Substantial innovation or strategic innovation? The impact of government venture capital guidance funds on corporate innovation

Strategic Change Pub Date : 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1002/jsc.2583
F. Saci, Mohamad Ahmad
{"title":"Substantial innovation or strategic innovation? The impact of government venture capital guidance funds on corporate innovation","authors":"F. Saci, Mohamad Ahmad","doi":"10.1002/jsc.2583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on a dual‐differential model of the number of patent applications issued by A‐share enterprises from 2014 to 2019, this article analyzes impact of Venture Capital (VC) guided by government on company's innovation and their internal mechanisms. The results show that the number of patent applications increases after enterprises are invested directly or indirectly by the government guiding fund, indicating that this kind of VC has a positive guidance on enterprise innovation. However, after further studying by subdividing patent types, it is found that enterprises pay less attention to invention patents, which hold higher technical requirements, and focus on “quantity” rather than “quality” in patent applications. This result also reflects that the investment of VC guided by government promotes the overall enterprise innovation, but the positive effect on the innovation quality is not significant. Our article not only affirms the positive influence of VC guided by government on enterprise innovation, but also puts forward some suggestions on the management of government guiding fund.","PeriodicalId":503460,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Change","volume":"28 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on a dual‐differential model of the number of patent applications issued by A‐share enterprises from 2014 to 2019, this article analyzes impact of Venture Capital (VC) guided by government on company's innovation and their internal mechanisms. The results show that the number of patent applications increases after enterprises are invested directly or indirectly by the government guiding fund, indicating that this kind of VC has a positive guidance on enterprise innovation. However, after further studying by subdividing patent types, it is found that enterprises pay less attention to invention patents, which hold higher technical requirements, and focus on “quantity” rather than “quality” in patent applications. This result also reflects that the investment of VC guided by government promotes the overall enterprise innovation, but the positive effect on the innovation quality is not significant. Our article not only affirms the positive influence of VC guided by government on enterprise innovation, but also puts forward some suggestions on the management of government guiding fund.
实质性创新还是战略性创新?政府风险投资引导基金对企业创新的影响
本文基于2014-2019年A股企业专利申请量的双差分模型,分析了政府引导的风险投资(VC)对企业创新的影响及其内部机制。结果表明,企业直接或间接获得政府引导基金投资后,专利申请量增加,说明这种风险投资对企业创新具有积极的引导作用。但是,通过细分专利类型进一步研究发现,企业对技术要求较高的发明专利关注度较低,专利申请重 "量 "轻 "质"。这一结果也反映出,政府引导的风险投资对企业整体创新有促进作用,但对创新质量的正向影响并不显著。本文不仅肯定了政府引导的风险投资对企业创新的积极影响,也对政府引导基金的管理提出了一些建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信