Online video resources pertaining to cerebral palsy: A YouTube-based quality control study

Nicholas Thomas, Julian Melchor, Rachel Carr, Sarah Ripps, Nicole Pham, R. Golan, Nakul S. Talathi, Rachel M Thompson, David Spence, Hank Chambers
{"title":"Online video resources pertaining to cerebral palsy: A YouTube-based quality control study","authors":"Nicholas Thomas, Julian Melchor, Rachel Carr, Sarah Ripps, Nicole Pham, R. Golan, Nakul S. Talathi, Rachel M Thompson, David Spence, Hank Chambers","doi":"10.1177/18632521241227803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To assess the content and quality of YouTube videos related to cerebral palsy to provide insights into the online video resources available for individuals affected by cerebral palsy and suggest strategies for improvement. YouTube videos were analyzed based on interaction parameters, content characteristics/category, and video source. Video reliability and quality were assessed using the Journal of American Medical Association benchmark, Global Quality Scale, and cerebral palsy-specific score. Statistical analyses examined associations between video characteristics and reliability/quality scores. The average video ( n = 48) length was 6.8 min, with 29 informational and 19 experiential videos. The mean Journal of American Medical Association score was 2.0, indicating moderate reliability. The Global Quality Scale suggested good quality content (average: 3.5), but only 14% were rated as good via cerebral palsy-specific score. Higher views were associated with higher Journal of American Medical Association score and cerebral palsy-specific score ( p = 0.002 and p = 0.006), and nonphysician medical expert videos had lower Journal of American Medical Association scores than academic videos ( p = 0.042). Video content was not significantly associated with either score. YouTube provides moderate to good quality information on cerebral palsy. Critical evaluation of video sources and content is essential. Findings can guide strategies to enhance the quality of cerebral palsy-related YouTube content, benefiting individuals with cerebral palsy, health care providers, and caregivers.","PeriodicalId":138259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Children's Orthopaedics","volume":"350 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Children's Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18632521241227803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To assess the content and quality of YouTube videos related to cerebral palsy to provide insights into the online video resources available for individuals affected by cerebral palsy and suggest strategies for improvement. YouTube videos were analyzed based on interaction parameters, content characteristics/category, and video source. Video reliability and quality were assessed using the Journal of American Medical Association benchmark, Global Quality Scale, and cerebral palsy-specific score. Statistical analyses examined associations between video characteristics and reliability/quality scores. The average video ( n = 48) length was 6.8 min, with 29 informational and 19 experiential videos. The mean Journal of American Medical Association score was 2.0, indicating moderate reliability. The Global Quality Scale suggested good quality content (average: 3.5), but only 14% were rated as good via cerebral palsy-specific score. Higher views were associated with higher Journal of American Medical Association score and cerebral palsy-specific score ( p = 0.002 and p = 0.006), and nonphysician medical expert videos had lower Journal of American Medical Association scores than academic videos ( p = 0.042). Video content was not significantly associated with either score. YouTube provides moderate to good quality information on cerebral palsy. Critical evaluation of video sources and content is essential. Findings can guide strategies to enhance the quality of cerebral palsy-related YouTube content, benefiting individuals with cerebral palsy, health care providers, and caregivers.
有关脑瘫的在线视频资源:基于 YouTube 的质量控制研究
评估与脑瘫相关的 YouTube 视频的内容和质量,以深入了解脑瘫患者可用的在线视频资源,并提出改进策略。根据交互参数、内容特征/类别和视频来源对 YouTube 视频进行了分析。视频的可靠性和质量采用《美国医学会杂志》基准、全球质量量表和脑瘫特定评分进行评估。统计分析研究了视频特征与可靠性/质量得分之间的关联。视频(n = 48)的平均长度为 6.8 分钟,其中 29 个为信息类视频,19 个为体验类视频。美国医学会杂志》的平均评分为 2.0,表明可靠性适中。全球质量量表显示内容质量良好(平均:3.5),但只有 14% 的内容通过脑瘫专项评分被评为良好。观看次数越多,《美国医学会杂志》评分和脑瘫特异性评分越高(p = 0.002 和 p = 0.006),非医师医学专家视频的《美国医学会杂志》评分低于学术视频(p = 0.042)。视频内容与这两项得分均无明显关联。YouTube提供的脑瘫信息质量中等到良好。对视频来源和内容进行严格评估至关重要。研究结果可以指导提高 YouTube 上与脑瘫相关内容质量的策略,从而使脑瘫患者、医疗服务提供者和护理人员受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信