Like minds think alike: impacts of cultural and trust congruences on joint innovation

Mingjie Fang, Mengmeng Wang
{"title":"Like minds think alike: impacts of cultural and trust congruences on joint innovation","authors":"Mingjie Fang, Mengmeng Wang","doi":"10.1108/ccsm-09-2023-0199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeEngaging suppliers in joint innovation can be an effective means for buyer firms to overcome internal resource/capability limitations. The purpose of this research is to investigate the impacts of cultural and trust congruences between the supplier and buyer firms on joint innovation. In addition, we examine the relationship commitment as an antecedent of cultural and trust congruences.Design/methodology/approachThe study constructs a theoretical model based on social exchange theory (SET) and examines it using data from Chinese manufacturing firms.FindingsThe results suggest that cultural and trust congruences between suppliers and buyers positively influence joint processes and product innovations. Furthermore, we find that while normative relationship commitments of supplier firms promote cultural and trust congruences with buyers, instrumental relationship commitments only positively affect trust congruence.Originality/valueThis study enhances our understanding of social exchanges by adopting a dyadic view to examine the interconnectedness between relationship commitment, cultural and trust congruences, and joint innovation. These findings also offer practical managerial implications for managing collaborative innovation projects.","PeriodicalId":373772,"journal":{"name":"Cross Cultural & Strategic Management","volume":"36 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cross Cultural & Strategic Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ccsm-09-2023-0199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeEngaging suppliers in joint innovation can be an effective means for buyer firms to overcome internal resource/capability limitations. The purpose of this research is to investigate the impacts of cultural and trust congruences between the supplier and buyer firms on joint innovation. In addition, we examine the relationship commitment as an antecedent of cultural and trust congruences.Design/methodology/approachThe study constructs a theoretical model based on social exchange theory (SET) and examines it using data from Chinese manufacturing firms.FindingsThe results suggest that cultural and trust congruences between suppliers and buyers positively influence joint processes and product innovations. Furthermore, we find that while normative relationship commitments of supplier firms promote cultural and trust congruences with buyers, instrumental relationship commitments only positively affect trust congruence.Originality/valueThis study enhances our understanding of social exchanges by adopting a dyadic view to examine the interconnectedness between relationship commitment, cultural and trust congruences, and joint innovation. These findings also offer practical managerial implications for managing collaborative innovation projects.
志同道合:文化和信任一致性对联合创新的影响
目的 让供应商参与联合创新是买方企业克服内部资源/能力限制的有效手段。本研究旨在探讨供应商和买方企业之间的文化和信任一致性对联合创新的影响。研究结果研究结果表明,供应商和买方之间的文化和信任一致性会对联合流程和产品创新产生积极影响。此外,我们还发现,虽然供应商企业的规范性关系承诺会促进与买方的文化和信任一致性,但工具性关系承诺只会对信任一致性产生积极影响。这些发现还为管理合作创新项目提供了实际的管理意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信