Can you credit it? Towards a process for ascribing credit to apprenticeships in England

D. Bravenboer, Mandy Crawford-Lee, Clare Dunn
{"title":"Can you credit it? Towards a process for ascribing credit to apprenticeships in England","authors":"D. Bravenboer, Mandy Crawford-Lee, Clare Dunn","doi":"10.1108/heswbl-09-2023-0255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeApprenticeships in England, while defined by level and typical duration, are not quantified regarding the number of learning hours required to achieve the outcomes specified, as with other regulated qualifications and accredited programmes. This paper proposes an approach to ascribe credit to apprenticeships recognising both on-and-off-the-job learning to remove some of the existing barriers to accessing higher education (HE) and the professions.Design/methodology/approachA mixed methodological approach resulting in a total learning hours/credit value was proposed.FindingsThere is significant HE-wide confusion regarding the amount of learning/training that is required to complete apprenticeships in England. Whilst sector guidance made it clear that there was no prescribed method to ascribe credit to qualifications, programmes, modules, units or apprenticeships by drawing out the core principles within current practice, a key outcome of this project was the development of a method to ascribe a credit value to apprenticeships.Research limitations/implicationsThere is potential to support further research into the recognition of prior learning as a specialised pedagogy and for reflecting on apprenticeship practice in other roles and sectors.Practical implicationsWhilst the project underpinning this paper focused on the healthcare sector, the method used to ascribe credit to the level-3 healthcare support worker apprenticeship was not sector specific and can therefore be applied to apprenticeships within other contexts providing more widespread benefits to workforce development.Social implicationsPolicy makers must ensure that employers and providers are clear that the minimum statutory off-the-job hours constitute an apprentice employment entitlement, which must not be conflated with total apprenticeship learning hours requirements. This recommended policy clarification could assist in simplifying the process required for ascribing credit to apprenticeships and at the same time support a move towards better and more consistent recognition of the value of apprenticeship learning.Originality/valueIt is a first attempt to ascribe a credit value to an apprenticeship in England for the specific purpose of facilitating progression to HE.","PeriodicalId":502760,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning","volume":"40 S187","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/heswbl-09-2023-0255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeApprenticeships in England, while defined by level and typical duration, are not quantified regarding the number of learning hours required to achieve the outcomes specified, as with other regulated qualifications and accredited programmes. This paper proposes an approach to ascribe credit to apprenticeships recognising both on-and-off-the-job learning to remove some of the existing barriers to accessing higher education (HE) and the professions.Design/methodology/approachA mixed methodological approach resulting in a total learning hours/credit value was proposed.FindingsThere is significant HE-wide confusion regarding the amount of learning/training that is required to complete apprenticeships in England. Whilst sector guidance made it clear that there was no prescribed method to ascribe credit to qualifications, programmes, modules, units or apprenticeships by drawing out the core principles within current practice, a key outcome of this project was the development of a method to ascribe a credit value to apprenticeships.Research limitations/implicationsThere is potential to support further research into the recognition of prior learning as a specialised pedagogy and for reflecting on apprenticeship practice in other roles and sectors.Practical implicationsWhilst the project underpinning this paper focused on the healthcare sector, the method used to ascribe credit to the level-3 healthcare support worker apprenticeship was not sector specific and can therefore be applied to apprenticeships within other contexts providing more widespread benefits to workforce development.Social implicationsPolicy makers must ensure that employers and providers are clear that the minimum statutory off-the-job hours constitute an apprentice employment entitlement, which must not be conflated with total apprenticeship learning hours requirements. This recommended policy clarification could assist in simplifying the process required for ascribing credit to apprenticeships and at the same time support a move towards better and more consistent recognition of the value of apprenticeship learning.Originality/valueIt is a first attempt to ascribe a credit value to an apprenticeship in England for the specific purpose of facilitating progression to HE.
你能记入学分吗?在英格兰建立学徒制学分认定程序
目的 英格兰的学徒制虽然是根据水平和典型持续时间来定义的,但与其他受监管的资格证书和经认可的课程一样,并没有量化实现规定成果所需的学习时数。本文提出了一种学徒制学分认定方法,既承认在职学习,也承认脱产学习,以消除进入高等教育(HE)和专业的一些现有障碍。研究局限/影响研究局限/影响研究局限/影响研究局限/影响有可能支持将先前学习的认可作为一种专门的教学法进行进一步研究,并对其他角色和部门的学徒制实践进行反思。社会影响政策制定者必须确保雇主和提供者清楚地认识到,最低法定脱产学习时数构成了学徒的就业权利,这绝不能与学徒学习的总学时要求混为一谈。这一建议的政策澄清有助于简化学徒学分的授予过程,同时支持对学徒学习价值更好、更一致的认可。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信