Interventions at the Local Spheres of Government in South Africa: An Assessment of Monitoring and Evaluation

Politeia Pub Date : 2024-05-07 DOI:10.25159/2663-6689/15182
D. Mlambo, M. H. Maserumule
{"title":"Interventions at the Local Spheres of Government in South Africa: An Assessment of Monitoring and Evaluation","authors":"D. Mlambo, M. H. Maserumule","doi":"10.25159/2663-6689/15182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The post-1994 landscape in South Africa presented millions of individuals—especially the majority Black population who had been subjected to many apartheid policies—with renewed hope for better and improved development opportunities. This stemmed from the fact that the first democratically elected administration of the African National Congress (ANC) promised immense socioeconomic change when they assumed office. These promises became evident from the many socioeconomic policies and Chapter 9 institutions that came to the fore over the last two decades, as well as the mapping of new legislation and policies for local government as enshrined in the Constitution of 1996. These actions were viewed to further the envisioned development trajectories of government, especially as the local government is the government closest to the people. However, post-1994, some municipalities in South Africa have endured massive challenges that have needed numerous involvements from the government through various interventions. This has been a continuous phenomenon, irrespective of the many policies at play to oversee the smooth operation of municipalities. This article delves into the failure of some municipalities in South Africa and interventions of local government in post-apartheid South Africa by scrutinising what drives this phenomenon. Furthermore, it dwells on the impact and challenges of effective monitoring and evaluation (M&E) policies at the local government level.","PeriodicalId":32317,"journal":{"name":"Politeia","volume":"17 s24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politeia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-6689/15182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The post-1994 landscape in South Africa presented millions of individuals—especially the majority Black population who had been subjected to many apartheid policies—with renewed hope for better and improved development opportunities. This stemmed from the fact that the first democratically elected administration of the African National Congress (ANC) promised immense socioeconomic change when they assumed office. These promises became evident from the many socioeconomic policies and Chapter 9 institutions that came to the fore over the last two decades, as well as the mapping of new legislation and policies for local government as enshrined in the Constitution of 1996. These actions were viewed to further the envisioned development trajectories of government, especially as the local government is the government closest to the people. However, post-1994, some municipalities in South Africa have endured massive challenges that have needed numerous involvements from the government through various interventions. This has been a continuous phenomenon, irrespective of the many policies at play to oversee the smooth operation of municipalities. This article delves into the failure of some municipalities in South Africa and interventions of local government in post-apartheid South Africa by scrutinising what drives this phenomenon. Furthermore, it dwells on the impact and challenges of effective monitoring and evaluation (M&E) policies at the local government level.
南非地方政府的干预措施:监测与评估
1994 年后的南非,数百万人,特别是曾遭受种族隔离政策之害的大多数黑人,重新燃起了对改善发展机会的希望。这源于非洲人国民大会(ANC)第一届民选政府在就职时承诺要实现巨大的社会经济变革。在过去二十年中,许多社会经济政策和第 9 章机构以及 1996 年《宪法》中规定的地方政府新立法和新政策的制定都体现了这些承诺。这些行动被认为是为了推进政府的预期发展轨迹,特别是因为地方政府是最贴近人民的政府。然而,在 1994 年之后,南非的一些城市经受了巨大的挑战,需要政府通过各种干预措施进行多次介入。这种现象一直存在,尽管有许多政策在发挥作用,以监督市政当局的顺利运作。本文通过研究这一现象的驱动因素,深入探讨了南非一些市政当局的失败以及种族隔离后南非地方政府的干预措施。此外,文章还探讨了有效的监督与评估 (M&E) 政策在地方政府层面的影响和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信