Violation of the Principle of Cooperation and Implicature in the Drama One Liter of Tears

Eko Kurniawan, Ita Fitriana, C. A. P. Sulistyo, Anggita Stovia
{"title":"Violation of the Principle of Cooperation and Implicature in the Drama One Liter of Tears","authors":"Eko Kurniawan, Ita Fitriana, C. A. P. Sulistyo, Anggita Stovia","doi":"10.18196/jjlel.v8i1.20666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study is to provide a description of the various instances where the cooperation principle is violated and implicatures are present in the drama One Litre of Tears. The data on violation of the cooperation principle and implicatures are analyzed using Grice's theory of cooperation principle (1975) and Yule's theory of implicatures (2006). This research is a descriptive study conducted using a qualitative approach. The primary data source utilized in this study is the television drama series titled \"One litre of tears.\" The research data consist of utterances that include breaches of the collaboration principle and encompass implicatures. Data gathering approaches employ the method of listening and recording. Data analysis techniques employ intralingual and extra-lingual correspondence methods, utilizing advanced comparison linking techniques to achieve both equalization and differentiation. The study findings indicate that there are 8 instances of violating the quantity maxim, 6 instances of violating the quality maxim, 6 instances of violating the relevance maxim, and 6 instances of violating the way maxim. These violations result in a total of 10 general conversational implicatures, 6 specialized conversational implicatures, 6 scaled implicatures, and 4 conventional implicatures.","PeriodicalId":499757,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Japanese language education and linguistics","volume":"66 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Japanese language education and linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18196/jjlel.v8i1.20666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study is to provide a description of the various instances where the cooperation principle is violated and implicatures are present in the drama One Litre of Tears. The data on violation of the cooperation principle and implicatures are analyzed using Grice's theory of cooperation principle (1975) and Yule's theory of implicatures (2006). This research is a descriptive study conducted using a qualitative approach. The primary data source utilized in this study is the television drama series titled "One litre of tears." The research data consist of utterances that include breaches of the collaboration principle and encompass implicatures. Data gathering approaches employ the method of listening and recording. Data analysis techniques employ intralingual and extra-lingual correspondence methods, utilizing advanced comparison linking techniques to achieve both equalization and differentiation. The study findings indicate that there are 8 instances of violating the quantity maxim, 6 instances of violating the quality maxim, 6 instances of violating the relevance maxim, and 6 instances of violating the way maxim. These violations result in a total of 10 general conversational implicatures, 6 specialized conversational implicatures, 6 scaled implicatures, and 4 conventional implicatures.
话剧《一公升眼泪》中违反合作和暗示原则的行为
本研究旨在描述电视剧《一公升眼泪》中违反合作原则和出现暗示的各种情况。本研究使用格莱斯的合作原则理论(1975 年)和尤尔的暗示理论(2006 年)分析了违反合作原则和暗示的数据。本研究是一项采用定性方法进行的描述性研究。本研究使用的主要数据来源是电视剧《一公升眼泪》。研究数据包括违反合作原则和包含暗示的话语。数据收集方法采用倾听和记录的方法。数据分析技术采用语内和语外对应的方法,利用先进的对比链接技术实现均衡和区分。研究结果表明,有 8 次违反了数量格言,6 次违反了质量格言,6 次违反了相关性格言,6 次违反了方式格言。这些违规行为总共导致了 10 个一般会话含意、6 个专门会话含意、6 个比例含意和 4 个常规含意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信