Nothingness and Paraconsistent Logic

Hinna Khaan
{"title":"Nothingness and Paraconsistent Logic","authors":"Hinna Khaan","doi":"10.36446/rlf2024399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the concept of “Nothingness” and its connection to Graham Priest’s paraconsistent logic, with a critical focus on Heidegger's ontological perspective. Heidegger argues that logic and ontology are incompatible, and truth extends beyond mere propositions, tied to the indescribable experience of “Nothing.” He contends that logical rules are not essential for ontological truth, leading to two conceptions of truth: fundamental and propositional. The study delves into this profound examination, considering the implications for understanding truth and the limitations of logic in grasping the elusive aspects of existence.","PeriodicalId":203324,"journal":{"name":"REVISTA LATINOAMERICANA DE FILOSOFÍA","volume":"109 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVISTA LATINOAMERICANA DE FILOSOFÍA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36446/rlf2024399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores the concept of “Nothingness” and its connection to Graham Priest’s paraconsistent logic, with a critical focus on Heidegger's ontological perspective. Heidegger argues that logic and ontology are incompatible, and truth extends beyond mere propositions, tied to the indescribable experience of “Nothing.” He contends that logical rules are not essential for ontological truth, leading to two conceptions of truth: fundamental and propositional. The study delves into this profound examination, considering the implications for understanding truth and the limitations of logic in grasping the elusive aspects of existence.
虚无与准一致逻辑
本文探讨了 "虚无 "的概念及其与格雷厄姆-普利斯特的准逻辑学的联系,并批判性地关注了海德格尔的本体论观点。海德格尔认为,逻辑学与本体论是不相容的,真理超越了单纯的命题,与 "无 "的不可描述的体验联系在一起。他认为逻辑规则对于本体论的真理并不是必不可少的,这导致了两种真理概念:基本概念和命题概念。本研究深入探讨了这一深刻的问题,思考了对真理的理解的意义,以及逻辑在把握存在的难以捉摸的方面时的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信