Shifting Neoliberalism in US Telecommunications Policy: A Critical Reading of Chicago School Roads

Sydney L Forde
{"title":"Shifting Neoliberalism in US Telecommunications Policy: A Critical Reading of Chicago School Roads","authors":"Sydney L Forde","doi":"10.31269/triplec.v22i1.1436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Popular narratives characterising neoliberal economic orthodoxy hold that all forms of government intervention are counter-productive to free markets. Conservatives who claim to embody such liberalism often trace opposition to government interventions to two founding Chicago School economists, Friedrich August von Hayek and Milton Friedman. Through close examinations of the seminal works from Hayek and Friedman, this paper complicates the relationship between the “free-market” neoliberal economic imaginaries derived from both economists’ seminal books as “utopian neoliberalism”, and modern commercial-focused telecommunications policies premised on the active construction of industry serving conditions as “political neoliberalism”. In examining the CONNECT Act aimed at banning the municipal deployment of broadband services in every state across America, this analysis demonstrates significant differences between “utopian” and “political” articulations of neoliberalism, with the latter appearing to ground language and justifications in the former, while simultaneously contradicting baseline principles of such. The seemingly baseless motivations behind the contradictory logics of political neoliberalism are critically assessed and the role of corporate domination of the US telecommunications sector as a guiding philosophy for neoliberal policymakers is discussed.","PeriodicalId":517173,"journal":{"name":"tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society","volume":"362 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v22i1.1436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Popular narratives characterising neoliberal economic orthodoxy hold that all forms of government intervention are counter-productive to free markets. Conservatives who claim to embody such liberalism often trace opposition to government interventions to two founding Chicago School economists, Friedrich August von Hayek and Milton Friedman. Through close examinations of the seminal works from Hayek and Friedman, this paper complicates the relationship between the “free-market” neoliberal economic imaginaries derived from both economists’ seminal books as “utopian neoliberalism”, and modern commercial-focused telecommunications policies premised on the active construction of industry serving conditions as “political neoliberalism”. In examining the CONNECT Act aimed at banning the municipal deployment of broadband services in every state across America, this analysis demonstrates significant differences between “utopian” and “political” articulations of neoliberalism, with the latter appearing to ground language and justifications in the former, while simultaneously contradicting baseline principles of such. The seemingly baseless motivations behind the contradictory logics of political neoliberalism are critically assessed and the role of corporate domination of the US telecommunications sector as a guiding philosophy for neoliberal policymakers is discussed.
美国电信政策中新自由主义的转变:芝加哥学派道路批判性解读
作为新自由主义正统经济学特征的流行说法认为,一切形式的政府干预都会对自由市场产生反作用。声称体现了这种自由主义的保守派往往将反对政府干预的原因追溯到两位芝加哥学派的创始经济学家弗里德里希-奥古斯特-冯-哈耶克和米尔顿-弗里德曼。通过仔细研究哈耶克和弗里德曼的开创性著作,本文将这两位经济学家开创性著作中的 "自由市场 "新自由主义经济想象与以积极构建行业服务条件为前提的 "政治新自由主义 "现代商业电信政策之间的关系复杂化。通过对旨在禁止在全美各州部署市政宽带服务的《连接法案》(CONNECT Act)的研究,本分析展示了新自由主义的 "乌托邦式 "和 "政治式 "表述之间的显著差异,后者似乎将前者的语言和理由作为基础,同时又违背了前者的基本原则。我们对政治新自由主义自相矛盾的逻辑背后看似毫无根据的动机进行了批判性评估,并讨论了美国电信业的企业统治作为新自由主义政策制定者的指导思想所发挥的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信