Hyperlocal Air Pollution in London: Validating Low-Cost Sensors for Mobile Measurements from Vehicles

Hugo S. Russell*, Louise B. Frederickson*, Martin O. B. Sørensen, Johan A. Schmidt, Ole Hertel and Matthew S. Johnson, 
{"title":"Hyperlocal Air Pollution in London: Validating Low-Cost Sensors for Mobile Measurements from Vehicles","authors":"Hugo S. Russell*,&nbsp;Louise B. Frederickson*,&nbsp;Martin O. B. Sørensen,&nbsp;Johan A. Schmidt,&nbsp;Ole Hertel and Matthew S. Johnson,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsestair.3c00043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >This study assesses low-cost sensors (LCS) for the mobile monitoring of air quality, which has thus far been scarcely investigated. NO<sub>2</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> were measured using LCS and higher-grade instruments while driving across various environments in London (943 km) and northern Europe (2923 km), including urban areas, motorways, and tunnels. The data were classified according to the environment where the measurements were carried out, and the performances of LCS and higher-grade instruments were compared. Results indicate that the performances of the sensors were influenced by the rate of change in pollutant concentration in different environments and not by vehicle speed. Excluding tunnel environments, overall, the particulate matter sensors correlated better with their higher-grade instrument than the electrochemical (EC) sensors, with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> values from 0.90–0.96 in the different environments, compared with 0.39–0.72 for the EC sensors. Tunnels presented a unique opportunity to test the time response of the systems, given the rapid change in concentration upon entering, and all sensors showed limited response times. This is the first time that EC NO<sub>2</sub> sensors have been rigorously tested against reference monitors while mobile. Their absolute measurements appear unaffected by movement; however, their time resolution may not be high enough for mobile monitoring in highly variable environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":100014,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T Air","volume":"1 6","pages":"438–450"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T Air","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestair.3c00043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study assesses low-cost sensors (LCS) for the mobile monitoring of air quality, which has thus far been scarcely investigated. NO2 and PM2.5 were measured using LCS and higher-grade instruments while driving across various environments in London (943 km) and northern Europe (2923 km), including urban areas, motorways, and tunnels. The data were classified according to the environment where the measurements were carried out, and the performances of LCS and higher-grade instruments were compared. Results indicate that the performances of the sensors were influenced by the rate of change in pollutant concentration in different environments and not by vehicle speed. Excluding tunnel environments, overall, the particulate matter sensors correlated better with their higher-grade instrument than the electrochemical (EC) sensors, with R2 values from 0.90–0.96 in the different environments, compared with 0.39–0.72 for the EC sensors. Tunnels presented a unique opportunity to test the time response of the systems, given the rapid change in concentration upon entering, and all sensors showed limited response times. This is the first time that EC NO2 sensors have been rigorously tested against reference monitors while mobile. Their absolute measurements appear unaffected by movement; however, their time resolution may not be high enough for mobile monitoring in highly variable environments.

Abstract Image

伦敦超本地空气污染:验证用于车辆移动测量的低成本传感器
本研究评估了用于移动监测空气质量的低成本传感器(LCS),迄今为止,对这一领域的研究还很少。在伦敦(943 公里)和北欧(2923 公里)的各种环境中,包括市区、高速公路和隧道,使用 LCS 和更高级的仪器测量了 NO2 和 PM2.5。根据进行测量的环境对数据进行了分类,并对 LCS 和更高级仪器的性能进行了比较。结果表明,传感器的性能受不同环境中污染物浓度变化率的影响,而不受车速的影响。如果不考虑隧道环境,总体而言,颗粒物传感器与更高级仪器的相关性要好于电化学(EC)传感器,在不同环境下的 R2 值为 0.90-0.96,而电化学传感器的 R2 值为 0.39-0.72。考虑到进入隧道后浓度的快速变化,隧道为测试系统的时间响应提供了一个独特的机会,所有传感器都显示出有限的响应时间。这是首次在移动状态下根据参考监测仪对导电率二氧化氮传感器进行严格测试。它们的绝对测量值似乎不受移动的影响;不过,它们的时间分辨率可能不够高,不适合在高度多变的环境中进行移动监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信