Use of Anal Fistula Plug for Treatment of Fistula-in-ano: A Novel Technique?

IF 0.1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Amit Kumar Shah, R. Shankaran, Akshat Shah
{"title":"Use of Anal Fistula Plug for Treatment of Fistula-in-ano: A Novel Technique?","authors":"Amit Kumar Shah, R. Shankaran, Akshat Shah","doi":"10.4103/jmms.jmms_183_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Fistula-in-ano is a chronic phase of anorectal suppuration characterized by purulent discharge. The conventional gold standard fistulotomy opens the entire track to heal with secondary intention. Anal fistula plug (AFP) is one of the newer modalities where the track is debrided from within and plugged with a biodegradable material made of porcine small intestinal submucosa.\n \n \n \n A total of 100 patients were enrolled in a randomized prospective study into two groups: conventional fistulotomy (CF) group and AFP group with 50 patients in each arm. The demography and surgical outcomes were assessed for postoperative pain, discharge and recovery, and failure.\n \n \n \n All 100 patients included in the study had a history of anorectal suppuration which led to the residual anal fistula. Postoperative pain and analgesic requirements were equal in the two groups. The recovery period and return to work were shorter in the AFP group, and this difference was statistically significant. The success rate was 100% in the CF group as compared to 76% in the AFP group. There was no significant complication, failure, or recurrence in the CF group as against allergy (1), extrusion of plug (2), and failure/recurrence (9) in the AFP group.\n \n \n \n Our study shows that the application of bioprosthetic plugs may be an alternative option in a select group of patients. AFP has also shown to have a faster recovery with less morbidity and comparable success rates.\n","PeriodicalId":41773,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marine Medical Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marine Medical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmms.jmms_183_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fistula-in-ano is a chronic phase of anorectal suppuration characterized by purulent discharge. The conventional gold standard fistulotomy opens the entire track to heal with secondary intention. Anal fistula plug (AFP) is one of the newer modalities where the track is debrided from within and plugged with a biodegradable material made of porcine small intestinal submucosa. A total of 100 patients were enrolled in a randomized prospective study into two groups: conventional fistulotomy (CF) group and AFP group with 50 patients in each arm. The demography and surgical outcomes were assessed for postoperative pain, discharge and recovery, and failure. All 100 patients included in the study had a history of anorectal suppuration which led to the residual anal fistula. Postoperative pain and analgesic requirements were equal in the two groups. The recovery period and return to work were shorter in the AFP group, and this difference was statistically significant. The success rate was 100% in the CF group as compared to 76% in the AFP group. There was no significant complication, failure, or recurrence in the CF group as against allergy (1), extrusion of plug (2), and failure/recurrence (9) in the AFP group. Our study shows that the application of bioprosthetic plugs may be an alternative option in a select group of patients. AFP has also shown to have a faster recovery with less morbidity and comparable success rates.
使用肛瘘塞治疗肛瘘:一项新技术?
肛瘘是以脓性分泌物为特征的慢性肛门直肠化脓期。传统的金标准瘘管切开术会打开整个瘘管,使瘘管继发愈合。肛瘘塞(AFP)是一种较新的方法,即从内部剥离瘘管,用猪小肠粘膜下层制成的可生物降解材料塞住瘘管。 一项随机前瞻性研究共招募了 100 名患者,分为两组:传统瘘管切开术(CF)组和 AFP 组,每组 50 名患者。研究人员根据术后疼痛、出院和恢复情况以及失败情况评估了人口统计学和手术效果。 参与研究的 100 名患者均有肛门直肠化脓史,导致肛瘘残留。两组患者的术后疼痛和镇痛需求相同。AFP组的恢复期和重返工作岗位的时间更短,这一差异在统计学上有显著意义。CF组的成功率为100%,而AFP组为76%。CF 组未出现明显的并发症、失败或复发,而 AFP 组出现过敏(1 例)、塞子挤出(2 例)和失败/复发(9 例)。 我们的研究表明,在特定的患者群体中,应用生物假体塞可能是一种替代选择。此外,AFP术后恢复更快,发病率更低,成功率也相当高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Marine Medical Society
Journal of Marine Medical Society PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信