{"title":"Evaluation of the Physical Properties of Different Bioceramic-Based Root Canal Sealers","authors":"Deniz Burcu Mert, Nimet Gençoğlu","doi":"10.14235/bas.galenos.2024.84429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the physicochemical properties of different bioceramic-based root canal sealers. Methods: Five bioceramic-based sealers; MTA Fillapex, TotalFill BC Sealer, BioRoot RCS, GuttaFlow Bioseal, Dia-Root Bio Sealer were compared with epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus) for this purpose. Ten samples of each sealer were prepared in according to the manufacturers’ instructions and evaluated for radiopacity, solubility, flow and dimensional change tests. The data were statistically analyzed using One-Way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests (p<0.05). Results: The AH Plus showed statistically higher radioopacity than all tested bioceramic-based sealers (p<0.01). A significantly higher solubility rate was observed for TotalFill BC Sealer (p<0.01). Dia-Root Bio Sealer, BioRoot RCS and AH Plus showed solubility rate less than 3% in compliance with ISO standards. TotalFill BC Sealer and MTA Fillapex showed higher flow rates than other tested sealers (p<0.01). Dia-Root Bio Sealer, GuttaFlow Bioseal, BioRoot RCS, TotalFill BC Sealer and AH Plus exhibited expansion above","PeriodicalId":503359,"journal":{"name":"Bezmialem Science","volume":"111 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bezmialem Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14235/bas.galenos.2024.84429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the physicochemical properties of different bioceramic-based root canal sealers. Methods: Five bioceramic-based sealers; MTA Fillapex, TotalFill BC Sealer, BioRoot RCS, GuttaFlow Bioseal, Dia-Root Bio Sealer were compared with epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus) for this purpose. Ten samples of each sealer were prepared in according to the manufacturers’ instructions and evaluated for radiopacity, solubility, flow and dimensional change tests. The data were statistically analyzed using One-Way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests (p<0.05). Results: The AH Plus showed statistically higher radioopacity than all tested bioceramic-based sealers (p<0.01). A significantly higher solubility rate was observed for TotalFill BC Sealer (p<0.01). Dia-Root Bio Sealer, BioRoot RCS and AH Plus showed solubility rate less than 3% in compliance with ISO standards. TotalFill BC Sealer and MTA Fillapex showed higher flow rates than other tested sealers (p<0.01). Dia-Root Bio Sealer, GuttaFlow Bioseal, BioRoot RCS, TotalFill BC Sealer and AH Plus exhibited expansion above
研究目的本研究旨在评估不同生物陶瓷根管封闭剂的理化特性。方法为此,将五种生物陶瓷封闭剂(MTA Fillapex、TotalFill BC Sealer、BioRoot RCS、GuttaFlow Bioseal、Dia-Root Bio Sealer)与环氧树脂封闭剂(AH Plus)进行比较。按照生产商的说明制备了每种封闭剂的十个样品,并对其进行了放射韧性、溶解性、流动性和尺寸变化测试。数据采用单向方差分析和 Tukey 事后检验进行统计分析(P<0.05)。结果:与所有测试过的生物陶瓷封闭剂相比,AH Plus 显示出更高的放射容积(p<0.01)。TotalFill BC 封闭剂的溶解率明显更高(p<0.01)。Dia-Root Bio Sealer、BioRoot RCS 和 AH Plus 的溶解度低于 3%,符合 ISO 标准。与其他测试过的封闭剂相比,TotalFill BC 封闭剂和 MTA Fillapex 的流速更高(p<0.01)。Dia-Root Bio Sealer、GuttaFlow Bioseal、BioRoot RCS、TotalFill BC Sealer 和 AH Plus 的膨胀率超过了 ISO 标准。