University absorptive capacity: Normative and perceived assessments

Svetlana Orekhova, O. Nikitina, Natalya Yaroshevich
{"title":"University absorptive capacity: Normative and perceived assessments","authors":"Svetlana Orekhova, O. Nikitina, Natalya Yaroshevich","doi":"10.29141/2218-5003-2024-15-2-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowledge management in universities is a dual process combining continuous learning and development of academic staff with the simultaneous transfer of knowledge to students. Collective capabilities and motivation of university employees to absorb and effectively apply knowledge underlie the so-called university absorptive capacity. However, characteristics perceived by workers and the level of absorptive capacity may contrast with the assessments based on university performance standards. The paper proposes and tests a dual method for judging on university absorptive capacity based on normative and perceived assessments. Methodologically, the study rests on knowledge management, the fundamental theoretical framework that covers the concept of absorptive capacity of an organization. Among the research methods are comparative analysis of university performance indicators and economic statistics. Empirical evidence includes data from the survey of 187 academic staff members of Ural Federal University (Ekaterinburg, Russia) and the Monitoring of Efficiency of Higher Educational Institutions in the RF in 2022–2023. Having performed content analysis, we identified the following evaluation parameters: the current level of employees’ knowledge and the potential for knowledge absorption in the organization. The first part of the methodology presents an algorithm for comparing the growth rates of normative performance indicators of the university in question with those of analogous universities. The second part deals with assessing absorptive capacity based on academic staff’s perceptions. The testing results indicate that there is a discrepancy between the normative and perceived assessments, which allowed us to propose a set of measures for adjusting the HR management model in a university.","PeriodicalId":517949,"journal":{"name":"Upravlenets","volume":"26 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Upravlenets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2024-15-2-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Knowledge management in universities is a dual process combining continuous learning and development of academic staff with the simultaneous transfer of knowledge to students. Collective capabilities and motivation of university employees to absorb and effectively apply knowledge underlie the so-called university absorptive capacity. However, characteristics perceived by workers and the level of absorptive capacity may contrast with the assessments based on university performance standards. The paper proposes and tests a dual method for judging on university absorptive capacity based on normative and perceived assessments. Methodologically, the study rests on knowledge management, the fundamental theoretical framework that covers the concept of absorptive capacity of an organization. Among the research methods are comparative analysis of university performance indicators and economic statistics. Empirical evidence includes data from the survey of 187 academic staff members of Ural Federal University (Ekaterinburg, Russia) and the Monitoring of Efficiency of Higher Educational Institutions in the RF in 2022–2023. Having performed content analysis, we identified the following evaluation parameters: the current level of employees’ knowledge and the potential for knowledge absorption in the organization. The first part of the methodology presents an algorithm for comparing the growth rates of normative performance indicators of the university in question with those of analogous universities. The second part deals with assessing absorptive capacity based on academic staff’s perceptions. The testing results indicate that there is a discrepancy between the normative and perceived assessments, which allowed us to propose a set of measures for adjusting the HR management model in a university.
大学的吸收能力:规范评估和感知评估
大学的知识管理是一个双重过程,既包括教职员工的不断学习和发展,也包括同时向学生传授知识。大学员工吸收和有效应用知识的集体能力和动机是所谓大学吸收能力的基础。然而,员工感知到的特征和吸收能力水平可能会与基于大学绩效标准的评估形成反差。本文提出并检验了一种基于规范评估和感知评估的双重方法来判断大学吸收能力。在研究方法上,本研究以知识管理为基础,知识管理是涵盖组织吸收能力概念的基本理论框架。研究方法包括对大学绩效指标和经济统计数据进行比较分析。经验证据包括对乌拉尔联邦大学(俄罗斯叶卡捷琳堡)187 名教职员工的调查数据和 2022-2023 年俄罗斯联邦高等教育机构效率监测数据。通过内容分析,我们确定了以下评估参数:员工当前的知识水平和组织吸收知识的潜力。方法论的第一部分提出了一种算法,用于比较有关大学与类似大学的标准绩效指标增长率。第二部分是根据学术人员的看法评估吸收能力。测试结果表明,标准评估与感知评估之间存在差异,这使我们能够提出一套调整大学人力资源管理模式的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信