Mechanical and fracture properties of mortars reinforced with glass fibre and prepared with different cement types

Haruna Ibrahim, George Wardeh, Hanaa Fares, E. Ghorbel
{"title":"Mechanical and fracture properties of mortars reinforced with glass fibre and prepared with different cement types","authors":"Haruna Ibrahim, George Wardeh, Hanaa Fares, E. Ghorbel","doi":"10.1108/ijbpa-12-2023-0197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe main aim of the current study is to investigate the effect of Anti-Crack HP 67/36 glass fibre on the mechanical performance of mortars made of cement, with a focus on post-cracking evaluations using the digital image correlation (DIC) technique.Design/methodology/approachExperimental tests were carried out on 36-mm long fibres at 0.8% by volume and added to the normal strength (NSM), high strength (HSM) and high strength mortar with fly ash (HSMFA) mortars. CEM I 52.5 CP2 NF, CEM II/A-L 42.5 NF and CEM III/C 32.5 N-SR PM were used for each series of mortar to assess the performance of the glass fibres with the types of cement. F-class fly (FA) ash was used to reduce global CO2 emissions.FindingsThe mortar’s strength decreased as the cement types changed from CEM I to CEM II and III. However, due to changes in the portlandite content of the cement, water porosity increased for both types of mortar, without and with fibre. It was also found that using glass fibre increased flexural strength more than compressive strength, regardless of the type of cement used. For all the strength classes, it was found that the mortar mixes with CEM I had the highest critical crack opening (wc) and fracture energy (GF), followed by CEM II and III. No significant effects were observed in the mortar’s property by replacing fly ash (12%).Research limitations/implicationsOnly mortars were formulated in this study, but the results must be verified at the concrete scale.Practical implicationsValidation of the DIC technique to characterize the post-cracking behaviour of cement-based material. Use of glass fibres to improve the material’s resistance to cracking.Social implicationsUse of CEM II and CEM III cements with low CO2 footprint instead of CEMI without altering the mechanical performance of the material.Originality/valueThe work is a further contribution to studying the cracking behaviour of several series of variable mortars depending on the resistance class and the type of cement used.","PeriodicalId":510161,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation","volume":"21 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijbpa-12-2023-0197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe main aim of the current study is to investigate the effect of Anti-Crack HP 67/36 glass fibre on the mechanical performance of mortars made of cement, with a focus on post-cracking evaluations using the digital image correlation (DIC) technique.Design/methodology/approachExperimental tests were carried out on 36-mm long fibres at 0.8% by volume and added to the normal strength (NSM), high strength (HSM) and high strength mortar with fly ash (HSMFA) mortars. CEM I 52.5 CP2 NF, CEM II/A-L 42.5 NF and CEM III/C 32.5 N-SR PM were used for each series of mortar to assess the performance of the glass fibres with the types of cement. F-class fly (FA) ash was used to reduce global CO2 emissions.FindingsThe mortar’s strength decreased as the cement types changed from CEM I to CEM II and III. However, due to changes in the portlandite content of the cement, water porosity increased for both types of mortar, without and with fibre. It was also found that using glass fibre increased flexural strength more than compressive strength, regardless of the type of cement used. For all the strength classes, it was found that the mortar mixes with CEM I had the highest critical crack opening (wc) and fracture energy (GF), followed by CEM II and III. No significant effects were observed in the mortar’s property by replacing fly ash (12%).Research limitations/implicationsOnly mortars were formulated in this study, but the results must be verified at the concrete scale.Practical implicationsValidation of the DIC technique to characterize the post-cracking behaviour of cement-based material. Use of glass fibres to improve the material’s resistance to cracking.Social implicationsUse of CEM II and CEM III cements with low CO2 footprint instead of CEMI without altering the mechanical performance of the material.Originality/valueThe work is a further contribution to studying the cracking behaviour of several series of variable mortars depending on the resistance class and the type of cement used.
用不同类型水泥制备的玻璃纤维增强砂浆的机械性能和断裂性能
本研究的主要目的是研究抗裂 HP 67/36 玻璃纤维对水泥砂浆机械性能的影响,重点是使用数字图像相关(DIC)技术进行开裂后评估。设计/方法/途径对 36 毫米长的纤维(体积分数为 0.8%)进行了实验测试,并将其添加到普通强度砂浆(NSM)、高强度砂浆(HSM)和含粉煤灰的高强度砂浆(HSMFA)中。每个系列的砂浆都使用了 CEM I 52.5 CP2 NF、CEM II/A-L 42.5 NF 和 CEM III/C 32.5 N-SR PM,以评估玻璃纤维与水泥类型的性能。结果随着水泥类型从 CEM I 到 CEM II 和 CEM III 的变化,砂浆的强度降低。然而,由于水泥中硅酸盐含量的变化,两种砂浆(不含纤维和含纤维)的孔隙率都有所增加。研究还发现,无论使用哪种水泥,玻璃纤维对抗弯强度的提高都大于抗压强度。在所有强度等级中,使用 CEM I 的砂浆混合料的临界裂缝开度(wc)和断裂能(GF)最高,其次是 CEM II 和 CEM III。研究的局限性/意义本研究只配制了砂浆,但结果必须在混凝土规模上得到验证。社会影响使用二氧化碳排放量低的 CEM II 和 CEM III 水泥代替 CEMI,同时不改变材料的机械性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信