To Assess Knowledge and Practice among Nurses Regarding Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection

Ruah Sohail, Humaira Saddique, Rubina Jabeen
{"title":"To Assess Knowledge and Practice among Nurses Regarding Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection","authors":"Ruah Sohail, Humaira Saddique, Rubina Jabeen","doi":"10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are a common healthcare-associated infection among patients with indwelling urinary catheters. The role of nursing staff is crucial in preventing these infections through proper knowledge and practices.\nObjective:To assess the knowledge and practices among nurses regarding the prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections in a tertiary hospital in Lahore, Pakistan.\nMethods:This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 164 nurses from various departments, including medical, surgical, and gynecological units. Nurses with more than one year of experience were included, while student nurses and head nurses not directly involved in patient care were excluded. Data were collected through a survey assessing knowledge and practices related to CAUTIs. The sample size was determined using Solvin's formula. Ethical approval was obtained, and participants gave informed consent. The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 25.0 for descriptive statistics, including frequencies and percentages.\nResults:The majority of participants were female (85.4%), and most were aged between 31 and 35 years (50%). About 51.2% of the nurses had 6 to 10 years of experience, and 46.2% had received prior information or training on catheter-related urinary tract infections. The majority of participants (92.8%) knew that CAUTIs result from prolonged catheter use, and 95.7% were aware that aseptic technique with sterile equipment is crucial for catheter insertion. However, only 67.4% used a sterile technique for insertion, and 79.3% did not perform daily catheter care. The overall knowledge level was low for 29.3% of participants, moderate for 43.5%, and high for 16.3%, while the practice level was poor for 52.2% and good for 37%.\nConclusion:Nurses demonstrated moderate knowledge but poor practices in preventing catheter-related urinary tract infections, indicating the need for targeted interventions and educational programs to bridge the gap and enhance patient care.","PeriodicalId":507812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are a common healthcare-associated infection among patients with indwelling urinary catheters. The role of nursing staff is crucial in preventing these infections through proper knowledge and practices. Objective:To assess the knowledge and practices among nurses regarding the prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections in a tertiary hospital in Lahore, Pakistan. Methods:This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 164 nurses from various departments, including medical, surgical, and gynecological units. Nurses with more than one year of experience were included, while student nurses and head nurses not directly involved in patient care were excluded. Data were collected through a survey assessing knowledge and practices related to CAUTIs. The sample size was determined using Solvin's formula. Ethical approval was obtained, and participants gave informed consent. The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 25.0 for descriptive statistics, including frequencies and percentages. Results:The majority of participants were female (85.4%), and most were aged between 31 and 35 years (50%). About 51.2% of the nurses had 6 to 10 years of experience, and 46.2% had received prior information or training on catheter-related urinary tract infections. The majority of participants (92.8%) knew that CAUTIs result from prolonged catheter use, and 95.7% were aware that aseptic technique with sterile equipment is crucial for catheter insertion. However, only 67.4% used a sterile technique for insertion, and 79.3% did not perform daily catheter care. The overall knowledge level was low for 29.3% of participants, moderate for 43.5%, and high for 16.3%, while the practice level was poor for 52.2% and good for 37%. Conclusion:Nurses demonstrated moderate knowledge but poor practices in preventing catheter-related urinary tract infections, indicating the need for targeted interventions and educational programs to bridge the gap and enhance patient care.
评估护士在预防导尿管相关尿路感染方面的知识和做法
背景:导尿管相关性尿路感染(CAUTI)是留置导尿管患者中常见的医疗相关性感染。目的:评估巴基斯坦拉合尔一家三级医院的护士对预防导尿管相关性尿路感染的知识和实践。方法:这项描述性横断面研究的对象是来自内科、外科和妇科等不同科室的 164 名护士。研究对象包括有一年以上工作经验的护士,但不包括学生护士和不直接参与病人护理的护士长。数据是通过一项调查收集的,该调查评估了与 CAUTIs 相关的知识和实践。样本量采用索尔文公式确定。调查获得了伦理方面的批准,参与者也在知情的情况下表示同意。数据使用 IBM SPSS 统计 25.0 版进行描述性统计分析,包括频率和百分比。约 51.2% 的护士有 6 至 10 年的工作经验,46.2% 的护士曾接受过导尿管相关尿路感染方面的信息或培训。大多数参与者(92.8%)知道长期使用导尿管会导致 CAUTI,95.7% 的参与者知道使用无菌设备的无菌技术对插入导尿管至关重要。然而,只有 67.4% 的人在插入导管时使用了无菌技术,79.3% 的人没有进行日常导管护理。29.3%的参与者总体知识水平较低,43.5%的参与者总体知识水平中等,16.3%的参与者总体知识水平较高,而52.2%的参与者实践水平较差,37%的参与者实践水平较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信