Learning approaches of undergraduate medical students at exit and entry of their medical schools.

Nighat Haroon Khan, Dr. Nighat Haroon, Khan
{"title":"Learning approaches of undergraduate medical students at exit and entry of their medical schools.","authors":"Nighat Haroon Khan, Dr. Nighat Haroon, Khan","doi":"10.29309/tpmj/2024.31.05.8082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To Compare the learning approaches of medical students at the exit and entry of their medical school, to evaluate the influence of gender and to look for factors leading students towards a change in their learning approach, if any, through interviews. Study Design: Concurrent Mixed Method study. Setting: Ameer-ud-deen Medical College, Lahore. Period: March 2021 to March 2022. Methods: Sequential mixed method 100 first year and 100 Final year MBBS students were included in the study for quantitative analysis. ASSIST Questionnaire is used for identifying student’s approach to studying as either deep, surface or strategic and the correlation of gender with preference of study approach. Descriptive statistics wer`e performed. Student’s t-test was used for statistical comparisons. Qualitative data was collected through in depth semi structured interviews of final year students. Thematic analysis was done to interpret the data and triangulation method was used for validation. Results: There is an over-all predominance of deep approach in the both first and final year MBBS students. The number of first-year students employing a strategic approach were significantly in majority as compared to final year students doing the same. No significant difference is seen in the learning approaches of male and female students. Interviews indicated reasons of shifting away from strategic learning approach in the final year medical students. No significant difference was seen in the selection of approach between female and male students of both groups. Conclusion: Study suggests that there is a predominance of deep approach in the medical students both at exit and entry points. This is due to their clinical exposure and environment, assessment methodologies, curriculum planning, seniors and peer pressure and most importantly their immediate teachers. The more we understand these learning styles, the better we can guide our future generations towards deep learning and improve their attitude and professional skills.","PeriodicalId":22991,"journal":{"name":"The professional medical journal","volume":"123 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The professional medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29309/tpmj/2024.31.05.8082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To Compare the learning approaches of medical students at the exit and entry of their medical school, to evaluate the influence of gender and to look for factors leading students towards a change in their learning approach, if any, through interviews. Study Design: Concurrent Mixed Method study. Setting: Ameer-ud-deen Medical College, Lahore. Period: March 2021 to March 2022. Methods: Sequential mixed method 100 first year and 100 Final year MBBS students were included in the study for quantitative analysis. ASSIST Questionnaire is used for identifying student’s approach to studying as either deep, surface or strategic and the correlation of gender with preference of study approach. Descriptive statistics wer`e performed. Student’s t-test was used for statistical comparisons. Qualitative data was collected through in depth semi structured interviews of final year students. Thematic analysis was done to interpret the data and triangulation method was used for validation. Results: There is an over-all predominance of deep approach in the both first and final year MBBS students. The number of first-year students employing a strategic approach were significantly in majority as compared to final year students doing the same. No significant difference is seen in the learning approaches of male and female students. Interviews indicated reasons of shifting away from strategic learning approach in the final year medical students. No significant difference was seen in the selection of approach between female and male students of both groups. Conclusion: Study suggests that there is a predominance of deep approach in the medical students both at exit and entry points. This is due to their clinical exposure and environment, assessment methodologies, curriculum planning, seniors and peer pressure and most importantly their immediate teachers. The more we understand these learning styles, the better we can guide our future generations towards deep learning and improve their attitude and professional skills.
医学院本科生在毕业和入学时的学习方法。
目的比较医学院学生在毕业和入学时的学习方法,评估性别的影响,并通过访谈寻找导致学生改变学习方法的因素(如果有的话)。研究设计:并行混合法研究。研究地点拉合尔阿米尔-乌德-丁医学院。时间:2021 年 3 月至 2022 年 3 月2021 年 3 月至 2022 年 3 月。方法:顺序混合法采用顺序混合法对 100 名一年级和 100 名最后一年的 MBBS 学生进行定量分析。ASSIST 问卷用于确定学生的学习方法是深层学习法、表层学习法还是战略学习法,以及性别与学习方法偏好的相关性。进行了描述性统计。统计比较采用学生 t 检验。定性数据是通过对毕业班学生进行深入的半结构式访谈收集的。采用主题分析法对数据进行解释,并使用三角测量法进行验证。结果在医学学士学位一年级和毕业班学生中,采用深度方法的学生占绝大多数。采用战略方法的一年级学生明显多于采用同样方法的毕业班学生。男女学生在学习方法上没有明显差异。访谈显示了最后一年医科学生放弃战略学习方法的原因。两组男女学生在学习方法的选择上没有明显差异。结论研究表明,医科学生在毕业和入学时均以深度学习法为主。这是由于他们的临床接触和环境、评估方法、课程规划、学长和同学的压力,以及最重要的是他们的直接老师。我们对这些学习方式了解得越多,就越能更好地引导我们的下一代进行深度学习,改善他们的学习态度和专业技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信