Legal Reconstruction of Electronic Storage for Notarial Deeds Minute Based on the Value of Justice

Lydia Amelia, G. Gunarto, Anis Mashdurohatun.
{"title":"Legal Reconstruction of Electronic Storage for Notarial Deeds Minute Based on the Value of Justice","authors":"Lydia Amelia, G. Gunarto, Anis Mashdurohatun.","doi":"10.36348/sijlcj.2024.v07i05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objectives of this research are to analyze and find weaknesses in the current regulations for storing notarial deed minutes and to find a reconstruction of regulations on the legality of electronically storing minutes of notarial deeds based on the value of justice in a constructivism paradigm with a social legal research approach method to solve research problems by examining secondary data and primary data by finding legal realities experienced in the field as well as qualitative descriptive methods, namely where The data obtained is then arranged systematically so that a comprehensive picture will be obtained, where later the data will be presented descriptively. Research results show that the Weaknesses consist of (a) Legal structure where there are no communication and informatics experts which means electronic storage of certificate minutes cannot be implemented (b) Legal substance including unclear norms in UUJN Article 15 paragraph (3) UUJN, Unclear norms in UUJN no. 2 of 2014 Article 1 number 13. Weaknesses in proving Article 1868 of the Civil Code. (c) Legal Culture, namely the difficulty for senior notaries to understand new technology and tend to stick with old technology. Therefore, the reconstruction of Pancasila values in the electronic storage of deed minutes creates an electronic notary system because it can create a product that is more accurate, relevant, economical, trustworthy, faster, and more practical. Reconstruction of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary Article 1 number 7 so that the Minutes of Deed are the original Deed containing the signatures of the presenters, witnesses, and Notary, which are stored in paper form and/or in the form of an electronic document as part of the Notary Protocol. Article 16 paragraph (1) letter b becomes (1) In carrying out his office, a Notary is obliged to: b. make deeds in the form of deed minutes and/or deed e-minutes and save them as part of the Notary's protocol.","PeriodicalId":499336,"journal":{"name":"Scholars international journal of law, crime and justice","volume":"21 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scholars international journal of law, crime and justice","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36348/sijlcj.2024.v07i05.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objectives of this research are to analyze and find weaknesses in the current regulations for storing notarial deed minutes and to find a reconstruction of regulations on the legality of electronically storing minutes of notarial deeds based on the value of justice in a constructivism paradigm with a social legal research approach method to solve research problems by examining secondary data and primary data by finding legal realities experienced in the field as well as qualitative descriptive methods, namely where The data obtained is then arranged systematically so that a comprehensive picture will be obtained, where later the data will be presented descriptively. Research results show that the Weaknesses consist of (a) Legal structure where there are no communication and informatics experts which means electronic storage of certificate minutes cannot be implemented (b) Legal substance including unclear norms in UUJN Article 15 paragraph (3) UUJN, Unclear norms in UUJN no. 2 of 2014 Article 1 number 13. Weaknesses in proving Article 1868 of the Civil Code. (c) Legal Culture, namely the difficulty for senior notaries to understand new technology and tend to stick with old technology. Therefore, the reconstruction of Pancasila values in the electronic storage of deed minutes creates an electronic notary system because it can create a product that is more accurate, relevant, economical, trustworthy, faster, and more practical. Reconstruction of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary Article 1 number 7 so that the Minutes of Deed are the original Deed containing the signatures of the presenters, witnesses, and Notary, which are stored in paper form and/or in the form of an electronic document as part of the Notary Protocol. Article 16 paragraph (1) letter b becomes (1) In carrying out his office, a Notary is obliged to: b. make deeds in the form of deed minutes and/or deed e-minutes and save them as part of the Notary's protocol.
基于正义价值的公证契约电子存储分钟的法律重构
本研究的目的是分析和发现现行公证契约会议记录存储法规的不足之处,并根据建构主义范式的 正义价值,以社会法律研究方法重建公证契约会议记录电子存储的合法性法规,以解决研究问 题,具体方法是审查二级数据和一级数据,寻找该领域的法律现实以及定性描述方法,即对所获 得的数据进行系统整理,以便获得全面的信息,随后对数据进行描述性介绍。研究结果表明,薄弱环节包括:(a)法律结构,没有通信和信息学专家,这意味着无法实现证书会议记录的电子存储;(b)法律实质,包括 UUJN 第 15 条第(3)款 UUJN 中不明确的规范、UUJN 第 2 号(2014 年)第 1 条第 13 款中不明确的规范、UUJN 第 15 条第(3)款 UUJN 中不明确的规范、UUJN 第 2 号(2014 年)第 1 条第 13 款中不明确的规范。民法典》第 1868 条的证据不足。(c) 法律文化,即资深公证人难以理解新技术,倾向于固守旧技术。因此,潘查希拉(Pancasila)价值观在契约记录电子存储中的重构创造了一个电子公证系统,因为它可以创造一个更准确、更相关、更经济、更可信、更快捷、更实用的产品。2014 年第 2 号法律关于 2004 年第 30 号法律《公证人地位法》修正案的重构 第 1 条第 7 款规定,契约记录是包含陈述人、证人和公证人签名的原始契约,以纸质和/或电子文件的形式存储,作为公证协议的一部分。第 16 条第(1)款 b 项变为 (1) 公证人在履行其职责时,有义务: b. 以契约记录和/或契约电子记录的形式制作契约,并将其作为公证协议的一部分保存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信