Comparison of Weights in Weighted Least Square Method For Handling Heteroscedasticity on Multiple Regression Model

F. Virgantari, Maya Widyastiti, Natalia Ir Seno
{"title":"Comparison of Weights in Weighted Least Square Method For Handling Heteroscedasticity on Multiple Regression Model","authors":"F. Virgantari, Maya Widyastiti, Natalia Ir Seno","doi":"10.46336/ijmsc.v2i2.93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regression analysis is the most popular and commonly used to determine causality between two or more variables. In regression analysis there are several assumptions that must be held, so that the property of the best linear unbiased estimator (BLUE) is still guaranteed. In fact, we often found violations of the assumptions.  One of them was violations of the homoscedasticity or occurs heteroscedasticity. The impact of heteroscedasticity in the regression model is that the ordinary least square (OLS) estimator no longer has a minimum variance although still linear and unbiased. To handle this, weighted least square (WLS) regression is used instead, which giving weights on the observations. But the problem often encountered is choosing which the best weight in WLS method. This paper aimed to compare and determine the best weight among 1/X, 1/ , 1/Y and 1/s in multiple regression model. Human development index factors data, which were obtained from the Indonesian Central Bureau of Statistics, were used. The results showed that the best weight on human development index data was 1/s.  The coefficient of determination was 98.7% indicating that the model was very good.","PeriodicalId":517271,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mathematics, Statistics, and Computing","volume":"289 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mathematics, Statistics, and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46336/ijmsc.v2i2.93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regression analysis is the most popular and commonly used to determine causality between two or more variables. In regression analysis there are several assumptions that must be held, so that the property of the best linear unbiased estimator (BLUE) is still guaranteed. In fact, we often found violations of the assumptions.  One of them was violations of the homoscedasticity or occurs heteroscedasticity. The impact of heteroscedasticity in the regression model is that the ordinary least square (OLS) estimator no longer has a minimum variance although still linear and unbiased. To handle this, weighted least square (WLS) regression is used instead, which giving weights on the observations. But the problem often encountered is choosing which the best weight in WLS method. This paper aimed to compare and determine the best weight among 1/X, 1/ , 1/Y and 1/s in multiple regression model. Human development index factors data, which were obtained from the Indonesian Central Bureau of Statistics, were used. The results showed that the best weight on human development index data was 1/s.  The coefficient of determination was 98.7% indicating that the model was very good.
加权最小二乘法处理多元回归模型异方差的权重比较
回归分析是确定两个或多个变量之间因果关系的最流行、最常用的方法。在回归分析中,有几个假设必须成立,这样才能保证最佳线性无偏估计器(BLUE)的特性。事实上,我们经常发现违反这些假设的情况。 其中之一就是违反了同方差或出现了异方差。回归模型中的异方差的影响是,普通最小二乘法(OLS)估计器虽然仍然是线性无偏的,但不再具有最小方差。为了解决这个问题,可以使用加权最小二乘法(WLS)回归,即对观测值进行加权。但经常遇到的问题是如何选择 WLS 方法中的最佳权重。本文旨在比较并确定多元回归模型中 1/X、1/、1/Y 和 1/s 的最佳权重。本文使用了从印度尼西亚中央统计局获得的人类发展指数因子数据。结果显示,人类发展指数数据的最佳权重为 1/s。 确定系数为 98.7%,表明该模型非常好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书