Guidelines for chronic pain in adult spinal cord injury population: Scoping review

IF 1 Q4 REHABILITATION
Tammy-Lee Williams, Conran Joseph, L. Nilsson-Wikmar, Joliana Phillips
{"title":"Guidelines for chronic pain in adult spinal cord injury population: Scoping review","authors":"Tammy-Lee Williams, Conran Joseph, L. Nilsson-Wikmar, Joliana Phillips","doi":"10.4102/sajp.v80i1.1931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Chronic pain among survivors of spinal cord injury (SCI) hurts physical and mental health. Persons with SCI have demonstrated dissatisfaction with the management of their chronic pain.Objectives: This study aimed to identify existing clinical practice guidelines for chronic pain in the SCI population.Method: A scoping review was conducted across various databases available at the University of the Western Cape, in addition to guideline clearing houses (BioMedCentral, Cambridge Journals Online, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Medline [EbscoHost], Medline [Pubmed], Sabinet Reference, SAGE Journals Online, ScienceDirect, SCOPUS, Wiley Online Library, Springerlink, PubMed, Guideline Central, and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality). The population consisted of adults with SCI, and the interventions that were included were pharmacological and nonpharmacological management of chronic pain. Guidelines that met the inclusion criteria were critically appraised by two reviewers from this study using the AGREE II instrument. Inter-rater reliability was calculated using SPSS 27, and Cohen’s kappa coefficients were established.Results: Five articles were included in the data extraction, analysis and appraisal. Two guidelines were rated as high quality, according to the AGREE II tool. In addition, most guidelines focused on neuropathic pain (NeuP) and only one guideline included nociceptive pain and NeuP.Conclusion: One guideline met the objectives of this scoping review.Clinical implications: Guidelines developed in the future should include a screening tool to identify the specific type of pain and distinguish peripheral NeuP from central NeuP.","PeriodicalId":44180,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v80i1.1931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic pain among survivors of spinal cord injury (SCI) hurts physical and mental health. Persons with SCI have demonstrated dissatisfaction with the management of their chronic pain.Objectives: This study aimed to identify existing clinical practice guidelines for chronic pain in the SCI population.Method: A scoping review was conducted across various databases available at the University of the Western Cape, in addition to guideline clearing houses (BioMedCentral, Cambridge Journals Online, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Medline [EbscoHost], Medline [Pubmed], Sabinet Reference, SAGE Journals Online, ScienceDirect, SCOPUS, Wiley Online Library, Springerlink, PubMed, Guideline Central, and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality). The population consisted of adults with SCI, and the interventions that were included were pharmacological and nonpharmacological management of chronic pain. Guidelines that met the inclusion criteria were critically appraised by two reviewers from this study using the AGREE II instrument. Inter-rater reliability was calculated using SPSS 27, and Cohen’s kappa coefficients were established.Results: Five articles were included in the data extraction, analysis and appraisal. Two guidelines were rated as high quality, according to the AGREE II tool. In addition, most guidelines focused on neuropathic pain (NeuP) and only one guideline included nociceptive pain and NeuP.Conclusion: One guideline met the objectives of this scoping review.Clinical implications: Guidelines developed in the future should include a screening tool to identify the specific type of pain and distinguish peripheral NeuP from central NeuP.
成人脊髓损伤人群慢性疼痛指南:范围界定审查
背景:脊髓损伤(SCI)幸存者的慢性疼痛会损害身心健康。SCI 患者对其慢性疼痛的治疗表示不满:本研究旨在确定现有的脊髓损伤人群慢性疼痛临床实践指南:方法:除了指南交换中心(BioMedCentral、Cambridge Journals Online、CINAHL、Cochrane Library、Medline [EbscoHost]、Medline [Pubmed]、Sabinet Reference、SAGE Journals Online、ScienceDirect、SCOPUS、Wiley Online Library、Springerlink、PubMed、Guideline Central 和 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality)外,还对西开普大学现有的各种数据库进行了范围审查。研究对象包括患有 SCI 的成年人,纳入的干预措施包括慢性疼痛的药物治疗和非药物治疗。符合纳入标准的指南由本研究的两名评审员使用 AGREE II 工具进行严格评审。使用 SPSS 27 计算了评审者之间的可靠性,并确定了科恩卡帕系数:五篇文章被纳入数据提取、分析和评估。根据 AGREE II 工具,两篇指南被评为高质量。此外,大多数指南侧重于神经病理性疼痛(NeuP),只有一份指南包括了痛觉疼痛和神经病理性疼痛:结论:一份指南达到了本次范围界定审查的目标:临床意义:未来制定的指南应包括筛查工具,以确定疼痛的具体类型,并区分外周神经性疼痛和中枢神经性疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信