Consolation in the aftermath of violent public assaults: An interaction ethological study

L. S. Liebst, R. Philpot, Peter Ejbye-Ernst, W. Bernasco, Marie Bruvik Heinskou, Peter Verbeek, Mark Levine, M. R. Lindegaard
{"title":"Consolation in the aftermath of violent public assaults: An interaction ethological study","authors":"L. S. Liebst, R. Philpot, Peter Ejbye-Ernst, W. Bernasco, Marie Bruvik Heinskou, Peter Verbeek, Mark Levine, M. R. Lindegaard","doi":"10.1556/2055.2023.00018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Animal ethologists suggest that non-human primates console victims of aggression in a manner similar to humans. However, the empirical basis for this cross-species comparison is fragile, given that few studies have examined consolation behavior among humans. To address this gap, we revive and apply the underappreciated ethological branch of micro-sociology, which advocates the study of human interactions by applying ethological observation techniques. We thus systematically observed naturally occurring human consolation captured by video surveillance cameras in the aftermath of violent public assaults. Consistent with prior human and non-human primate research, social affiliation promoted consolatory helping. By contrast, we found no main effect of sex. A further exploratory analysis indicated an interaction effect between social affiliation and sex, with female affiliates having the largest probability of providing consolation. We discuss implications for the cross-species study of primate consolation and advocate that micro-sociology should reappraise ethological perspectives.","PeriodicalId":488583,"journal":{"name":"Culture and Evolution","volume":"17 s1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/2055.2023.00018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Animal ethologists suggest that non-human primates console victims of aggression in a manner similar to humans. However, the empirical basis for this cross-species comparison is fragile, given that few studies have examined consolation behavior among humans. To address this gap, we revive and apply the underappreciated ethological branch of micro-sociology, which advocates the study of human interactions by applying ethological observation techniques. We thus systematically observed naturally occurring human consolation captured by video surveillance cameras in the aftermath of violent public assaults. Consistent with prior human and non-human primate research, social affiliation promoted consolatory helping. By contrast, we found no main effect of sex. A further exploratory analysis indicated an interaction effect between social affiliation and sex, with female affiliates having the largest probability of providing consolation. We discuss implications for the cross-species study of primate consolation and advocate that micro-sociology should reappraise ethological perspectives.
公众暴力袭击后的安慰:互动伦理学研究
动物伦理学家认为,非人类灵长类动物安慰攻击受害者的方式与人类类似。然而,这种跨物种比较的经验基础并不牢固,因为很少有研究考察过人类的安慰行为。为了填补这一空白,我们恢复并应用了未被充分重视的微观社会学这一人种学分支,该分支主张通过应用人种学观察技术来研究人与人之间的互动。因此,我们系统地观察了视频监控摄像头捕捉到的公共场所暴力袭击发生后自然发生的人类安慰行为。与之前的人类和非人灵长类研究一致,社会归属感促进了安慰性帮助。相比之下,我们没有发现性别的主效应。进一步的探索性分析表明,社会从属关系与性别之间存在交互作用,女性从属者提供安慰的概率最大。我们讨论了灵长类动物安慰的跨物种研究的意义,并主张微观社会学应该重新评估伦理学的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信