton.Intradisciplinary and/or interdisciplinary implications: This article aligns with the scope of Verbum et Ecclesia. It contributes to the current discussion on the problem of suffering within the broad discipline of theology, philosophy of religion, and how narrative analytic theology can enhance our response to the problem of evil.","PeriodicalId":38411,"journal":{"name":"Verbum et Ecclesia","volume":"50 219","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Verbum et Ecclesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v45i1.3058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
For centuries, philosophers and theologians debated how to reconcile the existence of an all-powerful, all-loving, and ever-present God with the problem of evil. However, the question of why the righteous suffer remains unanswered. Given the omnipresence of God, one wonders why the sufferers experience what seems like God’s absence in their adversity. This study presents a theodicy of narrative analytic theology because the experiences of the saints of old compel us to rethink our approach to the problem of evil from the ‘God’s-eye view’ to the experiential and existential worries of the sufferer. The study looks at the story of Job and Daniel and his friends in Babylon. The narrative theodicy approach helps us understand why the righteous never denounced God in the Old Testament. The New Testament, in line with the Old Testament, reveals a suffering motif of the saints, which includes participation in the atoning work of Christ and the purification of the souls of the sufferer. Nevertheless, it seems some evils are pointless. The sufferers do not see their suffering as a punishment or a weakness from God but as a distraction and a test to perfect their covenantal relationship with the Triune. Ultimately, the suffering of the righteous will be overcome at the eschaton.Intradisciplinary and/or interdisciplinary implications: This article aligns with the scope of Verbum et Ecclesia. It contributes to the current discussion on the problem of suffering within the broad discipline of theology, philosophy of religion, and how narrative analytic theology can enhance our response to the problem of evil.
几个世纪以来,哲学家和神学家一直在争论如何将全能、慈爱、无处不在的上帝的存在与邪恶问题相协调。然而,义人为何受苦的问题仍然没有答案。既然上帝无所不在,人们不禁要问,为什么受苦受难者在逆境中体验到的似乎是上帝的缺席。本研究提出了一种叙事分析神学,因为古代圣徒的经历迫使我们从 "上帝视角 "到受难者的体验和生存忧虑,重新思考我们处理邪恶问题的方法。本研究探讨了约伯和但以理以及他在巴比伦的朋友们的故事。叙事神学的方法有助于我们理解为什么义人在旧约中从不谴责上帝。新约》与《旧约》一致,揭示了圣徒受苦的主题,其中包括参与基督的赎罪工作和受苦者灵魂的净化。然而,有些罪恶似乎毫无意义。受难者并不认为他们所受的苦难是来自上帝的惩罚或软弱,而是为了完善他们与三位一体上帝的盟约关系而进行的分心和考验。最终,义人的苦难将在末世得到克服:本文与 Verbum et Ecclesia 的范围一致。它有助于当前在神学、宗教哲学等广泛学科中对苦难问题的讨论,以及叙事分析神学如何增强我们对邪恶问题的回应。