A Numerical Study on the Influence of Riparian Vegetation Patch on the Transportation of Suspended Sediment in a U-Bend Channel Flow

IF 1.8 Q3 MECHANICS
Fluids Pub Date : 2024-05-07 DOI:10.3390/fluids9050109
Mingyang Wang, Qian Yu, Yuan Xu, Na Li, Jing Wang, Bo Cao, Lu Wang, Eldad J. Avital
{"title":"A Numerical Study on the Influence of Riparian Vegetation Patch on the Transportation of Suspended Sediment in a U-Bend Channel Flow","authors":"Mingyang Wang, Qian Yu, Yuan Xu, Na Li, Jing Wang, Bo Cao, Lu Wang, Eldad J. Avital","doi":"10.3390/fluids9050109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bend sections are ubiquitous in natural sandy river systems. This study employs Computational Fluid Dynamics–Discrete Phase Model (CFD-DPM) methodology to analyze particle transport dynamics in U-bend channel flows, focusing on the distinctions between partially vegetated (Case No.1) and non-vegetated (Case No.2) scenarios. The research aims to unravel the intricate relationships among bending channel-induced secondary flow, vegetation blockage, and particle aggregation, employing both quantitative and qualitative approaches. (I) The key findings reveal that vegetation near the inner walls of curved channels markedly diminishes the intensity of secondary circulation. This reduction in circulation intensity is observed not only within vegetated areas but also extends to adjacent non-vegetated zones. Additionally, the study identifies a close correlation between vertical vortices and particle distribution near the channel bed. While particle distribution generally aligns with the vortices’ margin, dynamic patch-scale eddies near vegetation patches induce deviations, creating wave-like patterns in particle distribution. (II) The application of the Probability Density Function (PDF) provides insights into the radius-wise particle distribution. In non-vegetated channels, particle distribution is primarily influenced by secondary flow and boundary layers. In contrast, the presence of vegetation leads to a complex mixing layer, altering the particle distribution pattern and maximizing PDF values in non-vegetated free flow subzones. (III) Furthermore, the research quantifies spatial–temporal sediment heterogeneity through PDF variance. The findings demonstrate that variance in non-vegetated channels increases towards the outer wall in bending regions. Vegetation-induced turbulence causes higher variance, particularly in the mixing layer subzone, underscoring the significance of eddy size in sediment redistribution. (IV) The study of vertical concentration profiles in vegetated U-bend channels offers additional insights, while secondary flow in non-vegetated channels facilitates upward sediment transport and vegetation presence, although increasing the Turbulent Kinetic Energy (TKE), restricts channel space, and impedes secondary flow, thereby reducing vertical particle suspension. Sediment concentrations are found to be higher in the lower layers of vegetated bends, contrary to the pattern in non-vegetated bends. These findings highlight the complex interplay between vegetation, secondary flow, and sediment transport, illustrating the reduced effectiveness of secondary flow in promoting vertical particle transportation in bending channels due to the vegetation obstruction.","PeriodicalId":12397,"journal":{"name":"Fluids","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids9050109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bend sections are ubiquitous in natural sandy river systems. This study employs Computational Fluid Dynamics–Discrete Phase Model (CFD-DPM) methodology to analyze particle transport dynamics in U-bend channel flows, focusing on the distinctions between partially vegetated (Case No.1) and non-vegetated (Case No.2) scenarios. The research aims to unravel the intricate relationships among bending channel-induced secondary flow, vegetation blockage, and particle aggregation, employing both quantitative and qualitative approaches. (I) The key findings reveal that vegetation near the inner walls of curved channels markedly diminishes the intensity of secondary circulation. This reduction in circulation intensity is observed not only within vegetated areas but also extends to adjacent non-vegetated zones. Additionally, the study identifies a close correlation between vertical vortices and particle distribution near the channel bed. While particle distribution generally aligns with the vortices’ margin, dynamic patch-scale eddies near vegetation patches induce deviations, creating wave-like patterns in particle distribution. (II) The application of the Probability Density Function (PDF) provides insights into the radius-wise particle distribution. In non-vegetated channels, particle distribution is primarily influenced by secondary flow and boundary layers. In contrast, the presence of vegetation leads to a complex mixing layer, altering the particle distribution pattern and maximizing PDF values in non-vegetated free flow subzones. (III) Furthermore, the research quantifies spatial–temporal sediment heterogeneity through PDF variance. The findings demonstrate that variance in non-vegetated channels increases towards the outer wall in bending regions. Vegetation-induced turbulence causes higher variance, particularly in the mixing layer subzone, underscoring the significance of eddy size in sediment redistribution. (IV) The study of vertical concentration profiles in vegetated U-bend channels offers additional insights, while secondary flow in non-vegetated channels facilitates upward sediment transport and vegetation presence, although increasing the Turbulent Kinetic Energy (TKE), restricts channel space, and impedes secondary flow, thereby reducing vertical particle suspension. Sediment concentrations are found to be higher in the lower layers of vegetated bends, contrary to the pattern in non-vegetated bends. These findings highlight the complex interplay between vegetation, secondary flow, and sediment transport, illustrating the reduced effectiveness of secondary flow in promoting vertical particle transportation in bending channels due to the vegetation obstruction.
河岸植被斑块对 U 型弯道水流中悬浮固体迁移影响的数值研究
弯曲河段在天然沙质河流系统中无处不在。本研究采用计算流体力学-离散相位模型(CFD-DPM)方法分析 U 形弯曲河道水流中的颗粒输运动力学,重点关注部分植被(情况 1)和无植被(情况 2)两种情况的区别。研究采用定量和定性的方法,旨在揭示弯曲河道引起的二次流、植被阻挡和颗粒聚集之间错综复杂的关系。(一)主要研究结果表明,弯曲水道内壁附近的植被明显减弱了二次环流的强度。这种循环强度的降低不仅出现在植被覆盖区域,而且还延伸到邻近的无植被区域。此外,研究还发现垂直涡流与河床附近的颗粒分布之间存在密切联系。虽然颗粒分布一般与涡旋边缘一致,但植被斑块附近的动态斑块尺度漩涡会引起偏差,在颗粒分布中形成波浪状模式。(II) 概率密度函数(PDF)的应用有助于深入了解颗粒的半径分布。在无植被河道中,颗粒分布主要受次级流和边界层的影响。相反,植被的存在会导致复杂的混合层,改变颗粒分布模式,并使无植被自由流子区的 PDF 值最大化。(三)此外,研究还通过 PDF 差异量化了沉积物的时空异质性。研究结果表明,在弯曲区域,无植被渠道中的方差向外壁增加。植被引起的湍流导致更高的方差,特别是在混合层子区,这突出了涡流大小在沉积物再分布中的重要性。(IV) 对有植被 U 形弯曲河道垂直浓度剖面的研究提供了更多的见解,无植被河道中的次级流有利于泥沙向上输送,而植被的存在虽然增加了湍流动能(TKE),但限制了河道空间,阻碍了次级流,从而减少了颗粒的垂直悬浮。与无植被弯道的模式相反,有植被弯道下层的沉积物浓度较高。这些发现凸显了植被、次级流和泥沙输运之间复杂的相互作用,说明由于植被的阻碍,次级流在弯曲水道中促进垂直颗粒输运的效果降低了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fluids
Fluids Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
326
审稿时长
12 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信