Application of anterior bilateral sacrospinous fixation in the treatment of apical genital prolapse

Q3 Medicine
A. A. Popov, S. A. Gadzhieva
{"title":"Application of anterior bilateral sacrospinous fixation in the treatment of apical genital prolapse","authors":"A. A. Popov, S. A. Gadzhieva","doi":"10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2024.470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: to increase the clinical effectiveness and safety of apical prolapse treatment by applying anterior bilateral sacrospinous fixation (SSF) with a polypropylene mesh implant.Materials and Methods. A single-center open prospective comparative clinical study in parallel groups in parallel groups was carried out at the Clinic of Academician Krasnopolsky Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology. There were examined and treated 155 patients with stage II–IV symptomatic genital prolapse according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q) who underwent various variants of SSF. The patients were stratified into 3 groups: group 1 (LPSSF) – 34 patients with symptomatic apical genital prolapse who underwent SSF through the posterior vaginal wall using LPSSF ligatures (ligature posterior sacrospinous fixation); group 2 (LASSF) – 42 patients with symptomatic apical or anterior-apical genital prolapse, who underwent ligature SSF using the anterior approach LASSF (ligature anterior sacrospinous fixation); group 3 (MESH TASSF) – 79 patients with symptomatic apical or anterior-apical genital prolapse, who were treated by applying the anterior bilateral SSF method using synthetic tape MESH TASSF (tape anterior sacrospinous fixation). The frequency of intra- and postoperative complications, patient complaints, and relapse rates were assessed post-surgery. Functional outcomes were assessed using the PFDI-20 questionnaire (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20) at 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment. Patients in group 3 were treated by applying a method we developed for correction of apical genital prolapse and concomitant cystocele reconstruction.Results. The method presented here was characterized by a lower blood volume loss compared to posterior SSF, minimized intra- and postoperative complications: decreased incidence of hematomas, buttock pain, rate of urinary disorders (stress incontinence, mixed forms of urinary incontinence, urgent urinary incontinence, urinary difficulty, bladder hypotension). Applying MESH TASSF fixation allowed to decrease duration of hospital treatment and alleviate pain severity in the postoperative period, and additionally contributed to improved patients' quality of life sustained for as long as 12 months post-surgery.Conclusion. The treatment results confirmed that the MESH bilateral SSF method using an anterior approach is clinically effective, relatively safe, and contributes to a markedly reduced rate of disease relapses. The presence of anterior-apical or apical genital prolapse (C or Ba+C prolapse, stages II–IV according to the POP-Q) should be considered as indications for performing anterior bilateral SSF.","PeriodicalId":36521,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction","volume":"56 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2024.470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: to increase the clinical effectiveness and safety of apical prolapse treatment by applying anterior bilateral sacrospinous fixation (SSF) with a polypropylene mesh implant.Materials and Methods. A single-center open prospective comparative clinical study in parallel groups in parallel groups was carried out at the Clinic of Academician Krasnopolsky Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology. There were examined and treated 155 patients with stage II–IV symptomatic genital prolapse according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q) who underwent various variants of SSF. The patients were stratified into 3 groups: group 1 (LPSSF) – 34 patients with symptomatic apical genital prolapse who underwent SSF through the posterior vaginal wall using LPSSF ligatures (ligature posterior sacrospinous fixation); group 2 (LASSF) – 42 patients with symptomatic apical or anterior-apical genital prolapse, who underwent ligature SSF using the anterior approach LASSF (ligature anterior sacrospinous fixation); group 3 (MESH TASSF) – 79 patients with symptomatic apical or anterior-apical genital prolapse, who were treated by applying the anterior bilateral SSF method using synthetic tape MESH TASSF (tape anterior sacrospinous fixation). The frequency of intra- and postoperative complications, patient complaints, and relapse rates were assessed post-surgery. Functional outcomes were assessed using the PFDI-20 questionnaire (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20) at 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment. Patients in group 3 were treated by applying a method we developed for correction of apical genital prolapse and concomitant cystocele reconstruction.Results. The method presented here was characterized by a lower blood volume loss compared to posterior SSF, minimized intra- and postoperative complications: decreased incidence of hematomas, buttock pain, rate of urinary disorders (stress incontinence, mixed forms of urinary incontinence, urgent urinary incontinence, urinary difficulty, bladder hypotension). Applying MESH TASSF fixation allowed to decrease duration of hospital treatment and alleviate pain severity in the postoperative period, and additionally contributed to improved patients' quality of life sustained for as long as 12 months post-surgery.Conclusion. The treatment results confirmed that the MESH bilateral SSF method using an anterior approach is clinically effective, relatively safe, and contributes to a markedly reduced rate of disease relapses. The presence of anterior-apical or apical genital prolapse (C or Ba+C prolapse, stages II–IV according to the POP-Q) should be considered as indications for performing anterior bilateral SSF.
双侧骶棘前固定术在治疗顶端生殖器脱垂中的应用
目的:通过应用双侧骶棘前路固定术(SSF)和聚丙烯网片植入物,提高根尖脱垂治疗的临床有效性和安全性。莫斯科克拉斯诺波利斯基院士地区妇产科研究所门诊部开展了一项单中心开放式前瞻性平行分组比较临床研究。根据盆腔器官脱垂定量系统(POP-Q),共有155名II-IV期无症状生殖器脱垂患者接受了各种不同的SSF检查和治疗。患者被分为 3 组:第 1 组(LPSSF)--34 名无症状顶端生殖器脱垂患者,通过阴道后壁使用 LPSSF 结扎法(骶棘肌后部结扎固定术)进行 SSF;第 2 组(LASSF)--42 名无症状顶端或前-顶端生殖器脱垂患者,使用前部方法 LASSF(骶棘肌前部结扎固定术)进行结扎 SSF;第 3 组(MESH TASSF)--79 名有症状的顶端或前-顶端生殖器脱垂患者,使用合成胶带 MESH TASSF(胶带骶棘固定前法)进行双侧骶棘固定前法治疗。手术后对术中、术后并发症发生率、患者投诉和复发率进行了评估。在治疗后3个月、6个月和12个月,使用PFDI-20(盆底压力量表-20)问卷对功能结果进行评估。第 3 组患者采用我们开发的一种方法进行治疗,该方法用于矫正顶端生殖器脱垂并同时进行膀胱重建。与后路 SSF 相比,该方法的特点是出血量更少,术中和术后并发症最少:血肿、臀部疼痛、排尿障碍(压力性尿失禁、混合性尿失禁、急迫性尿失禁、排尿困难、膀胱低血压)的发生率降低。应用 MESH TASSF 固定术缩短了住院治疗时间,减轻了术后疼痛的严重程度,此外还有助于提高患者的生活质量,术后持续时间长达 12 个月。治疗结果证实,采用前路的 MESH 双侧 SSF 方法临床有效、相对安全,并有助于显著降低疾病复发率。生殖器前-顶或顶端脱垂(C 或 Ba+C 脱垂,根据 POP-Q 分期为 II-IV 期)应被视为实施前路双侧 SSF 的适应症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信