Optimizing the physical activity intervention for older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a factorial randomized trial

Zhanfang Shao, Jundan Huang, Hui Feng, Mingyue Hu
{"title":"Optimizing the physical activity intervention for older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a factorial randomized trial","authors":"Zhanfang Shao, Jundan Huang, Hui Feng, Mingyue Hu","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2024.1383325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Physical activity (PA) intervention is one of the most effective interventions to promote cognitive function of older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, the level of PA remains low. Based on the two core interventions (X-CircuiT and health education), this study aimed to examine the effect of three implementation strategies (viz., role modeling, goal-setting, and reminding) on the PA level among older adults with MCI using the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST).Participants were randomized into one of eight conditions in a factorial design involving three factors with two levels: (i) role modeling (on vs. off); (ii) goal-setting (on vs. off); and (iii) reminding (on vs. off). The primary outcome was PA level at 12 weeks. The secondary outcomes were cognitive function, self-efficacy, and cost-effectiveness at 12 weeks. The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was performed as the main analysis and the per-protocol (PP) analysis as the sensitivity analysis.A total of 107 participants were included and randomly assigned into three groups, each receiving different implementation strategies. The results of the multivariate regression analysis showed that the three implementation strategies, namely, reminding (B = 0.31, p < 0.01), role modeling (B = 0.21, p < 0.01), and goal-setting (B = 0.19, p < 0.01), could significantly improve PA level. Specifically, it was found that role modeling (B = 0.68, p = 0.03) could significantly improve cognitive function. There were no significant interactions among the three implementation strategies. Role modeling was the most cost-effective strategy, costing 93.41 RMB for one unit of PA.Role modeling was likely to be the best implementation strategy. The value-based and cost-effective PA intervention package could include the core intervention (X-CircuiT and health education) and implementation strategy (role modeling).https://www.chictr.org.cn, The study was retrospectively registered on 30 June 2022 (ChiCTR2200061693).","PeriodicalId":509602,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1383325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Physical activity (PA) intervention is one of the most effective interventions to promote cognitive function of older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, the level of PA remains low. Based on the two core interventions (X-CircuiT and health education), this study aimed to examine the effect of three implementation strategies (viz., role modeling, goal-setting, and reminding) on the PA level among older adults with MCI using the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST).Participants were randomized into one of eight conditions in a factorial design involving three factors with two levels: (i) role modeling (on vs. off); (ii) goal-setting (on vs. off); and (iii) reminding (on vs. off). The primary outcome was PA level at 12 weeks. The secondary outcomes were cognitive function, self-efficacy, and cost-effectiveness at 12 weeks. The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was performed as the main analysis and the per-protocol (PP) analysis as the sensitivity analysis.A total of 107 participants were included and randomly assigned into three groups, each receiving different implementation strategies. The results of the multivariate regression analysis showed that the three implementation strategies, namely, reminding (B = 0.31, p < 0.01), role modeling (B = 0.21, p < 0.01), and goal-setting (B = 0.19, p < 0.01), could significantly improve PA level. Specifically, it was found that role modeling (B = 0.68, p = 0.03) could significantly improve cognitive function. There were no significant interactions among the three implementation strategies. Role modeling was the most cost-effective strategy, costing 93.41 RMB for one unit of PA.Role modeling was likely to be the best implementation strategy. The value-based and cost-effective PA intervention package could include the core intervention (X-CircuiT and health education) and implementation strategy (role modeling).https://www.chictr.org.cn, The study was retrospectively registered on 30 June 2022 (ChiCTR2200061693).
优化对患有轻度认知障碍的老年人的体育锻炼干预:因子随机试验
体育锻炼(PA)干预是促进患有轻度认知障碍(MCI)的老年人认知功能的最有效干预措施之一。然而,老年人的体育锻炼水平仍然很低。在两个核心干预措施(X-CircuiT 和健康教育)的基础上,本研究采用多阶段优化策略(MOST),旨在考察三种实施策略(即角色塑造、目标设定和提醒)对 MCI 老年人体育锻炼水平的影响。参与者被随机分配到八个条件中的一个,采用因子设计,涉及两个水平的三个因素:(i) 角色塑造(开与不开);(ii) 目标设定(开与不开);(iii) 提醒(开与不开)。主要结果是 12 周时的 PA 水平。次要结果是 12 周时的认知功能、自我效能和成本效益。主要分析采用意向性治疗(ITT)分析,敏感性分析采用每方案(PP)分析。共纳入 107 名参与者,随机分配到三组,每组接受不同的实施策略。多元回归分析结果表明,提醒(B=0.31,P<0.01)、角色示范(B=0.21,P<0.01)和目标设定(B=0.19,P<0.01)这三种实施策略都能显著提高参与者的PA水平。具体而言,研究发现,榜样作用(B = 0.68,p = 0.03)可明显改善认知功能。三种实施策略之间没有明显的交互作用。角色示范是最具成本效益的策略,一个单位的 PA 成本为 93.41 元人民币。基于价值和成本效益的PA干预包可包括核心干预(X-CircuiT和健康教育)和实施策略(角色模拟)。https://www.chictr.org.cn,该研究于2022年6月30日进行了回顾性注册(ChiCTR2200061693)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信